DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bean common mosaic virus and Peanut mottle virus isolated from Peanut in Korea

땅콩(Arachis hypogaea)에서 분리한 Bean common mosaic virus와 Peanut mottle virus

  • 구봉진 (영남대학교 이과대학 생물학과) ;
  • 신혜영 (영남대학교 이과대학 생물학과) ;
  • 성정현 (영남대학교 이과대학 생물학과) ;
  • 강동균 (경북농업기술원 생물자원연구소) ;
  • 장무웅 (영남대학교 이과대학 생물학과)
  • Published : 2002.08.01

Abstract

For the survey of viruses infected in peanut cultivated in Korea, peanut seeds and leaves showing viral symptoms were collected from their growing areas. Typical symptoms on virus infected peanut leaves including mosaic, mottle with necrosis, yellowing, stripe or vein banding and stunts were observed. Two viruses isolated from the naturally infected peanuts were identified as Bean common mosaic virus(BCMV-PSt) and Peanut mottle virus(PeMoV) by their host range, immunosorbent elcetron microscopy(ISEM), direct immuno staining assay(DISA), RT-PCR, and intracellural symptoms. Direct negative staining method by electron microscope showed filamentous particles of about 780 m in length as well as inclusion bodies. In ultrathin sections of BCMV-PSt and PeMoV infected tissues, cytoplasmic cylindrical inclusions as well as filamentous virus particles were observed in the cytoplasm of parenchyma cells. ISEM revealed filamentous particles strongly decorated with antiserums of BCMV-PSt and PeMoV Peanut seeds were stained with BCMV-PSt and PeMoV antisera indicating the possibility of seed transmission far these viruses. Seedlings germinated from peanut seeds which reacted with antiserums of BCMV-PSt by DISA showed mild mottle or stripe symptoms while mosaic and necrotic mottle symptoms were observed for PeMoV-positive seedlings. Filamentous particles were strongly decorated with each antiserum under ISEM observation. BCMV-PSt coat protein gene of about 1.2 Kbp was amplified by RT-PCR. Altogether these results indicate that BCMV-PSt is the most prevalent virus infecting peanut in Korea.

한국산 땅콩에 감염되어 있는 바이러스를 동정하기 위하여 땅콩 재배지 에서 모자이크, 괴저를 동반한 얼룩무늬, 황화, 줄무늬, 엽맥녹대, 위축 등의 바이러스 감염 증상을 나타내는 땅콩잎 및 땅콩을 채집하였다. 이들 시료로부터 기주범위, 면역전자현미경(ISEM), 감염 세포내의 바이러스의 존재양식, direct immune staining assay(DISA), RT-PCR 등에 의하여 Bean common mosaic virus(BCMV-PSt)와 Peanut mottle virus(PeMoV)를 분리하였다. 이들 시료를 DN법에 의거하여 전자현미경으로 관찰한 바 길이가 약 780 nm의 사상형 입자와 세포질 봉입체를 관찰하였다. 초박절편의 시료 관찰에서도 길이 약 700 nm의 사상 입자가 엽육세포 등의 세포질과 액포에 산재 혹은 병행 배열로 존재해 있는 영상 및 세포질 봉입체가 반드시 확인되었다. 또한, 이들 시료를 BCMV-PSt와 PeMoV의 항혈청으로 ISEM을 실시한 결과, 두 항체에 모두 decoration 되었음을 확인하였다. 두 바이러스가 종자전염이 되는 지를 확인하기 위하여 땅콩을 직접 BCMV-PSt와 PeMoV의 항혈청으로 DISA를 실시하였다. 그 결과, BCMV-PSt 및 PeMoV 항혈청에 발색이 되었으며, 이들을 발아시켜 유식물체를 획득하였다. 이들 유식물체에서도 바이러스 감염 증상인 얼룩무늬 증상이 관찰되었고, 이들을 BCMV-PSt와 PeMoV의 항혈청으로 ISEM방법으로 검경한 결과, 두 항체에 모두 decoration 되었다. 또한, 자연감염 식물체 및 DISA에 의해 바이러스 감염이 확인된 종자를 발아시킨 2년생 식물체로부터 생물검정 법 및 ISEM에 의해 두 종의 바이러스가 검출되었다. Rl-PCR을 실시한 결과, 약 1.2Kb크기의 BCMV-PSt coat protein유전자가 증폭 되었다. 이 연구결과, 한국산 땅콩에 BCMV-PSt가 가장 많이 감염되어 있음을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Anjos, J. T. N. Dos, Kitajima, E. W., Charchar, M. J. A. and Marinho, V. L. A. 1998. Natural infection of Arachis pintoi by peanut mottle virus in central Brazil. Fitopatotogia BrasiIeira 23(1): 71-74
  2. Bock, K. R. and Kuhn, C. W. 1975. Peanut mottle virus. No. 141. In: Descriptions of Ptant Viruses. CMI/AAB. England
  3. Chang, C. A., Purcifull, D. E. and Zettller, F. W. 1990. Comparison of two strains of peanut stripe virus in Taiwan. Ptant Dis. 74: 593-596 https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-74-0593
  4. Demski, J. W., Reddy, D. V, Sowell, G. and Bays, D. 1984. Peanut stripe virus-a new seed-home potyvirus from China infecting g[0undmit(Arachis hypogaea). Ann. Appt. BioI. 105: 495-501 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1984.tb03075.x
  5. Doi, Y, Toriyama, S., Yora, K. and Auyama, H: 1969. Direct negative staining methods for detection for virus particles in fresh preparations from infected plant tissue. Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan. 35: 180-187 https://doi.org/10.3186/jjphytopath.35.180
  6. Higgins, C. M., Cassidy, B. G., Teycheney, P. Y, Wongkaew, S. and Dietzgen, R. G. 1998. Sequence of the coat protein gene of five peanut stripe virus(PStV) strains from Thailand and their evolutionary relationship with other bean common mosaic virus sequencer. Archives of Vtrology, 143(9): 1655-1667 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007050050407
  7. Hoffmann, K., Geske, S. M. and Moyer, J. W. 1998. Pathogenesis of tomato spotted wilt virus in peanut plants dually infected with peanut mottle virus. Ptant Dis. 82: 610-614 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.6.610
  8. 김정수, 이순형, 이민웅.1988.땅콩에 모자이크 및 위축댕징을 일으키는 peanut stunt virus. 한국식물병리학회지 4: 88-94
  9. Konate, G. and Barro, N. 1993. Dissemination and detection of peanut clump virus in groundnut seed. Ann. Appt. Biot. 123:623-627 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1993.tb04932.x
  10. Kuhn, C. W. 1965. Symptomatology, host range, and effect onyield of a seed-transmitted peanut virus. Phytopathotogy 55:880-884
  11. Lin, N. S., Hsu, Y. H. and Hsu, H. T. 1990. Immunological detection of plant viruse and a mycoplasmalike organism by direct tissue blotting on nitrocellulose membranes .PhytopathoIogy 80: 824-828 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-80-824
  12. Mastumoto, J. I., Ohki, S. T. and Inouye, T. 1991. Incidence, of peanut stripe virus in seeds and field plants of peanut in Japan. Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 57: 587-590 https://doi.org/10.3186/jjphytopath.57.587
  13. Milne, R. G. and Loisoni, N. 1977. Rapid immune electron microscopy, In: Method in Virotogy, pp. 265-281, Academic Press, New York
  14. Pappu, S. S., Pappu, H. R., Chang, C. A., Culbeath, A. K. and Todd, J. W. 1998. Differentiation of biologically distinct peanut stripe poty virus strains by a nudeotide polymorphism-based assay. Ptant Dis. 82: 1121-1125 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.10.1121
  15. Prasada Rao, R. D. V. J., Chakrabarty, S. K. and Reddy, A. S. 1997. Interception of peanut stripe virus in soybean seeds imported from China. Indian J. of Ptant Protection 25(1): 81
  16. Recheigl, N. A., Tolin, S. A., Grayson, R. L. and Hooper, G. R. 1989. Ultrastructural comparison of peanut infected with stripe and blotch variants of peanut stripe virus. Phytopathotogy 79: 156-161 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-79-156
  17. Reddy, D. V. R. 1991. Groundnut viruses and virus diseases: distribution, identification and control. Review of PIant PathoIogy 70: 665-678
  18. Reddy, D. V. R. 1998. Control measures for the economicallyimportant peanut viruses, In: Ptant Vtrus Disease Controt. byA. Hadidi, R. K. Khetarpal, and H. Koganezawa, eds. pp. 541-546, APS Press
  19. Reddy, A. S., Hobbs, H. A., Delfose, R, Murthy, A. K. and Reddy,D. V. R. 1998. Seed transmission of Idian peanut clumpvims(IPCV) in peanut and millets. Ptant Dis. 82: 343-346 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.3.343
  20. Ryabov, E. V., Oparka, K. J., Cmz, S. S., Robinson, D. J. andTaliasky, M. E. 1998. Intracellural location of two groundnutrosette umbravirus protein delivered by PVX and TMVvectors. ViroIogy 242(2): 303-313
  21. Sutic, D. D., Ford, R. E. and Tosic, M. T. 1998. Virus diseases of peanut (Arachis hypogaea). In: Ptant Virus Diseases. by Sutic, D. D., Ford, R. E. and Tosic, M. T. pp.229-240. CRC Press. London
  22. Wongkaew, S. and Dollet, M. 1990. Comparison of peanut stripe virus isolates using symptomatology on particular hosts and serology. Oleagineux 45: 267-278
  23. Xu, Z., Banett, O. W. and Gilson, P. B. 1986. Characterization of peanut stunt virus strains by host reactions, serology, and RNA patterns. PhytopathoIogy 76: 390-395 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-76-390
  24. Zeyong, X., Higgins, C. M., Kunrong, C., Dietzgen, R. G., Zhongyi, Z., Liying, Y. and Xiaoping, F. 1998. Evidence for a third taxonomic subgroup of peanut stunt virus from China. Plant Dis. 82: 992-998 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.9.992

Cited by

  1. First Report of Cucumber mosaic virus Infection of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) in South Korea vol.99, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-14-1030-PDN