Korean Journal of Cognitive Science (인지과학)

The Korean Society for Cognitive Science (한국인지과학회)
권호 표지

Knowledge Representation Characteristics of Categories and Scripts: An Investigation on Hierarchy and Typicality Effects

개념지식의 유형에 따른 표상차이: 범주와 각본의 위계성과 전형성 비교1)

  • 이재호 (중앙대학교 심리학과 겸임교수) ;
  • 이정모 (성균관대학교 심리학과)
  • Published : 2000.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate some characteristics of representation of category knowledge and script knowledge. Using primed lexical decision task with higher level primers in the representation structure, Experiment 1 examined the interaction effects between knowledge type and concept typicality. It was found that the concept typicality has some effects in category representation, while it has no significant effect in script representation. In Experiment 2, primers of the lower hierarchy in the representation structure were employed. The results showed that the main effect of knowledge type was significant: the response time for category knowledge was faster than that for script knowledge. Typicality effect did not show in this experiment. The results of t the two experiments suggest that category knowledge is represented in hierarchy and typicality. while script knowledge may lack in that characteristics. Other aspects of the differences in characteristics of category- and script- knowledge representation were discussed,

이 연구는 지식유형에 따른 표상 차이를 확인하기 위해서 범주지식과 각본지식의 위계성과 전형성에 대한 점화효과를 측정하였다. 실험 1에서는 상위개념을 점화단어로 제시하고 하위개념을 목표단어로 제시한 다움 목표단어의 어휘판단시간을 측정하였다. 그 결과, 범주지식은 전형단어가 비전형단어보다 반응시간이 빨랐지만, 각본지식은 두 조건간의 차이가 없었다. 실험 2에서는 하위개념을 점화단어로 제시하고 상위개념을 목표단어로 제시한 다음 목표단어의 어위판단시간을 측정하였다. 범주지식이 각본지식보다 반응시간이 빨랐으며, 두 지식 모두 전형성 효과는 관찰되지 않았다. 이러한 결과는 범주지식은 전형성에 따른 위계구조를 구성하지만 각본지식은 범주지식에 비해서 위계성과 전형성이 약회된 구조로 표상될 가능성을 시사하는 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Behavioral Brain Science v.22 Perceptual symbol systems Barsalou,L.W.
  2. 미발간 고려대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 범주의 속성정보의 유형이 범주화에 미치는 효과 오경기
  3. Categories and concepts Smith,E.E.;Medin,D.L.
  4. Annual Review of Psychology v.51 Are there kinds of concepts? Medin,D.L.;Lynch,E.B.;Solomon,K.O.
  5. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition v.21 Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming Moss,H.E.;Ostrin,R.K.;Tyler,L.K.;Marslen-Wilson,W.D.
  6. Journal of Memory and Language v.39 Components of objects and events Rips,L.J.;Estin,P.A.
  7. Cognitive Psychology v.38 Food for thought: Cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain Ross,B.;Murphy,G.L.
  8. Journal of Memory and Language v.24 The representation of scripts in memory Abbott,V.A.;Black,J.B.;Smith,E.E.
  9. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior v.21 Memory for routines Galambos,J.A.;Rips,L.J.
  10. Scripts. plans. goals. and understanding Schank,R.C.;Abelson,R.
  11. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지 v.9 덩이글의 외현적 정보와 내현적 지식이 추론과정에 미치는 효과: 대명사 참조해결과 스크립트 지식 서창원;이재호;장윤희
  12. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General v.112 On the emergence of semantic and conceptual distinctions Keil,F.C.
  13. Journal of Memory and Language v.24 Constrasting the representation of scripts and categories Barsalou,L.W.;Sewell,D.R.
  14. Brain and Language v.68 Semantic features and semantic categories: Differences in rapid activation of the lexicon Frenck-Mestre,C.;Bueno,S.
  15. 인지심리학의 제문제 II: 언어와 인지 언어 이해과정의 연구 방법 이재호;김성일;이정모;이재호 (편)
  16. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지 v.9 도구추론 온라인 생성 과정 이정모;이재호;김성일;이건효
  17. Neuropsychology v.9 Semantic priming of category relations in schizophrenia Ober,B.A.;Vinogradov,S.;Shenaut,G.K.
  18. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition v.15 Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: What a superordinate is good for Murphy,G.L.;Wisniewski,E.J.