Modification of Efficient Vitrification Method by Using Open Pulled Straw (OPS) and EM Grid as Vehicles in Human Embryonic Stem Cell

인간 배아 줄기세포의 OPS와 Grid를 이용한 유리화 동결법의 효율성 비교

  • 박규형 (포천중문의과대학교 생명과학대학원 분자발생과) ;
  • 최성준 (포천중문의과대학교 생명과학대학원 분자발생과) ;
  • 김희선 (서울대학교 의학연구원) ;
  • 오선경 (서울대학교 의학연구원) ;
  • 문신용 (서울대학교 의학연구원) ;
  • 차광렬 (포천중문의과대학교 세포 및 유전자치료연구소) ;
  • 정형민 (포천중문의과대학교 세포 및 유전자치료연구소)
  • Published : 2003.12.01

Abstract

Human embryonic stem (hES) cell lines have been derived from human blastocysts and are expected to have far-reaching applications in regenerative medicine. The objective of this study is to improve freezing method with less cryo-injuries and best survival rates in hES cells by comparing various vitrification conditions. For the vitrifications, ES cells are exposed to the 4 different cryoprotectants, ethylene glycol (EG), 1,2-propanediol (PROH), EG with dime-thylsulfoxide (DMSO) and EG with PROH. We compared to types of vehicles, such as open pulled straw (OPS) or electron microscopic cooper grids (EM grids). Thawed hES cells were dipped into sequentially holding media with 0.2 M sucrose for 1 min, 0.1 M sucrose for 5 min and holding media for 5 min twice and plated onto a fresh feeder layer. Survival rates of vitrified hES cells were assessed by counting of undifferentiated colonies. It shows high survival rates of hES cells frozen with EG and DMSO (60.8%), or EG and PROH(65.8%) on EM grids better than those of OPS, compared to those frozen with EG alone (2.4%) or PROH alone (0%) alone. The hES cells vitrified with EM grid showed relatively constant colony forming efficiency and survival rates, compared to those of unverified hES cells. The vitrified hES cells retained the normal morphology, alkaline phosphates activity, and the expression of SSEA-3 and 4. Through RT-PCR analysis showed Oct-4 gene expression was down-regulated and embryonic germ layer markers were up-regulated in the vitrified hES cells during spontaneous differentiation. These results show that vitrification method by using EM grid supplemented with EG and PROH in hES cells may be most efficient at present to minimize cyto-toxicity and cellular damage derived by ice crystal formation and furthermore may be employed for clinical application.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali J and Shelton N. 1993. Design of vitrification solutions for the cryopreservation of embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil., 99:471-477 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0990471
  2. Cha KY, Chung HM, Lim JM, Ko JJ, Han SY, Choi DH and Yoon TK. 2000. Freezing immature oocytes. Mol. Cell Endocrine, 169: 43-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0303-7207(00)00350-6
  3. Chen SU, Ho HN and Yang YS. 2001. Vitrification of embryos and oocytes with 5.5 mol/l ethylene glycol and 1.0 mol/l sucrose. Hum. Reprod., 16:1778-1779 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.8.1778
  4. Chen SU, Lien YL and Chen HF. 2000. Open pulled straws for vitrification of mature mouse oocytes preserve patterns of meiotic spindles and chromosomes better than conventional straws. Hum. Reprod., 15:2598-2603 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.12.2598
  5. Choi DH, Chung HM, Lim JM, Ko JJ, Yoon TK and Cha KY. 2000. Pregnancy and delivery of healthy infants developed from vitrified blastocysts in an IVF-ET program. Fertil. Steril., 74: 838-839 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01492-8
  6. Chung HM, Hong SW, Lim JM, Lee SH, Cha WT, Ko JJ, Han SY, Choi DH and Cha KY. 2000. In vitro blastocyst formation of human oocytes obtained from unstimulated and stimulated cycles after vitrification at various maturational stages. Fertil. Steril., 73: 545-551 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00546-4
  7. Emiliani S, Bergh MV, Vannin N-S, Biramane J and Englert Y. 2000. Comparison of ethylene glycol, 1,2-propanediol and glycerol for cryopreservation of slow cooled mouse zygotes, 4cell embryos and blastocysts. Human Reprod., 15:905-910 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.4.905
  8. Evans MJ and Kaufman MH. 1981. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature, 292: 154-156 https://doi.org/10.1038/292154a0
  9. Gearhart J. 1998. New potential for human embryonic stem cells. Science, 282: 1061-1062 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5391.1061
  10. Hong SW, Chung HM, Lim JM, Ko JJ, Yoon TK, Yee Bill and Cha KY 1999. Improved human oocyte development after vitrification: a comparison of thawing methods. Fertil. Steril., 72:142-146 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00199-5
  11. Karlsson OM. 2002. Cryopreservation: Freezing and Vitrification. Science, 296:655-656
  12. Keller G and Snodgrass HR. 1999. Human embryonic stem cells: the future is now. NAT Med., 5:151-152 https://doi.org/10.1038/5512
  13. Lane M, Bavister BD, Lyons EA and Forest KT. 1999. Adapting a proven method for flashcooling protein crystals to the cryopreservation of live cells. Nature Biotechnol., 17:1234-1236 https://doi.org/10.1038/70795
  14. Lane M, Schoolcraft WB and Gardner DK. 1999. Vitrification of mouse and human blastocysts using a novel cryoloop container-less technique. Fertil. Steril., 72:1073-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00418-5
  15. Liebermann J, Nawroth F, Isachenko V, Isachenko E, Rahimi G and Tucker MJ. 2002. Potential Importance of Vitrification in Reproductive. Medicine BioI. Reprod., 67: 1671-1680 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.006833
  16. Martino A, Songasen N and Leiba SP. 1996. Development into blastocysts of bovine oocyte cryopreserved by ultra-rapid cooling. Biol, Reprod., 54:1059-1069 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod54.5.1059
  17. Park SE, Lee KA, Son WY, Ko JJ, Lee SH and Cha KY. 1997. Chromosome and spindle configurations of human oocytes matured in vitro after cryopreservation at the germinal vesicle stage. Fertil. Steril., 68:920-926 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00365-8
  18. Rall WH and Fahy GM. 1985. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at - 196'C by vitrification. Nature, 313:573-575 https://doi.org/10.1038/313573a0
  19. Reubinoff BE, Pera MF, Vajta G and Trounson AO. 2001. Effective cryopreservation of human embryonic stem cells by the open pulled straw vitrification method. Human Reprod., 16:2187-2194 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.10.2187
  20. Reubinoff BE, Pera MF, Fong CY, Trounson A and Bongso A. 2000. Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro. Nature Biotechnol., 18:399-405 https://doi.org/10.1038/74447
  21. Shaw JM, Ward C and Trounson AO. 1995. Evaluation of propanediol, ethylene glycol, sucrose and antifreeze proteins on the survival of slow-cooled mouse pronuclear and 4-cell embryos. Hum. Reprod., 10:396-402 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135951
  22. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS and Jones JM. 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science, 282: 1145-1147 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5391.1145
  23. Vajta G, Holm P and Kuwayama M. 1998. Open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification: a new way to reduce cryoinjuries of bovine ova and embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 51:53-58 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199809)51:1<53::AID-MRD6>3.0.CO;2-V
  24. Yoon TK, Chung HM, Lim JM, Han SY, Ko JJ and Cha KY. 2000. Pregnancy and delivery of healthy infants developed from vitrified oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilizationembryo transfer program. Fertil. Steril., 74: 180-181 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00572-0
  25. Yoon TK, Kim TJ, Park SE, Hong SW, Ko JJ, Chung HM and Cha KY. 2003. Live birth after vitrification of oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil. Steril., 79:1323-1326 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00258-9