대한간호학회지 (Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing)

한국간호과학회 (Korean Society of Nursing Science)
권호 표지

요양병원 입원노인의 환자군 분류에 따른 자원이용수준

Resource use of the Elderly in Long-term Care Hospital sing RUG-III

  • 김은경 (을지의과대학교 간호대학)
  • 발행 : 2003.04.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study was to classify elderly in long-term care hospitals for using Resource Utilization Group(RUG-III) and to consider feasibility of payment method based on RUG-III classification system in Korea. Method: This study designed by measuring resident characteristics using the Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set(RAI-MDS) and staff time. The data were collected from 382 elderly over sixty-year old, inpatient in the five long-term care hospitals. Staff time was converted into standard time based on the average wage of nurse and aids. Result: The subjects were classified into 4 groups. The group of Clinically Complex was the largest(46.3%), Reduced Physical Function(27.2%), Behavior Problem(17.0%), and Impaired Cognition(9.4%). The average resource use for one resident in terms of care time(nurses, aids) was 183.7 minutes a day. Relative resource use was expressed as a case mix index(CMI) calculated as a proportion of mean resource use. The CMI of Clinically Complex group was the largest(1.10), and then Reduced Physical Function(0.93), Behavior Problem(0.93), and Impaired Cognition(0.83) followed. The difference of the resource use showed statistical significance between major groups(p<0.0001). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the RUG-III classification system differentiates resources provided to elderly in long-term care hospitals in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arling, G., Nordquist, R. H., Brant, B. A., & Capitman, J. A. (1987). Nursing home case mix: Patient classification by nursing resource use. Medical Care, 25(1), 9-19
  2. Bjorkgren, M. A., Hakkinen, U., Finn-Soveri, U. H., & Fries, B. E. (1999). Validity and reliability of Resource Utilization Groups(RUG-III) in Finnish long-term care facilities. Scand J public Health, 27(3), 228-34
  3. Burke, R. & Cornelius, B. (1991). Analysis of staff time based on HCFA's multi-state case mix and quality demonstration and HCFA's staff time measurement study for the national SNF system. Health Care Financing Administration, Baltimore
  4. Cameron, J. M. (1985). Case-mix and resource use in long-term care. Medical Care, 23(4), 296-309
  5. Carpenter, G. I., Main, A., & Turner, G. F. (1995). Casemix for the elderly inpatient: Resource Utilization Groups(RUG) validation project. Casemix for the elderly inpatient working group, Age Ageing. 24(5), 5-13
  6. Chang, H. S., Kim, E. K., Oh, J. H., & Chang, H. J. (1996). A study on development oj Management oj the Long-Term Care Hospital. Korea Health Management Institute
  7. Chang, H. S. (1999). Hospital service mix for elderly inpatients : acute and non-acute care services. Catholic University, Korea, Seoul
  8. Choi, B. H. (2001). Perspectives of introduction of long-term care insurance in Korea. Korea RAI Research Society, 2nd symposium, 27-61
  9. CMS(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services). (2002). http://cms.hhs.gov/medicaid/reports, http://cms.hhs.gov
  10. Cohen, J. W., & Dubay, L. C. (1990). The Effects of reimbursement method and ownership on nursing home costs, case mix and staffing. Inquiry, 27, 183-200
  11. Fries, B. E., Schneider, D. P., Foley, W. J., Gavazzi, M., Burke, R., & Cornelius, E. (1994). Refining a casemix measure for nursing homes: Resource Utilization Groups(RUG-III). Medical Care, 32, 668
  12. Gruber-Baldini, A., Zimmerman, S., Mortimore, E., & Magaziner, J. (2000). The validity of the minimum data set in measuring the cognitive impairment of persons admitted to nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48, 1601-1606
  13. Harrington, C., Carrillo, H., Mullan, J., & Swan, J. H. (1999). Nursing home staffing in the states: The 1991-1995 period. Medical Care Research and Review, 55(3), 334-363
  14. Hawes, C., Morris, J. N., Phillips, C. D., Fries, B. E., Murphy, K., & Vincent, M. (1997). Development of the nursing home resident assessment instrument in the USA. Age and Aging, 26(S2), 19-25
  15. Ikegarni, N., Fries, B. E., Takagi, Y., Ikeda, S., & Ibe, T. (1994). Applying RUG-III in Japanese long-term care facilities. The Geromologiet, 34(3), 628-639
  16. Jung, K. H., Oh, Y. H., Byun, J. K., Byun, Y. C., Cho, A. J., & Moon, H. S. (1998). A survey study on lije style and welfare need of elderly on 1998 years. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs
  17. Kim, H. J. (2000). The validity of RAI-MDS 2.0. Seoul National University of Korea, Seoul
  18. Kin, H. J., Jun, K. J., Kim, H. G., So, A. A., Lee, K. M., Kim, E. Y., & Park, E. O. (2000). Development of Services Delivery Modelfor the Elderly in the Community. Korea Health Industry Development Institute & Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Korea, Seoul
  19. KNSO(Korea National Statistical Office). (2002). Sensus of population in Korea on 2000 years. Korea National Statistical Office
  20. Lee, J. J. (1999). Application of RUG-III for long-term care elderly patients. Yonsei University of Korea, Seoul
  21. MOHW(JvIinistry of Health & Welfare). (2001). Introduction of the elderly health and welfare on 2001 year
  22. Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E., Steel, K., Ikegami, N., Bernalbei, R., Carpenter, G. I., Gilgen, R., Hirdes, J. P., & Topinkova, E. (1997). Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting : Applicability of the MDS-HC, The American Geriatrics Society, 45, 1017-1024
  23. Schroll, M. (1995). Reliability estimates for the minimum data set for nursing home resident assessment; Comparison between USA and Denmark Copenhagen Univ. Denmark
  24. Sgadari, A., Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E., Ljunggren, G., Jonsson, P. V., DuPaquier, J. N., & Schroll, M. (1997). Efforts to establish the reliability of the Resident Assessment Instrument(RAl). Age and Aging, 26(2), 27-31 https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/26.suppl_2.27
  25. Topinkova, E., Neuwirth, J., Mellanova, A., Stankova, M., & Hass, T. (2000). Case-mix classification in post-acute and long-term care. Validation of Resource Utilization Group III(RUG-III) in the Czech Republic. Cas Lek Cesk, 139 (2), 42-48
  26. Winn, S. (1975). Assessment of cost-related characteristics and conditions of long-term care patients. Inquiry, 12, 344
  27. Zbylot, S., Job, C., Evelyn, M., Boulter C. (1995). A Case-Mix Classification System for Long-Term Care Facilities. Nursing Management, 26(4), 49-54