WATER RESOURCES POLICY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN SOUTH KOREA : WIN-WIN STRATEGY

  • Choi, Yearn-Hong (Graduate School of Urban Sciences, University of Seoul) ;
  • Lee, Tae-Sam (Graduate School of Urban Sciences, University of Seoul)
  • Published : 2001.10.01

Abstract

Since South Korea has uneven rainfall and deteriorating water quality, it is imperative to create a comprehensive water resources policy and management. This paper is to adopt a win-win policy for upstream-downstream local governments that have been in water rights-related disputer or conflicts in the process of allocating water and maintaining water quality. The Win-Win Policy can be an integrated river-basin approach. We define the win-win policy, introduce the win-win case of Delaware River and Colorado River in the United States, and suggest the win-win policy for Nakdong River in South Korea. Nakdong River is chosen for this paper because it has more serious problems in preserving water quantity and maintaining water quality.

Keywords

References

  1. Colorado River Basin Commision. (1999). The 29th Annual Report and 2000 Annual Operating Plan for Colorado River System Reservoirs
  2. Fontane, Darrell G. (2000). Operation of the Colorado River System, Hanyang University and Kangwon Province-sponsored Conference on Water Resources Management, Seoul October 2000
  3. Kim, Sang-Ha. (1997). The Guide Book of Nakdong River, Nakdong River Committee NGO
  4. Korea Water Resources Corporation. (1998). Comparative Study on Water Management and Development Strategy, pp. 38-129
  5. Lord, William B. and Douglas S. Kinney. (1996). Resolving Interstate Water Dispute; Delaware River Basin Commision
  6. Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs. (1999). Dispute Examples in Local Autonomy Period
  7. Nagel, Stuart. (2000). Win-Win Policy for Developing and Industrial Nations: Six Examples, Dirksen-Stevenson Policy Institute and University of Illinois