The study of Ullsi and Baeull are different from Sijo and Kasa

근체시의 편법과 시조 가사 형식의 공통점 고찰

According to my research about Janlgu(絶句) and Sijo(時調), they have not used the same methods to make the phrases (句) within of Sika(詩歌). In this thesis I shown that Ullsi(律詩) and Sijo have used a similar methods to make the phrases. However. the main assertion of this thesis is to show the fact that Sijo has changed into Kasa(歌辭) the same way Ullsi has changed into Baeull(排律). I have found that Ullsi and Baeull are different from Sijo and Kasa. Jaulgu and Sijo don't have any similarities except the use of their short sentences. Ullsi is similar to a poem with three lines in each verse. To separate the poem with three lines in each verse to three parts of the first stanza. the last stanza(結聯). and how the middle stanza contrasts (related to the phrase or stanza of poems which have a pair.). I have found out how the poem with three lines in verse is made. The middle phrase of Sijo is made up of complete opposites. I think that Sijo has the same relation. with Ullsi. Also. Kasa is made up opposites. Antithesis is a kind of way to make Ullsi by phrase and clause. I have found the antithesis in the middle phrase of Sijo. Kasa is made up antithesis and is the relativity of Ullsi and Baeull and the relativity of Sijo and Kasa are explained by antithesis. As Ullsi changed to BaeulL Sijo has changed to Kasa. They have the same method of making phrases. Some have insisted that Sijo was not from Hansi. I don't agree with that. Even if Ullsi is not from Sijo. this thesis has proven that the method of making phrases of Ullsi and the method of making phrases of Sijo are very similar. In this thesis. I have found out that Ullsi and Baeull are very similar with Sijo and Kasa. I think that these old types of Chinese poems have affected Korean Culture. So. in this thesis. I have tried to show just a little fact about this old type of Chinese poems and how it has affected Korean Culture.

이 글은 시가의 편법을 한시와 비교한 것이다. 지금까지 시조는 주로 한시 절구의 편법과 흡사하다고 알려져 있으나, 실제는 절구와 시조는 그 형식이 짧다는 것 말고는 별로 관련성이 없다. 그보다는 율시의 수련과 미련을 제외한 가운데 대우가 되는 연, 이렇게 나누어 놓고 보면 3항시의 편법임을 알 수 있다. 이는 시조의 중장이 대우로 되어 있어 서로 깊은 상관성을 보이는 것이다. 또한 율시와 배율의 편법의 관계는 시조와 가사의 편법의 관계와 흡사하다. 가사의 편법은 시조의 중장이 길어진 것이기 때문이다. 이렇게 해서 율시와 배율, 시조와 가사에 흐르는 공통점이 발견된다.