DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Liquefaction Characteristics of HDPE, PP and PS by Isothermal Pyrolysis

HDPE, PP 및 PS의 등온열분해에 의한 액화 특성

  • Yu, Hong-Jeong (Department of Chemical Engineering, Chungbuk. Nat'l, Univ.) ;
  • Park, Su-Yul (Department of Chemical Engineering, Chungbuk. Nat'l, Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Bong-Hee (Department of Chemical Engineering, Chungbuk. Nat'l, Univ.)
  • 유홍정 (충북대학교 공과대학 화학공학과) ;
  • 박수열 (충북대학교 공과대학 화학공학과) ;
  • 이봉희 (충북대학교 공과대학 화학공학과)
  • Published : 2002.09.30

Abstract

Isothermal pyrolysis of high density polyethylene(HDPE), polypropylene(PP) and polystyrene(PS) was performed at $450^{\circ}C$, respectively. The effect of pyrolysis time on yield and product composition was investigated. Conversion and liquid yield obtained during HDPE pyrolysis continuously increased with time up to 80minutes, but those of PP and PS did not largely change after 35minutes. Each liquid product formed during the pyrolysis was classified into gasoline, kerosene, light oil and wax according to the distillation temperature based on the petroleum product quality standard of Korea Petroleum Quality Inspection Institute. The major liquid product of HDPE pyrolysis was light oiH34 wt.% based on the amount of HDPE treated) and the amounts of the other liquid ingredients(gasoline, kerosene and wax) were almost the same. On the other hand, the pyrolysis of PP produced 27 wt.% gasoline, 22 wt.% kerosene, 24 wt.% light oil and 13wt.% wax, and the pyrolysis of PS produced 56 wt.% gasoline, 12 wt.% kerosene, 9 wt.% light oil and 13 wt.% wax.

Keywords

References

  1. R. Miranda, H. Pakdel, C. Roy, and C.Vasile, Potym. Deg. Stab.. 73, 47 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00066-0
  2. K. Ramdoss and R. Tarrer, FueI 77(4),293 (1998)
  3. M. V. S. Murty, P. Rangarajan, E. A.Gmlke, and D. Bhattacharyya, FuetProcessing Tecfvwtogy, 49, 75 (1996)
  4. M. W. Shaub and W. Tsang, Environ. Sci.Technot., 17, 721 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1021/es00118a007
  5. G. Luo, T. Suto, S. Yasu, and K. Kato,Potym Deg. Stab., 70, 97 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(00)00095-1
  6. R. Miranda, J. Yang, C. Roy, and C.Vasile, PoIym Deg. Stdb., 72, 469 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00048-9
  7. M. V. S. Murty, E. A. Grulke, and D.Bhattacharyya, Potym. Deg. Stab., 61, 421(1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00228-0
  8. II. Bockhom, A. Homung, U. Homung, andD. Schawaller, J. Arvit. AppL Pyrolysis, 48,93 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(98)00131-4
  9. Y. Liu, J. Qian, and J. Wang, FueIProcessing TechnoIogy, 63, 45 (2000)
  10. F. J. Mastral, E. Esperanza, P. Garcia,and M. Juste, J. AnaI. Appl. Pyrotysis,63, 1 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(01)00137-1