무인기 기반 RGB 영상 활용 U-Net을 이용한 수수 재배지 분할 (Sorghum Field Segmentation with U-Net from UAV RGB)
-
- 대한원격탐사학회지
- /
- 제39권5_1호
- /
- pp.521-535
- /
- 2023
논·밭 전환 시 수수(sorghum bicolor L. Moench)는 뛰어난 내습성으로 콩과 함께 안정적인 생산이 가능하여 국내 식량작물의 자급률 향상과 쌀 수급 불균형 문제를 해결할 수 있을 것으로 기대되는 작물이다. 그러나 수량 추정을 위한 재배면적과 같은 기본적인 통계조사는 많은 인력을 투입하여도 오래 걸리는 전통적인 조사 방식으로 인해 잘 이루어 지지 않고 있다. 이에 따라 본 연구에서는 무인기 기반 RGB 영상에 U-Net을 적용하여 수수 재배지 비파괴적 분할가능성을 확인하였다. 2022년에 7월 28일, 8월 13일, 8월 25일에 각각 영상이 취득되었다. 각 영상취득 날짜에서 512 × 512 영상크기로 훈련데이터셋 6,000장과 검증데이터셋 1,000장으로 나누어 학습을 진행하였으며 수수 농경지(sorghum), 벼와 콩 농경지(others)와 비 농경지(background)로 구성된 세 개 클래스와 수수 농경지와 배경(others+background)으로 구성된 두 개 클래스 기반으로 분류모델을 개발하였다. 모든 취득 날짜에서 세 개 클래스 기반 모델에서는 수수 재배지 분류 정확도가 0.91 이상으로 나타났지만 8월 데이터셋의 others 클래스에서 학습 혼동이 일어났다. 대조적으로 두 개 클래스 기반 모델에서는 8월 데이터셋의 안정적인 학습과 함께 모든 클래스에서 0.95 이상의 정확도를 나타내었다. 결과적으로 8월에 두개클래스 기반 모델을 현장에 재현하는 것이 수수 재배지 분류를 통한 재배면적 산출에 유리할 것으로 판단된다.
국내에 중국인의 유입이 증가하면서 중국 이주민 거주지가 많이 생겨나고 있다. 이러한 이주민 거주지역은 도시내의 독특한 경관을 형성할 뿐 아니라 도시경관에 있어서 문화적 다양성이 드러나고 있다. 그래서 본 연구에서는 중국 이주민 거주지 내의 시장공간을 대상으로 문화경관을 해석하고자 한다. 연구대상지는 서울시 영등포구 대림동 중국 이주민 거주지내의 중앙시장으로 하였으며, 연구방법은 참여관찰법이다. 본 연구의 결과를 요약해 보면 다음과 같다. 중국인 상인들은 보행자 도로에 탄즈나 상품더미와 같은 개인의 물건을 놓고 거기서 상행위를 하고 있으며, 큰 규모의 차양을 설치하여 보행자 도로를 완전 점유함으로써 보행자 도로를 가게의 내부공간으로 변형시켰다. 또한 보행자 도로를 이용하는 행인들은 차량용 도로를 통해 이동하게 되어 차량용 도로가 자동차만의 공간일 뿐 아니라 보행자를 위한 공간으로 변형하게 되었다. 이러한 변화를 통하여 원상태의 공간분류인 건물 - 보행자 도로 - 차량용 도로에서 건물 - 보도 및 탄즈 겸용공간 - 차도 및 보도의 겸용공간으로 변형되었다. 중국인 거주자에 의해서 중앙시장의 공간의 이용행태는 원상태의 공간의 이용행태하고는 본질적으로 다르며, 공간 구분에서도 기존의 공간구분과는 다르다. 그리고 이러한 공간에 대하여 중국 이주자들이 어떻게 인지하는지를 살펴보면 먼저 중앙시장에서 상행위를 하는 중국상인은 가게공간에서 탄즈와 같은 중국식 시설물을 설치함으로써 공간을 이용하기가 편리한 공간으로 인식하고 있었다. 그리고 중앙시장을 이용하는 중국인 고객은 중앙시장을 중국의 음식이나 일상용품을 쉽게 구매할 수 있는 공간으로 생각하고 있었다. 또한 중앙시장의 경관이 중국현지 경관과 유사하다고 생각하고 있어 이 공간을 친근하고 익숙한 공간으로 생각하고 있었다. 이처럼 중앙시장은 중국인이 중심이 되는 소비의 공간이자 한국 안에 위치하는 작은 중국으로 생각하고 있었다. 본 연구의 결과는 차이나타운의 건설 시 중국인 거주자의 입장에서 계획이 될 수 있도록 이론적 기초자료로 활용될 수 있다. 또한 참여관찰법을 통한 연구는 실질적이고 깊이 있는 정보를 현장에서 직접 수집하는 방법으로 조경분야에서도 정보를 수집하는데 방법론적 의미를 가질 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.
The objective of this research is to test the feasibility of developing a statewide truck traffic forecasting methodology for Wisconsin by using Origin-Destination surveys, traffic counts, classification counts, and other data that are routinely collected by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT). Development of a feasible model will permit estimation of future truck traffic for every major link in the network. This will provide the basis for improved estimation of future pavement deterioration. Pavement damage rises exponentially as axle weight increases, and trucks are responsible for most of the traffic-induced damage to pavement. Consequently, forecasts of truck traffic are critical to pavement management systems. The pavement Management Decision Supporting System (PMDSS) prepared by WisDOT in May 1990 combines pavement inventory and performance data with a knowledge base consisting of rules for evaluation, problem identification and rehabilitation recommendation. Without a r.easonable truck traffic forecasting methodology, PMDSS is not able to project pavement performance trends in order to make assessment and recommendations in the future years. However, none of WisDOT's existing forecasting methodologies has been designed specifically for predicting truck movements on a statewide highway network. For this research, the Origin-Destination survey data avaiiable from WisDOT, including two stateline areas, one county, and five cities, are analyzed and the zone-to'||'&'||'not;zone truck trip tables are developed. The resulting Origin-Destination Trip Length Frequency (00 TLF) distributions by trip type are applied to the Gravity Model (GM) for comparison with comparable TLFs from the GM. The gravity model is calibrated to obtain friction factor curves for the three trip types, Internal-Internal (I-I), Internal-External (I-E), and External-External (E-E). ~oth "macro-scale" calibration and "micro-scale" calibration are performed. The comparison of the statewide GM TLF with the 00 TLF for the macro-scale calibration does not provide suitable results because the available 00 survey data do not represent an unbiased sample of statewide truck trips. For the "micro-scale" calibration, "partial" GM trip tables that correspond to the 00 survey trip tables are extracted from the full statewide GM trip table. These "partial" GM trip tables are then merged and a partial GM TLF is created. The GM friction factor curves are adjusted until the partial GM TLF matches the 00 TLF. Three friction factor curves, one for each trip type, resulting from the micro-scale calibration produce a reasonable GM truck trip model. A key methodological issue for GM. calibration involves the use of multiple friction factor curves versus a single friction factor curve for each trip type in order to estimate truck trips with reasonable accuracy. A single friction factor curve for each of the three trip types was found to reproduce the 00 TLFs from the calibration data base. Given the very limited trip generation data available for this research, additional refinement of the gravity model using multiple mction factor curves for each trip type was not warranted. In the traditional urban transportation planning studies, the zonal trip productions and attractions and region-wide OD TLFs are available. However, for this research, the information available for the development .of the GM model is limited to Ground Counts (GC) and a limited set ofOD TLFs. The GM is calibrated using the limited OD data, but the OD data are not adequate to obtain good estimates of truck trip productions and attractions .. Consequently, zonal productions and attractions are estimated using zonal population as a first approximation. Then, Selected Link based (SELINK) analyses are used to adjust the productions and attractions and possibly recalibrate the GM. The SELINK adjustment process involves identifying the origins and destinations of all truck trips that are assigned to a specified "selected link" as the result of a standard traffic assignment. A link adjustment factor is computed as the ratio of the actual volume for the link (ground count) to the total assigned volume. This link adjustment factor is then applied to all of the origin and destination zones of the trips using that "selected link". Selected link based analyses are conducted by using both 16 selected links and 32 selected links. The result of SELINK analysis by u~ing 32 selected links provides the least %RMSE in the screenline volume analysis. In addition, the stability of the GM truck estimating model is preserved by using 32 selected links with three SELINK adjustments, that is, the GM remains calibrated despite substantial changes in the input productions and attractions. The coverage of zones provided by 32 selected links is satisfactory. Increasing the number of repetitions beyond four is not reasonable because the stability of GM model in reproducing the OD TLF reaches its limits. The total volume of truck traffic captured by 32 selected links is 107% of total trip productions. But more importantly, ~ELINK adjustment factors for all of the zones can be computed. Evaluation of the travel demand model resulting from the SELINK adjustments is conducted by using screenline volume analysis, functional class and route specific volume analysis, area specific volume analysis, production and attraction analysis, and Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) analysis. Screenline volume analysis by using four screenlines with 28 check points are used for evaluation of the adequacy of the overall model. The total trucks crossing the screenlines are compared to the ground count totals. L V/GC ratios of 0.958 by using 32 selected links and 1.001 by using 16 selected links are obtained. The %RM:SE for the four screenlines is inversely proportional to the average ground count totals by screenline .. The magnitude of %RM:SE for the four screenlines resulting from the fourth and last GM run by using 32 and 16 selected links is 22% and 31 % respectively. These results are similar to the overall %RMSE achieved for the 32 and 16 selected links themselves of 19% and 33% respectively. This implies that the SELINICanalysis results are reasonable for all sections of the state.Functional class and route specific volume analysis is possible by using the available 154 classification count check points. The truck traffic crossing the Interstate highways (ISH) with 37 check points, the US highways (USH) with 50 check points, and the State highways (STH) with 67 check points is compared to the actual ground count totals. The magnitude of the overall link volume to ground count ratio by route does not provide any specific pattern of over or underestimate. However, the %R11SE for the ISH shows the least value while that for the STH shows the largest value. This pattern is consistent with the screenline analysis and the overall relationship between %RMSE and ground count volume groups. Area specific volume analysis provides another broad statewide measure of the performance of the overall model. The truck traffic in the North area with 26 check points, the West area with 36 check points, the East area with 29 check points, and the South area with 64 check points are compared to the actual ground count totals. The four areas show similar results. No specific patterns in the L V/GC ratio by area are found. In addition, the %RMSE is computed for each of the four areas. The %RMSEs for the North, West, East, and South areas are 92%, 49%, 27%, and 35% respectively, whereas, the average ground counts are 481, 1383, 1532, and 3154 respectively. As for the screenline and volume range analyses, the %RMSE is inversely related to average link volume. 'The SELINK adjustments of productions and attractions resulted in a very substantial reduction in the total in-state zonal productions and attractions. The initial in-state zonal trip generation model can now be revised with a new trip production's trip rate (total adjusted productions/total population) and a new trip attraction's trip rate. Revised zonal production and attraction adjustment factors can then be developed that only reflect the impact of the SELINK adjustments that cause mcreases or , decreases from the revised zonal estimate of productions and attractions. Analysis of the revised production adjustment factors is conducted by plotting the factors on the state map. The east area of the state including the counties of Brown, Outagamie, Shawano, Wmnebago, Fond du Lac, Marathon shows comparatively large values of the revised adjustment factors. Overall, both small and large values of the revised adjustment factors are scattered around Wisconsin. This suggests that more independent variables beyond just 226; population are needed for the development of the heavy truck trip generation model. More independent variables including zonal employment data (office employees and manufacturing employees) by industry type, zonal private trucks 226; owned and zonal income data which are not available currently should be considered. A plot of frequency distribution of the in-state zones as a function of the revised production and attraction adjustment factors shows the overall " adjustment resulting from the SELINK analysis process. Overall, the revised SELINK adjustments show that the productions for many zones are reduced by, a factor of 0.5 to 0.8 while the productions for ~ relatively few zones are increased by factors from 1.1 to 4 with most of the factors in the 3.0 range. No obvious explanation for the frequency distribution could be found. The revised SELINK adjustments overall appear to be reasonable. The heavy truck VMT analysis is conducted by comparing the 1990 heavy truck VMT that is forecasted by the GM truck forecasting model, 2.975 billions, with the WisDOT computed data. This gives an estimate that is 18.3% less than the WisDOT computation of 3.642 billions of VMT. The WisDOT estimates are based on the sampling the link volumes for USH, 8TH, and CTH. This implies potential error in sampling the average link volume. The WisDOT estimate of heavy truck VMT cannot be tabulated by the three trip types, I-I, I-E ('||'&'||'pound;-I), and E-E. In contrast, the GM forecasting model shows that the proportion ofE-E VMT out of total VMT is 21.24%. In addition, tabulation of heavy truck VMT by route functional class shows that the proportion of truck traffic traversing the freeways and expressways is 76.5%. Only 14.1% of total freeway truck traffic is I-I trips, while 80% of total collector truck traffic is I-I trips. This implies that freeways are traversed mainly by I-E and E-E truck traffic while collectors are used mainly by I-I truck traffic. Other tabulations such as average heavy truck speed by trip type, average travel distance by trip type and the VMT distribution by trip type, route functional class and travel speed are useful information for highway planners to understand the characteristics of statewide heavy truck trip patternS. Heavy truck volumes for the target year 2010 are forecasted by using the GM truck forecasting model. Four scenarios are used. Fo~ better forecasting, ground count- based segment adjustment factors are developed and applied. ISH 90 '||'&'||' 94 and USH 41 are used as example routes. The forecasting results by using the ground count-based segment adjustment factors are satisfactory for long range planning purposes, but additional ground counts would be useful for USH 41. Sensitivity analysis provides estimates of the impacts of the alternative growth rates including information about changes in the trip types using key routes. The network'||'&'||'not;based GMcan easily model scenarios with different rates of growth in rural versus . . urban areas, small versus large cities, and in-state zones versus external stations. cities, and in-state zones versus external stations.