• 분석과 대안
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.115-144
• /
• 2023

特朗普政府时期美国已表明了 "中国是美国的战略竞争者, 也是修正主义势力, 更是对美国繁荣和安全的主要挑战" 这种立场, 拜登政府也基本上继承了这种对中国的认识。中国也对此积极应对。因此, 美中战略竞争已成为当今国际体系中最重要的背景因素, 也对东北亚安全局势产生了巨大的影响。尽管如此, 观察最近韩美日三边安全合作的形成过程时我们可以发现, 尹锡悦总统上台之后韩国的对外战略调整对韩美日三边安全合作的形成起到了关键性作用。这是因为美国一如既往希望构建的韩美日三边安全合作的成败取决于韩日关系的改善, 而尹锡悦政府不顾韩国国内政治的制约因素, 果断推动了韩日关系的快速改善。随后, 在戴维营召开的韩美日三国峰会为未来三国在安全及其他更广泛领域的合作奠定了基础。中国对韩美日三边安全合作的形成提出了强烈的不满和抗议。但本文认为, 韩国虽然同意与美国和日本形成韩美日三边安全合作, 但韩国的战略目标与美国和日本的战略目标都不完全一致。比如, 回顾冷战结束之后的美日同盟发展历程, 美国与日本都对中国的崛起持有类似的看法和认识。最近几年美日同盟加强的实际目标也主要是如何应对中国的崛起。与此相反, 韩国历届政府都对韩美日三边安全合作持消极的态度。这是因为韩国想要追求的最主要的战略目标是如何减少或消除来自北韩的威胁, 而不是应对中国。面对北韩不断增强的挑衅与威胁, 过半数的韩国人支持通过加强韩美日三边安全合作来遏制或缓解来自北韩的威胁。因此, 只要北韩的核威胁与导弹挑衅持续存在, 那韩国的对外战略方向就很可能是加强韩美日三边安全合作, 以确保自身的安全与生存。所以, 如果中国想要减少韩美日三边安全合作给中国带来的战略上的压力, 最好的方案是降低北韩对韩国的挑衅和威胁, 在让北韩放弃核武器的问题上扮演更加实质性的角色。

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권40호
• /
• pp.190-215
• /
• 2016

As North Korea's asymmetric threats are growing, there have been numerous discussions to find out effective counter-measures and many official plans and procurements efforts have been established. However, discussions on ROK Navy's roles in countering North Korea's asymmetric threats have been taken place very limitedly. Decision makers and military planners put enormous efforts in getting counter-measures, however, most of the options on the table are systems of Army and Air Force. This is true if one looks at components of Kill-Chain, KAMD, and KMPR. With worsening security environment of the Korean peninsula, it has been said by many commentators that ROK Navy needs to consider expanding its roles in countering against North Korea's asymmetric military threats. They asked ROK Navy to go beyond the mind-set that has confined Navy's roles in deterring North Korean naval threats. That is, ROK Navy should fight 'from the sea' as well as fight 'on the sea.' If ROK Navy begins to think about fight 'from the sea,' there would be many possibilities for the Navy to be a part of countering North Korea's asymmetric military threats. In order to pursue proactive roles in countering North Korea's asymmetric threat, ROK Navy needs to consider various options. Massive missile forces, nuclear-propelled submarines, naval special forces may be some of them. With those measures, ROK Navy would launch massive and decisive attacks from the sea without risking survivability of our forces. Considering North Korean Navy's weakness, it is very probable that sea would be safer place than ground or sky. Expanding ROK Navy's roles and being a proactive deterrent forces against North Korean asymmetric threats would provide very reliable counter-measures to South Korean military. Thus, military planners should think how to take the best advantage of expanded ROK Navy's roles and capabilities against North Korean asymmetric threats.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권42호
• /
• pp.258-292
• /
• 2017

This paper is designed to make a national strategic concept for the ROK's maritime security and to explore cooperation directions for the ROK Navy and Coast Guard in order to implement the newly-made maritime security strategic concept. As strategy is composed of three main categories(goals, ways, means), the goal of the ROK's maritime security strategy is 'Safe and Affluent Sea' and the way to realize the goal is the principle of cooperative leverage, and the means as tasks to implement the strategic concept are maritime safety, maritime security, and maritime stewardship. The concept of national fleet as used in the US is applied to promoting the cooperation between the ROK Navy and Coast Guard. Thus, under the newly-established maritime security strategic concept along with the national fleet model, followings are suggested as policy proposals for facilitating mutual cooperation between the ROK Navy and Coast Guard in dealing with not only traditional threats but also non-traditional treats at sea and from the sea as well. First, the ROK Navy and Coast Guard has been making efforts to enhance interoperability between the two sea services. However, the mutual cooperations have been focused mainly on areas on operational level rather than policy level. Therefore, the two sea services are recommended to enlarge exchanges and cooperation in policy areas. Second, there are still demands for further cooperation areas between the two sea services in command and communications. The interoperability in C2 between the two needs to be upgraded even to the areas of anti-terrorist activities ar sea, ASUW, ASW, maritime interdiction, etc. Third, mutual comparability between the two needs to be reflected in the maritime forces development to ensure the comparability in UNREP and other logistics areas. Fourth, the standardization of logistical materials and equipments is needed as a way of sustaining operational capability and logistical capacity for the ROK Navy and Coast Guard as well. Fifth, the ROK Navy and Coast Guard are recommended to participate more actively in international maritime cooperation activities such as PASSEX. Sixth, Complementary laws and regulations need further to be revised and to be newly made for collectively managing swiftly maritime accidents and natural disasters at sea.

• 한국시뮬레이션학회논문지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.23-32
• /
• 2008

본 논문에서 한미 워게임 모델 상호운용성의 현 실태와 향후 비전에 대해 연구하고 미래의 페더레이션 구조를 제안한다. 한국군과 미군은 1999년부터 작전요구를 충족하기 위한 한미 워게임 모델의 상호운용성 향상을 위해 노력해 왔다. 현 상태에서 목표를 달성하기 위해 아직도 수행해야 할 과정이 더 남아 있지만 최종목표에 어느 정도 근접한 상태이다. 한미 워게임 체계의 기술적인 장점과 시스템 가용도를 고려한 향후 한미 워게임 체계 상호운용성 향상을 위한 시스템 구조를 제시한다. 이러한 새로운 체계는 한국군이 주도하는 향후 한미 연합연습과 한국군 자체 합동연습시 운용될 시뮬레이션 구조라고 할 수 있다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제18권7호
• /
• pp.577-589
• /
• 2018

한미동맹의 변화를 추동하는 요인이 제기되고 있다. 그러나 한국과 미국은 정부 차원에서 한미동맹의 미래 구상 논의를 2000년대 초 이후 사실상 중단한 상태이고 민간 차원의 연구도 활발하지 못하다. 동맹 변화를 추동하는 요인은 한국과 미국 내 행정부 교체에 따른 정책 성향의 변화, 북핵 해결과정에서 제기되고 있는 한미동맹의 조정 요구, 동맹의 운용 제체와 성격을 바꿀 수 있는 전작권의 조속한 전환 추진, 한국의 중국 경사론에 대한 미국의 불신, 사드 사태에서 경험한 중국의 한미동맹 관련 주요 의제에 대한 문제제기, 미중 양국에 의한 한반도 주요 사안 결정 등이 있다. 한미동맹의 미래 구상을 구체화하는 작업을 한국과 미국이 수행한다면 도전 요인에 효과적으로 대응할 수 있다. 본 논문은 한미동맹 변화의 추동요인을 분석한 후 동맹의 미래 구상을 안보환경 변화와 연계하여 제시하였다. 현상유지, 화해협력, 통일단계로 한반도 안보환경 변화를 상정하고 각각의 단계에서 동맹의 목표, 주한미군의 역할, 동맹 운용 체제, 고려 사항 등을 제시하였다. 동맹의 발전 방안을 한미가 미리 협의하고 합의한다면 향후 불확실성을 제거하고 동맹의 안정성과 연속성을 담보할 수 있을 것이다.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권30호
• /
• pp.5-30
• /
• 2012

Jointness is a core concept of ROK military reform plan. ROK military has pursued to transform its military organization and capability for enhancing jointness and joint operation after the 1990s. It has strengthened the organization of JCS(Joint Chief of Staffs), introduced joint education, and acquired modernized weapons and equipment proper for joint operation. The 1986 Glodwater-Nichols Act of the U.S. military and lessons of the recent war provided a good direction how ROK military should take measures to enhance jointenss. In fact, defense reform efforts for jointness has produced invaluable fruits for transforming industrial age military forces into information age one which possesses more strong combat capabilities and develops joint business for efficient defense management. Nevertheless, there are many issues ROK military should address for stepping up the jointness. This paper well analyzes practical problems and issues ROK military faces to develop jointenss and draws policy recommendations for the policy makers.

• 방사성폐기물학회지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.383-395
• /
• 2023

Since 1997, the Republic of Korea (ROK) has been developing pyro-processing (Pyro) technology to reduce the disposal burden of high-level radioactive waste by recycling spent nuclear fuel (SNF). Compared to plutonium and uranium extraction process, Korean Pyro technology has relatively excellent proliferation resistance that cannot separate pure plutonium owing to its intrinsic characteristics. Regarding Pyro technology development of ROK, the Bush administration considered that Pyro is not reprocessing under the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership, whereas the Obama administration considered that Pyro is subject to reprocessing. However, the Bush and Obama administrations did not allow ROK to conduct full Pyro activities using SNF, even though ROK had faithfully complied with international nonproliferation obligations. This is because the US nuclear nonproliferation policy to prevent the spread of sensitive technologies, such as enrichment and reprocessing, has a strong effect on ROK, unlike Japan, on a bilateral level beyond the NPT regime for non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제27권5호
• /
• pp.17-26
• /
• 2018

In 1961, the Republic of Korea's first newly-constructed government building was completed. The government building, as ROK office, was erected as a twin with the USOM office in Sejong-ro. The reason why the ROK office and the USOM office were erected as a twin building is that the two offices were part of Foreign Operation Administration's Seoul Buildings Project in 1954. Within the project, the FOA office and the ROK office were rarely separated, and naturally, the ROK office was built according to the US standards. The planning, design, and construction phases which led by the US government were involved in the US architecture, engineering-construction companies. Because those AEC companies were familiar with the US technology and standards. In the phase of construction, Korean companies took part in the process under the supervise of Vinnell Corporation. The US expected to transfer its 'modern' and 'developed' technology through this process. The completed ROK office was widely known as the 'modern style (hyundae-sik)' building, which was body forth as glasses and new facilities. These factors were what the US emphasized for exporting architecture. The modifier, 'modern style (hyundae-sik)', given to the ROK office in the 1950s was a synonym for any new feeling that had never been seen hitherto. The newness of the ROK office, the 'modern style (hyundae-sik)' building, was specified as materials and facilities that indicates modern technology while in the absence of adequate knowledge.

• 미생물학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.37-41
• /
• 1992

Saccharomjyces cerevisiae에서 KEM1 유전자는 세포분열시 microtubules과 spindle pole body 구조체의 새로운 기능에 관여하는 것으로 알려져 있다. KEM1과 유사하거나 연관이 있는 기능을 갖는 새로운 유전자들을 찾는 목적으로 kem1 돌연변이의 high copy suppressor 유전자, ROK1, 를 찾아냈다. ROK1은 high copy 플라스미드에 클로닝되었을 때 kem1을 suppression 하고, low copy 플라스미드에서는 suppression 하지 않는다. kem1 돌연변이의 benomyl에 대한 민감성과 Kar enhancing 표현서을 동시에 suppression 하는 두 개의 클론을 분리하였으며, 제한요소로 분석했을 때 9.0kb의 insert 를 지닌 동일한 클론이었다. 이 suppressor 유전자 ROK1의 제한지도를 작성하였고, 그 결과 KEM1 이 아닌 다른 유전자인 것으로 나타났다. Suncloning 실험으로 ROK1은 적어도 3.0kb의 기능부위를 갖음을 확인했다.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제16권6_1호
• /
• pp.15-24
• /
• 2016

인천상륙작전은 1950년 9월 15일에 연합군과 한국 해병대가 실시한 한반도 최초의 연합상륙작전이었다. 인천상륙작전의 역사적 의의는 낙동강방어전선에서 반격을 위한 공세이전으로 전환시켜 수도 서울 탈환이라는 계기를 마련하였다는 점에 있다. 인천상륙작전간 한국해병대는 미군들의 주요지휘관들로부터 "한국 해병대의 철저한 전투수행에는 어떠한 결함도 발견할 수 없었다"고 격찬을 받으면서 위국헌신의 희생정신으로 한국해병대의 위용을 전 세계에 과시하였다. 오늘날 우리 해병대가 국민들에게 사랑과 신뢰를 받으면서 국민의 군대로서 성장할 수 있었던 것은 평시 강한 훈련을 통하여 유사시를 대비했기 때문이었다. 앞으로도 장병들의 주적개념과 국가관을 확립토록 정신교육을 강화하고 또한 강한 훈련을 통하여 싸우면 반드시 이긴다라는 자신감을 배양토록 힘써야 할 것이다. 특히 구타 및 가혹행위 등의 잘못된 전통을 척결하여야 할 것이다. 선배해병들의 피와 땀과 눈물어린 전통을 보다 계승 발전시켜 국민에게 신뢰받는 해병대가 되도록 최선을 다해야 할 것이다.