대한치과교정학회지 (The korean journal of orthodontics)

  • 제32권3호
  • /
  • Pages.155-163
  • /
  • 2002
  • /
  • 2234-7518(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-372X(eISSN)
대한치과교정학회 (The Korean Association Of Orthodontists)
권호 표지

치조성 양악 전돌 환자에서 컴퓨터를 이용한 치료 결과 예측의 정확성

Comparison of computer-based treatment prediction with true results in bimaxillary protrusion cases

  • 이리나 (고려대학교 임상치의학 대학원 교정과) ;
  • 임용규 (고려대학교 임상치의학 대학원 교정과) ;
  • 이동렬 (고려대학교 임상치의학 대학원 교정과)
  • Lee, Rhi-na (Dept. of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Lim, Yong-Kyu (Dept. of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Yul (Dept. of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University)
  • 발행 : 2002.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

치조성 양악 전돌 증례에서 컴퓨터 시뮬레이션을 이용한 연조직 측모의 치료 결과 예측의 객관적 정확성을 상, 하악 제 1소구치 발거를 통해 교정치료를 받은 21명의 성인 여성을 대상으로 $Quick\;Ceph\;Image\;Pro^{TM}\;&\;Quick Eeph\;2000^{TM}$ 을 이용하여 조사, 평가하였다. 치료 전 측모 두부방사선 규격사진 투사도에서 경조직 이동량을 계측하고 Quick Ceph system 상에서 경조직을 동일한 양 이동시켜 컴퓨터시뮬레이 션을 위한 기준으로 삼았다. 이후 프로그램을 통해 연조직 변화를 시뮬레이션하고, 이 자료와 실제 치료 결과로 얻어진 연조직 계측 값을 측정하여 비교해 봄으로써 치료 결과 예측에 대한 정확도를 확인하고 임상에의 적용시 고려할 사항을 알아보았다. 시뮬레이션 결과 계측 항목의 수평 성분은 실제 치료 결과보다 작게, 수직 성분은 치료 결과보다 크게 예측하는 것으로 나타났으며 치료시 의 후방 견인은 실제보다 확대되어 나타나는 경 향을 보였다. 상악에서는 항목간 예측 오차의 방향이 일정하여 예측치가 실제보다 더 후방 이동되어 나타났으나, 하악에서는 증례간 차이가 컸다 Upper Lip Length는 짧게, Upper Vermilion Length는 길게 예측하여 시뮬레이션시 상순이 말려 보이는(rolling)효과를 확인할 수 있었으며 하순에서도 유사한 성향이 나타났으나 상순에 비해서 약하게 나타났다.

This study was performed to assess the accuracy of computer-based treatment prediction for soft tissue profile using Quick Ceph Image $Pro^{TM}\;&\;Quick\;Ceph\;2000^{TM}$ in bimaxillary protrusion cases. The Ore- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms of 21 female adults treated by low first premolar extraction were imaged and 9 landmarks and 27 specific soft tissue mesurements were digitized for comparing actual treatment results with computer simulations. The results of this study showed that Quick Ceph Image $Pro^{TM}\;&\;Quick\;Ceph\;2000^{TM}$ tends to overestimeate horizontal changes and underestimate vertical changes. In the computer simulation, upper lip showed rolling tendency. The upper lip measurements were disposed to be regular direction hut lower lip measurements were varied case by case even if it was statistically insignificant.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. L Angle EH Malocclusion of the teeth. Philadelphia: SS White Dental Mfg, Co. 1907
  2. Case CS. A Practical treatment on the techniques and principles of dental orthopedics. 2nd ed. Chicago: 1921
  3. Subtelny JD, The soft tissue profile, Growth and Treatment changes Angle Orthod 1961 : 31 : 105-22
  4. Bloom LA Perioral profile changes in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1961 : 47 : 371-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(61)90177-4
  5. Rudee DA. Proportional profile changes concurrent with orthodontic therapy, Am J Orthod 1964 : 50 : 421-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(64)90205-2
  6. Anderson JP, Joondeph PR, Turpin DL. A cephalometric study of profile changes in Orthodontically treated cases for 10 years. Angle Orthod 1973: 43 : 324-36
  7. Roos N, Soft tissue profile change in Class II treatment. Am J Orthod 1977: 72 : 165-75 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90057-4
  8. Oliver BM. The influence of lip thickness and strain on upper lip res-ponse to incisor retraction, Am J Orthod 1982 : 82 : 141-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90492-4
  9. Rains MD, Nanda R. Soft-tissue changes associated with maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod 1982 : 81 : 481-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90427-4
  10. Garner LD, Soft tissue changes concurrent with orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1974: 66 : 367-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90047-5
  11. Talass MF, Talass L, Baker RC, Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987: 91 : 385-94 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90391-X
  12. Waldman BH. Change in lip contour with maxillary incisor retraction. Angle Orthod 1982 : 52 : 129-34
  13. Riedel RA Esthetics and its relation to orthodontic therapy, Angle Orthod 1950: 20 : 168-78
  14. Burstone CJ, Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967 : 53 : 262-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(67)90022-X
  15. Hershey HG, Incisor tooth retraction and subsequent profile changes.i n post adolescent female patients. Am J Orthod 1972 : 61 : 45-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(72)90175-3
  16. Wisth PJ, Soft tissue response to upper incisor retraction in boys, Br J Orthod 1974: 1 : 199-204 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.1.5.199
  17. Ricketts RM, Bench RW. Visual treatment objectives or V.T.O. Bio- progressive Therapy. 1979: part 3
  18. Gerbo LR, Poulton DR, Covell DA, Russell CA. Comparison of a computer-based orthognathic surgery prediction system to postsur-gical results. lnt J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1997 : 12 : 55-63
  19. Sinclair PM, Kilpelainen P, Phillips C. el. al. The accuracy of video imaging in orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Ortho. 1995: 107: 177-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70134-6
  20. Sarver DM. Videoimaging: The pros and cons. Angle Orthod 1993 :63 : 167-70
  21. Upton PM, Sadowsky PL, Sarver DM, Heaven TJ. Evaluation of video imaging prediction in combined maxillary and mandibular orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1997 : 112 : 656-65 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70231-2
  22. Carter AC, Larson BE, Guenthner TA. Accuracy of video imaging in mandibular surgery. lnt J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1996 : 11: 289-300
  23. Jacobsen A. Planning for orthognathic surgery-art or science? lnt J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1990: 5 : 217-24
  24. Bing NR. The accuracy of computer generated prediction tracings. lnt. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989: 18 : 148-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(89)80113-4
  25. Cangialosi TJ, Chung JM, Elliott DF, Meistrell ME Jr. Reliability of computer-generated prediction tracing. Angle Orthod 1995 : 65 : 277 -84
  26. McNeill RW, Proffit ws, White RP. Cephalometric Prediction for Orthodontic surgery. Angle Orthod 1972 : 42 : 154-64
  27. Turpin DL. Computers coming on-line for diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 1990 : 60 : 163
  28. Ackerman JH, Proffit WR. Communication in orthodontic treatment planning : bioethical and informal consent issues. Angle orthod 1995: 65 : 253-61
  29. Eales EA, Newton C, Jones ML. Sugar A. The accuracy of compu-terized prediction of the soft tissue profile : A study of 25 patients treated by means of the Le Fort I osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994 : 9 : 141-52
  30. Lew K. The reliability of computerized cephalometric soft tissue pre-diction following bimaxillary anterior subapical osteotomy. lnt J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1992 : 7 : 97-101
  31. Le TN, Samcshima GT, Grubb JE, Sinclair PM. The role of com-puterized video imaging in predicting adult extraction treatment outcomes. Angle Orthod 1998 : 68 : 391-400
  32. Romani K., Agahi F, Nanda R, Zcmik JH. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people. Angle Orthod 1993 : 63 : 175-82
  33. Jensen AC, Sinclair PM, Wolford LM. Soft tissue changes associated with double jaw surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992 : 101 : 266-75 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70096-S
  34. 이상빈, 김정호，장종언 : 성인에서 제 1소구치 발거를 통한 교정 치료후 측모의 변화. 대치협회지 2000: 38 : 369-77
  35. 김형돈, 박영철 제 l 소구치 발치를 동반한 제1급 치조성 양악 전돌환자의 치료 전,후 비교에 관한 연구 대치 교정지 1994: 24 : 149-59
  36. 김태경，유영규 :양악 전돌증 환자에서 소구치 발치를 통한 교정 치료시 입술 주위 연조직 변화에 관한 연구 내치 교정지 1994: 24 : 135- 47