• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.366-369
• /
• 1999

관골 골절을 분류할 때 주위의 해부학적인 구조물과 연관해서 기능적인 면에 중점을 두어야 하므로 복시나 내안증같은 합병증이 나타날 수 있는 안와골절을 포함하는 분류를 해야한다. 관골 골절의 변위에 따라 나타나는 합병증의 양상이 매우 다양하므로 진단에 도움이 될 수 있도록 지속적인 연구가 필요할 것으로 사료되며, 초창기에 이러한 임상적인 합병증이 나타나지 않더라도 추후에 발생할 가능성이 있기 때문에 이를 간과해서는 안될 것으로 사료된다.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.103-113
• /
• 1990

The study was based on a series of 252 patient with facial bone fractures who visited to Chun Cheon Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University during the period of Dec., 1984 trough Nov., 1989. The results obtained are as follows; 1. The most frequent etiologic factor was traffic accident(45.2%). 2. The ratio of male to female was 5.5 : 1 and 2nd decade(44%) was the highest age group in incidence. 3. Monthly incidence was the highest in Aug(14.3%). 4. The most common site of fracture was mandible(55.3%) and zygoma complex(24.2%), nasal bone(11.6%), maxilla(8.9%) were next in order of frequeny. 5. In mandible fractures, the most frequent site was symphyseal area(36.9%) and 142 cases(85%) had fractures only in mandible. 6. In maxillary fractures, fracture with other facial bones(85.2%) was more frequent than fracture on maxilla only. The major fracture type on maxilla was Le Fort II type. 7. In fracture of zygoma complex, zygoma & zygomatic arch was the most frequent site(52.0%) and zygomatic arch(24.7%), zygoma(23.3%) were next in order. 8. Open reduction was major method of treatment in facial bone fractures except nasal bone ; mandible(62.9%), maxilla(77.8%), zygoma complex(65.8%). 9. Maxillofacial fractures were most frequently combined with head & neck injury(43.1%), and upp. & low. extremities(29.4%), chest and abdomen(11.9%) were in order of frequency.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제38권6호
• /
• pp.851-860
• /
• 2011

Purpose: Reduction by simply assembling bones is recognized as treatment for a zygoma fracture. However, in patients who originally had a protruding zygoma, the fractured parts look like malarplasty after the edema subsides, giving a soft impression which patients notice. Thus, we created symmetry through simultaneous contralateral malar reduction in a unilateral zygoma fracture. Methods: In this study, the patients who had surgery between July, 2008 and December, 2009 with admission were object. In 76 patients with a zygoma fracture, the patients with bilateral zygoma fractures were excluded. Among 48 patients who had a reduction only after a unilateral zygoma fracture, the patients hoping for a reduction of their rough protruding zygoma were analyzed with front cephalometry. The study progressed on 22 patients who had simultaneous contralateral malar reduction in a unilateral zygoma fracture with consent. After fixing the fracture, we did a straight zygoma osteotomy through a 1.5 cm intraoral incision. After that, we created symmetry with a special ruler and fixed the broken zygomatic arch with a screw and plate. We evaluated the facial index and satisfaction with a statistical analysis before and after the surgery. Results: In 22 patients, there was no reoperation except for 1 patient who had a zygoma fracture. None of the patients were treated for infection or hematoma. Two patients complained of paresthesia after the malar reduction operation, but this subsided in 4 months. Most of them were satisfied with the malar reduction, especially the women, and we obtained a better mid facial contour with decreased facial width ($p$ <0.05). Conclusion: Existing zygoma fracture surgery focuses on anatomical reduction. However, we need to have a cosmetic viewpoint in fractures as interests of face contour arise. Thus, contralateral malar reduction got a 4.7 (range 0~5) from patients who had malar reduction surgery in our hospital. Although adjusting to all zygoma fractures has limitations, it can be a new method in zygoma fractures when there are limited indications of protruding zygoma and careful attention is given to patients' high demands.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제38권6호
• /
• pp.783-790
• /
• 2011

Purpose: The zygoma (Zygomaticomaxillary) complexes make up a large portion of the orbital floor and lateral orbital walls. Zygoma fracture frequently causes the posteromedial displacement of bone fragments, and the collapse or overlapping of internal orbital walls. This process consequently can lead to the orbital volume change. The reduction of zygoma in an anterolateral direction may influence on the potential bone defect area of the internal orbital walls. Thus we performed the quantitative analysis of orbital volume change in zygoma fracture before and after operation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography scans in 39 patients with zygoma fractures who had not carried out orbital wall reconstruction. Orbital volume measurement was obtained through Aquarius Ver. 4.3.6 program and we compared the orbital volume change of injured orbit with that of the normal contralateral orbit. Results: The average orbital volume of normal orbit was 19.68 $cm^3$. Before the operation, the average orbital volume of injured orbit was 18.42 $cm^3$. The difference of the orbital volume between the injured orbit and the normal orbit was 1.18 $cm^3$ (6.01%) on average. After operation, the average orbital volume of injured orbit was 20.81 $cm^3$. The difference of the orbital volume between the injured orbit and the normal orbit was 1.17 $cm^3$ (5.92%) on average. Conclusion: There are considerable volume changes in zygoma fracture which did not accompany internal orbital wall fracture before and after operation. Our study reflects the change of bony frame, also that of all parts of the orbital wall, in addition to the bony defect area of orbital floor, in an isolated zygoma fracture so that it evaluates orbital volume change more accurately. Thus, the measurement of orbital volume in isolated zygoma fractures helps predict the degree of enophthalmos and decide a surgical plan.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.396-406
• /
• 1995

This is a clinical and retrospective study who sustained a total of 306 maxillofacial bone fracture and who were treated in our department between 1990-1994. This results were obtained as follows : 1. The ratio of men to women was 3.2 : 1. 2. The age frequency was the highest in the third decade(35%). That of man was the highest in the third decade but that of women in the fourth decade. 3. In respect of incidence, the number of patients has not been increased year after year. There were the highest frequency in September and the lowest frequency in January. 4. The most frequent cause of facial bone fracture was fall down(40.2%), traffic accident(28.1%), fist blow(20.9%), industrial accident(6.2%) and others in order. 5. The most common location of facial bone fracture was mandible(69%), maxillar with zygoma and zygoma in order of frequency. 6. The age frequency of mandible was the third decade(36.5%), the fourth decade(23.2%) and the fourth decade(22.2%) and the fifth decade(15.6%) in order. 7. In respect of incidence of associated injuries, the ratio of absence to presence was 0.7 : 1. 8. In 306 patients of facial bone fracture, the frequency of associated injuries was laceration, extrimities, chest in order.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.21-31
• /
• 1989

This is a series of continuing research on facial bone fractures of Koreans worked by Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Dental College of Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, since 1972. The study was based on a series of 630 patients with facial bone fractures treated as in-patient at Yonsei Medical Center, Yonsei University, during the period of Jan., 1982 through Dec., 1987. The results obtained are as follows: 1. The ratio of Men to Women was 4.3 : 1, and admissions for facial bone fractures have been increased year after 1984. 2. The age frequency was highest in the third decade(38.3%), and fourth, second, fifth decade in orders. 3. The traffic accident was the most frequent cause of facial bone fractures (51.3%). 4. The most common location of facial bone fractures was the Mandible(35.3%), and Zygoma complex(29.8%), Nasal bone(15.0%), Maxilla(11.0%) were next in order of frequency. 5. In 291 patients of Mandible fractures, 226(77.7%) had fractures only in Mandible and 65(22.3%) had another facial bone fractures. The most frequent fracture site of Mandible was the Symphysis(43.0%) and Angle(22.4%), and Simple fracture was the most frequent in type of fracture(66.9%). Intermaxillary fixatin & Open reduction was major method of treatment(36.9%). 6. In 394 patients of Midface fractures 323)82.0%) had fractures only in Midface and 71(18.0%) had another facial bone fractures. The most frequent site of Midface fractures was zygoma complex & zygomatic arch(42.7%), and Simple fracture was the most common type of fractures. Observation(Maxilla :44.2%, Zygoma :51.0%) and Open Reduction(Maxilla :20.0%. Zygoma :23.5%) were the major method of treatment. 7. The frequency of Nasal bone fracture was about 1/5 of Midface fractures, and Closed Reduction(45.2%) was the major method of treatment. 8. The complication was reported in only 16 patients, and Malunion was the major complication. 9. Head(44.4%), Lower extrimities(14.5%) and Eye(12.3%) were injured commonly with facial bone fractures. 10. The elapsed time from injury to hospital was within 24 hours in 73.8% of patients, however 15.5% of patients arrived the hospital 72 hours after injury.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 1989

This is a retrospective study on maxillofacial fractures. This study was based on a series of 442 patients with maxillofacial fractures treated at Dept, of oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Chon Buk National University from Jan, 1984 to Sep. 1988. The results obtained were as follows: 1. The ratio of Male/Female was 4.8 : 1, and 3rd decade (43.9%) was the highest age group in incidence. 2. Monthly incidence was the highest in Oct,(10.6%). 3. The most frequent maxillofacial fracture site was mandible (70.0%), and zygoma & zygomatic arch (13.6%), maxilla(11.7%) and nasal bone (4.7%) were next in order of frequency. 4. Traffic accidents (47.5%), fight(24.8%) were the most common causes of maxillofacial fractures. 5. The most frequent chief complaint was painful swelling(40.7%). 6. In mandibular fractures, the most frequent fracture site was symphyseal area(28.9%) and simple fracture was the most frequent in type of fracture (71.2%). 7. In maxillary fractures, fracture with other facial bones (64.5%) was more frequent than fracture of maxilla only. The most common type of fracture was unilateral fractures(37.1%). 8. In fracture of zygoma complex, zygoma fracture was the most frequent fracture type(40.3%), zygoma and zygomatic arch fx, (30.6%), zygomatic arch fx, (29.1%) were next in order 9. Open reduction was major method of treatment in maxillofacial fractures : Mandible (77.5%), Maxilla (61.3%), Zygoma complex(43.1%). 10. Maxillofacial fractures were most frequently combined with head injury(39.3%), and lower extremities(17.0%), upper extremities(13.6%) were next in order.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.89-98
• /
• 1994

This study was based on a series of 213 patients with facial bone fractures treated at college of Medicine, Dong-A university from Mar. 1990 to Jun. 1993. The results obtained were as follows : 1. The ratio of male to female was 8.3 : 1 and 3rd decade(34.3%) was the highest age group in incidence. 2. Monthly incidence was the highest in Jan. & Jun.(10.3%) 3. Onset time and daily incidence was the highest in pm. 9:00-12:00(21.4%), Sunday(18.8%). 4. Traffic acidents(38.5%) were the most frequent etiologic factor. 5. The most common site of fracture was zygoma & zygomatic arch(42.3%) and mandible (37.8%), maxilla (10.9%) and nasal bone(9.0%) were next in order of frequency. 6. In mandible fractures, the most frequent site was symphyseal area(43.0%) and IMF & open reduction was major method of treatment. 7. In zygoma & zygomatic arch fractures, zygoma(62.0%) was the most common fracture site and open reduction was the most frequent treatment method. 8. In maxilla fractures, the major fracture type was Le Fort I type (72.4%) and treatment was done by IMF & open reduction primarily. 9. postoperative complications were mal-union, fibrous-union, infection, osteomyelitis etc.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.455-460
• /
• 2007

Purpose: Aging society was realized after persons over 65 was rated above 7% in 2000. It is inevitable fact that society gets older. Few study about facial bone fracture in elderly was reported until now. This study provides a retrospective statistical analysis of facial bone fracture and reports of some demographical information from medical records. Methods: From January 2000 to December 2005, 123 cases of facial bone fracture in above 55 year-old persons were reviewed and analysed. Statistic data was related to distribution, age, sex, causes, occupations, occurrence, time, incidence of facial bone fracture, treatment and it's complications. Results: Facial bone fractures in elderly tend to increase and rated to 4.7%. Facial bone fractures in elderly were most frequently occurred in farmers, cultivator accidents and zygoma fractures. A few minor complications were checked, but easily improved. Conclusion: Facial bone fractures in elderly have small proportion of the whole facial bone fractures, but gradually have been increased. This study was observed trends in changes of facial bone fracture in elderly for 5 years and expected to provide statistical index to prevent facial bone fracture in elderly.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.22-31
• /
• 1996

본 교실에서는 1994년 11월부터 1996년 4월까지 수상 후 혹은 일차 교정 후 평균 3.2개월 경과한, 7명의 환자에서 제한된 접근방식으로 2차석 교정술을 시행하여 평균 4.5개월의 추적 조사한 후 만족할 만한 결과를 얻었으며 다음과 같은 결론을 내렸다. 1. 술전에 X-ray 검토, 사고 전의 사진, 충분한 대화 등을 토대로 가능한 정확한 절골선과 변형정도 등의 교정을 위한 계측이 필요하다. 2. 관골의 삼각골절 후 안면변형인 경우는 반드시 광범위 노출법보다는 제한적 방법으로 교정이 가능했다. 3. 절골된 관골은 내측 및 전상방으로 과교정해야 한다. 4. 절골 및 재배치시 저작근을 포함하여 주위 연부조직을 분리시키는 것이 중요하다. 5 안구함몰의 교정을 위해서 안와기저부 및 측부에 자가 골이식이나 고밀도 폴리에틸렌($Medpor^{(R)}$)의 삽입 후 결과의 차이는 발견할 수 없었다.