경작지 및 산지토양의 층위별 중금속농도의 분포 특성

The Distribution Characteristics of Heavy Metals at Field and Upland Soils

  • 최이송 (경희대학교 환경응용화학부) ;
  • 박재영 (경희대학교 환경응용화학부) ;
  • 오종민 (경희대학교 환경응용화학부)
  • Choi, I-Song (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kyunghee University) ;
  • Park, Jea-Young (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kyunghee University) ;
  • Oh, Jong-Min (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kyunghee University)
  • 발행 : 2002.06.29

초록

토양중 중금속의 층위별 농도분포 및 경작지토양 표면의 축적현상을 파악하고, 오염가능성을 평가하기 위하여, 경작지 및 산지토양의 중금속농도(Cu(II), Zn(II), Pb(II), Cd(II))를 층위별로 0.1mole L$^{-1}$ HCI 추출법과 HNO$_3$-HCIO$_4$ 분해추출법을 이용하여 조사하였다. 0.1mole L$^{-1}$ HCI 추출법에서 경작지토양의 표층 중금속농도는 산지토양에 비하여 Pb(ll)를 제외하고 높은 농도를 보였다. 층위별 농도분포는 경작지토양의 표층에서 Cu(II), Zn(II), Cd(II)농도가 심층에 비하여 월등히 높은 반면, 산지토양에서는 층위별 농도분포의 차가 없었다. HNO$_3$-HCIO$_4$분해추출법에서, 중금속농도는 산지토양이 경작지토양보다 높았으며, 층위별 분포에 있어서는 모든 토양에서 큰 차이를 보이지 않았다. 이와 같은 결과를 종합해 보면, 중금속의 자연함량은 산지토양이 높았음에도 불구하고, 인간활동에 의해 유입된 중금속이 경작지토양의 표층에서 축적된 것으로 판단된다. 또한 이들 표층에 분포한 중금속은 토양으로부터 용출되기 쉬운 형태로 존재하며, 특히 Cd(II)는 경작지토양에서 잠재적인 오염원인 것으로 판단된다. 층위에 따른 중금속의 농도는 그들의 흡착 특성에 영향을 받는 것으로 판단된다. 토양에 대한 중금속의 흡착 강도를 판단하기 위하여 0.1HCl$_{ext}$HNCL$_{dig}$의 값을 도입해보면, 그들의 흡착 강도는 Cu(II)>Zn(II)>Pb(II)>Cd(II)의 순으로 감소하였다. 경작지토양에서의 중금속 분포특성은 그들의 복잡한 이동특성 및 토지이용의 중요성 때문에 더욱 자세한 연구가 요구된다.

Heavy metal concentrations (Cu(II), Zn(II), Pb(II) and Cd(II)) at field and upland soils were investigated with two extraction methods, 0.1mole L$^{-1}$ HCI extraction and HNO$_3$-HCIO$_4$ digestion, in order to estimate soil pollution and to understand their distribution and accumulation characteristics. Through an application of 0.1mole L$^{-1}$ HCI extraction method, the surface horizons of field soils were found to have higher concentrations of heavy metals (except Pb(II)) than those of upland soil. It was also seen that Cu(II), Zn(II) and Cd(II) were enriched in surface horizon of field soils, whereas upland soils did not show much difference across depth. When the method of HNO$_3$-HCIO$_4$ digestion was used, upland soils showed higher concentrations than those of other soils, and the distribution of heavy metals did not show much difference between horizons of all soils. From these results, it was recognized that, although total natural contents of heavy metals were the largest in upland soil, surface horizons of field soils became gradually polluted with heavy metals. Especially, Cd(II) is considered as a potential metallic pollutant in field soils because of its weak adsorption strength. Concentrations of heavy metals also seemed to be influenced by their adsorption characteristics. When we computed 0.1HCl$_{ext}$HNCL$_{dig}$ ratios to estimate the adsorption strengths of soil heavy metals, their adsorption strengths decreased on the order of Cu(II) > Zn(II)> Pb(II) > Cd(II). The distribution characteristics of heavy metals in field soil, especially Cd(II),are required more detail study because of its importance of land use and complicated mobilization characteristic.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 자연보전국토양보전과, 2002, 2001년 토양측정망 운영결과, p. 1-9
  2. 岡崎正規, 1987, 土壤中における重金履の轝郵. 水質汚濁硏究, 10(7), 407-412
  3. Asami, T., 1984, Pollution of soils by cadmium, In Changing metal cycles and human health. Ed. J. O. Nriagu, p.95-111, Life science research report 28, Springger-Ver-lag Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo
  4. Atanassova, I., 1999, Competitive effect of copper, zinc,cadmium and nickel on ion adsorption and desorptionby soil clays. Water, Air, and soil pollution, 113, 115-125
  5. Bibak, A., 1994, Cobalt, copper, and manganese adsorpdon by aluminium and iron oxides and humic acid. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 25, 3229-3239 https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629409369261
  6. Bowden, J.W., Posner, A.M., and Quirk, J.R, 1977, Ionicadsorption on variable charge mineral surface. Theoretical-charge development and titration curves. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 15, 121-136
  7. Bowen, H.J.M., 1979, Environmental chemistry of the elements, Academic Press, London
  8. limura, K., 1981, Heavy metals in soil. In Heavy metal pollution in soils of Japan. Ed. K. Kakuzo and Y. Ichiro, p. 17-35, Japan Science Societies Press, Tokyo
  9. Krishnamurti, G.S.R., Huang, P.M., Kozak, L.M., Rostad,H.P.W., and Van Rees, K.C.J., 1997, Distribution of cadmium in selected soil profiles of Saskatchewan, Canada: speciation and availability, Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 77, 613-619 https://doi.org/10.4141/S97-008
  10. Levesque, M.P. and Mathur, S.P., 1986, Soil tests for copper, iron, manganese, and zinc in Histosols: 1. Theinfluence of soil properties, iron, manganese, and zincon the level and distribution of copper. Soil Science,142, 153-163 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198609000-00005
  11. Lexmond, T.M., 1980, A contribution to the establishmentof safe copper levels in soil. Europe Economic Communiting Workshop, Problems encountered with copper, 8-10 Octorber, Bordeaux, France
  12. Mathur, S.P. and Levesque, M.P., 1983, The effect of usingfor mitigating Histosol subsidence; 2. The distributionof copper, manganese, zinc, and iron in an organic soil, mineral sublayers, and their mixture in the context ofsetting a threshold of phytotoxic soil copper. Soil Science, 135, 166-176 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198303000-00006
  13. Miller, W.P., Martens, D.C., and Zelazny, L.W, 1986, Effect of sequence in extraction of trace metals fromsoils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50, 598-601 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030011x
  14. Mortvedt, J.J., 1987, Cadmium levels in soils and plantsfrom some longterm soil fertility experiments in theUnited States of America. Journal of Environmental Quality, 16, 137-142 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1987.00472425001600020008x
  15. Salim, I.A., Miller, C.J., and Howard, J.L., 1996, Sorptionisotherm sequential extraction analysis of heavymetalretention in landfill liners. Soil Science Society of Amehca Journal, 60, 107-114 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000010018x
  16. Sanders, J.R., 1982, The effect of pH upon the copper and cupric ion concentrations in soil solutions. Journal of Soil Science, 33, 679-689 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01799.x
  17. Sims, J.T., 1986, Soil pH effects on the distribution andplant availability of manganese, copper, and zinc. SoilScience Society of America Journal, 50, 367-373 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000020023x
  18. Shumari, L.M., 1978, Zinc, Manganese, and Copper in soilfractions. Soil Science, 140, 11-12 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198507000-00003
  19. Sterckeman, T., Douay, R, Proix, N., and Fourrier, H.,2000, Vertical distribution of Cd, Pb and Zn in soilsnear smelters in the North of France. Environmental Pollution, 107, 377-389 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00165-7
  20. United States Department of Agriculture, 1994, Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 6th ed., pp. 306, United States Departmerit of Agriculture, Washington
  21. Williams, C.H. and David, D.J., 1976, The accumulation insoil of cadmium residues from phosphate fertilizers andtheir effect on the cadmium content of plants. Soil Science, 121, 86-93 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197602000-00004
  22. Xian, X. and Shokohifard, G., 1989, Effect of pH onchemical forms and plant availability of cadmium, zinc,and lead in polluted soils. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 45, 125-273
  23. Zhang, M., Alva, A.K., Li, Y.C., and Calvert, D.V, 1997, Chemical association of Cu, Zn, Mn, and Pb in selectedsandy citrus soils. Soil Science, 162, 181-188 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199703000-00003