• Title/Summary/Keyword: wellhole stability

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

Stability Analysis for the Pohang Deep Geothermal Borehole (포항 심부 지열 시추공의 안정성 분석 연구)

  • Lee, Min-Jung;Chang, Chan-Dong;Lee, Jun-Bok;Lee, Tae-Jong;Hwang, Se-Ho
    • Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration
    • /
    • v.11 no.3
    • /
    • pp.204-213
    • /
    • 2008
  • This paper presents the analysis about the stability of the Pohang deep geothermal borehole drilled in 2006. Severe wellhole instability problems such as collapse and tight hole occurred in weak rocks while drilling. Optimal mud pressure (mud window) required to prevent instability problems during drilling is obtained from analysis on in-situ stress and rock strength. The window is bounded by vertical stress in its upper limit and by either collapse pressure or pore pressure in its lower limit. Mud window varies with different types of rocks. In the top-most semi-consolidated mudstone formation, no mud window can secure borehole stability. In some weak rock types (basic dyke and crystal tuff), the borehole pressure needs to be higher by $50{\sim}60%$ than hydrostatic pressure. That means a mud density of 1.5 g/$cm^3$ or higher should be applied during drilling in order to prevent excessive collapse around the borehole.

Empirical Rock Strength Logging in Boreholes Penetrating Sedimentary Formations (퇴적암에 대한 경험적 암석강도 추정에 대한 고찰)

  • Chang, Chan-Dong
    • Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration
    • /
    • v.7 no.3
    • /
    • pp.174-183
    • /
    • 2004
  • The knowledge of rock strength is important in assessing wellbore stability problems, effective sanding, and the estimation of in situ stress field. Numerous empirical equations that relate unconfined compressive strength of sedimentary rocks (sandstone, shale, and limestone, and dolomite) to physical properties (such as velocity, elastic modulus, and porosity) are collected and reviewed. These equations can be used to estimate rock strength from parameters measurable with geophysical well logs. Their ability to fit laboratory-measured strength and physical property data that were compiled from the literature is reviewed. While some equations work reasonably well (for example, some strength-porosity relationships for sandstone and shale), rock strength variations with individual physical property measurements scatter considerably, indicating that most of the empirical equations are not sufficiently generic to fit all the data published on rock strength and physical properties. This emphasizes the importance of local calibration before one utilizes any of the empirical relationships presented. Nonetheless, some reasonable correlations can be found between geophysical properties and rock strength that can be useful for applications related to wellhole stability where haying a lower bound estimate of in situ rock strength is especially useful.