• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.245-256
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 구강위생용품 사용에 미치는 영향을 조사하여 향후 이와 관련된 구강보건교육 방향의 시사점을 제공하고자 2013년 12월부터 2014년 5월까지 약 6개월 동안 서울 및 경기도에 위치한 치과의원에 내원한 환자 320명의 자료를 수집하여, 이 중 응답이 미흡한 21부를 제외한 다음 수집된 자료의 93.4%에 해당되는 299부를 분석하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 첫째, 조사대상자의 구강위생용품 관련 구강보건교육과 인지, 사용간의 상관관계는 구강위생용품 관련 구강보건교육을 받는 경우 구강위생용품 인지 정도(p<0.001)와 사용 정도(p<0.001)가 증가하는 것으로 나타났고, 구강위생용품 인지정도가 증가할수록 사용 정도도 증가하는 것으로 나타났다(p<0.001). 둘째, 구강위생용품 교육은 종속변수인 구강위생용품 인지에 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다(p<0.001). 이상의 결과에서 구강병을 예방하기 위하여 구강상태에 적합한 구강위생용품의 올바른 지식과 사용방법에 대한 교육의 기회를 넓히고, 환자에게 구강위생용품에 대한 사용동기를 부여할 수 있는 체계적이고 대중적인 구강보건교육 프로그램 개발과 시행, 홍보를 통해 구강건강 향상에 기여해야 한다고 사료된다.

• 치위생과학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.121-127
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 S보건대학에 재학 중인 치위생과와 비치위생과 재학생 287여명을 대상으로 구강건강향상을 위한 잇솔질과 구강위생보조용품의 사용 실태를 비교 분석하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 잇솔질에 관한 특성부분에서 두과 모두 잇솔질 횟수는 하루에 2-3번(p < 0.05), 사용기간은 2-5개월(p > 0.05), 잇솔질 방법은 두 과 모두 안다고 조사되었으나(p > 0.05), 잇솔모의 사용에서는 치위생과는 보통모(51.2%), 비치위생과는 부드러운모(51.5%)로 조사되었다(p > 0.05). 2. 치실고리, 고무치간자극기, 물사출기, 혀세정기에 관한 인지도, 현재사용여부에서 두 과는 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았으나(p > 0.05), 용도이해부분에서 유의한 차이를 보였다(p < 0.05). 3. 전동칫솔, 가그린에 관한 인지도, 현재사용여부에서 두 과는 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(p > 0.05).

• 치위생과학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.93-99
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 구강위생용품의 사용 실태를 알아보기 위하여 S시 D중공업의 근로자를 대상으로 가정에서 가장 관심을 가지고 관리하는 구강병, 잇솔의 사용실태, 불소치약의 사용여부, 구강위생보조용품의 사용실태, 구강위생보조용품의 사용 및 비사용의 동기를 조사 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 가정에서 가장 관심을 가지고 관리하는 구강병은 치아우식증(62.4%)으로 나타났다. 2. 칫솔 사용실태는 중간 크기를(79.6%) 가장 많이 사용하였다. 3. 잇솔의 강모 모양은 일반 수평형(73.5%)을 가장 많이 사용하였다. 4. 불소치약 사용여부는 아무 종류나 사용한다(73.5%)가 가장 많았다. 5. 구강위생용품의 인지도에 대해서는 전동잇솔이(77.0%)로 가장 높으며 구강위생보조 용품에 대한 인지도는 이쑤시개(89.4%)와 양치용액(84.5%)을 가장 많이 알고 있었다. 구강위생용품의 사용여부는 전동잇솔(13.3%), 치주환자용 잇솔(2.7%), 순서로 나타나며, 구강위생보조용품에서는 이쑤시개(58.4%), 양치용액(41.2%)의 순이었다. 사용효과는 틀니잇솔(50.0%), 전동잇솔(43.3%)로 나타났으며, 구강위생보조용 품에서 효과 여부는 물사출기(80.0%), 치실(75.8%)이 매우 높았다. 6. 구강위생보조용품을 사용하게 된 동기는 TV나 광고 홍보물을 보고 독자적인 판단으로 사용하는 경우가 (57.6%) 높게 나타났으며, 구강위생보조용품을 사용하지 않는 이유로는 자신에게 적절한 보조용품을 모르기 때문에 사용하지 못한다는 의견이 매우 높게 (57.4%)나타났다.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제20권5호
• /
• pp.603-610
• /
• 2020

Objectives: This study was aimed at investigating the oral hygiene device use by cardiovascular disease patients and assessing related factors. Methods: We used data of 1,630 cardiovascular disease patients (including hypertension, stroke, and myocardial infarction) from the 7th Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016-2018). The χ² test and logistic regression analysis were performed to analyze the oral hygiene device use by the subjects and assess related factors. All statistical analyses were performed with the IBM SPSS Statistics, version 20.0. Results: The oral hygiene device use and related factors were significantly higher in patients with an educational level of middle school or below high school, with a score of 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35-2.53), or college, with a score of 1.93 (95% CI = 1.19-3.14), compared to those with an educational level below primary school. Further, the oral hygiene device use and related factors were significantly higher in patients who answered 'yes', with a score of 1.96 (95% CI = 1.42-2.73), compared to those who answered 'no' to the question on oral examination. Conclusions: More patients with cardiovascular disease did not use oral hygiene devices than those who did. It is necessary to expand the approach of preventive treatment to increase the utilization rate of oral hygiene devices.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.951-959
• /
• 2013

Objectives : The purpose of this study was to investigate influential factors for the use of oral hygiene supplies with a view to give the right directions for related oral health education. Methods : Subjects were recruited in dental clinics in Seoul and Gyeonggi Province. Questionnaire data were carried out from June 1 to August 31, 2012. Results : 1. The awareness towards oral hygiene supplies revealed a mean of $5.46{\pm}3.87$ out of 14 points. Familiarity with the oral hygiene supplies was $2.62{\pm}2.66$ and that of oral hygiene supplies was $2.63{\pm}1.48$. 2. A regression analysis showed that by selecting the use of oral hygiene supplies as a dependent variable and the model turned out to make an 8.1% prediction. Among the selected independent variables, familiarity with the use of oral hygiene supplies revealed a statistically significant influence on the use of oral hygiene supplies that was a dependent variable(p<0.000). Conclusions : Awareness of oral hygiene supplies didn't have a lot of impact on the use of the supplies. It is important to motivate learners to make use of oral hygiene supplies in case of oral health education.

• 치위생과학회지
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.387-395
• /
• 2009

2009년 4월 20일부터 5월 10일까지 전북지역 일부 중 고등학교 학생들을 대상으로 구강위생용품의 인식 및 일반적인 사용실태와 구강보건교육 경험 등을 조사한 본 연구에서의 결론은 다음과 같다. 전동칫솔과 양치용액은 인지 및 사용경험이 높게 조사되었고, 그와 반대로 치간칫솔은 인지 및 사용경험 모두 낮게 나타났다. 또한, 구강위생용품을 사용하지 않는 이유는 '잘 몰라서' 응답이 가장 높았다. 이는 구강위생용품에 대해 알고 있어야 해당 구강위생용품을 실제로 사용할 수 있다는 것을 의미한다. 대부분의 중 고등학생들의 구강위생용품에 대한 인지도와 사용률이 낮은 것으로 나타났으며, 구강보건교육 경험은 많지 않았고 구강보건교육에 대한 요구는 높은 것으로 조사되었다. 그러므로 학교 구강보건교육 시행을 위한 교육프로그램 개발과 시행이 무엇보다 중요하다고 할 수 있다. 이러한 결과는 중 고등학교 학생들의 구강위생용품의 사용 및 구강보건교육에 대한 실태를 파악하므로써 적절한 구강위생용품 사용을 권장하는 방안을 제시하고, 이를 바탕으로 학교 구강보건교육 프로그램 개발과 학교구강보건 증진을 위한 기초자료로 활용하는데 도움이 될 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.580-592
• /
• 2009

Objectives : This study had been performed for Respondents who live in Daegu and Kyungbuk province Age group of 30 to 50 years old. Methods : The oral health state and oral heath care, dental treatments about the use of oral hygiene devices were obtained through self-administering questionnaires from 2 to 31, January, 2009. Results : 1. The toothpick was well known for respondents and automatic brush, gargle, dental floss were practically used. 2. 57.1% of man know oral hygiene device, they know more about oral hygiene device if they have higher degree, and they use more if they are older than others. 3. 55.5% of respondents who think their oral health condition is not healthy enough recognize oral hygiene device, 77.5% of respondents who visited dental clinic around six month recognize oral hygiene device. 82.4% of respondents who had been follow-up. 86.1% of respondents who think their oral health state is good enough doesn't use oral hygiene device, oral hygiene device was used more for respondents who visited dental clinic frequently. 47.1% of respondents who visited dental clinic periodically use oral hygiene device. 4. Respondents who experience implant recognize more about oral hygiene device and periodontal Tx, orthodontics problem, preservative treatment were next. 5. 60.0% of respondents who were educated tooth brushing method recognize it. Oral hygiene device was frequently used if tooth brushing time were increased. 26.4% of respondents who were changed their tooth brushing method used oral hygiene device. Conclusions : Their recognition level was practically low whose age is around 30 to 50. Their oral hygiene device use ratio is higher then others who were educated tooth brush method so that I think we need to recommend for use oral hygiene device and use method.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.399-407
• /
• 2012

Objectives : Purpose of this research is to determined the general knowledge on oral health and the usage of oral hygiene products in the orthodontic patients and try to provide an appropriate oral hygiene products for the patients. Methods : Orthodontic patients who visited a dental clinic in Daejeon were selected and data from 352 patients were collected. Questionnaire based on survey was conducted from 1st of March to 30th in 2011 and all the data was analysed by using SPSS statistical program (VER 15.0). Frequency analysis, $x^2$ test, T-test and the amount of diurnal variance analysis (one-way ANOVA) were also used. After that, scheffe's post-test method was conducted. Results : According to the general characteristics of oral health care knowledge score was $2.87{\pm}0.60$, the attitude score was $2.96{\pm}0.57$. toothbrush replacement cycle were less than 3 months (p=0.007, p=0.000) and frequency of brushing one day more than three times higher in patients with knowledge to help attitude. according to the sex, age, and duration of orthodontic treatment with oral hygiene devices of usage was higher in the calibration toothbrush usage, awareness was higher in the interdental toothbrushes. according to the type of orthodontic devices from the oral hygiene devices usage, removable group was the orthodontic toothbrush and electric toothbrush group were highest in the 'unknown', the fixed group was orthodontic toothbrush(67.3%) and electric toothbrushes(40.8%) was higher in the usage. Patients who used oral hygiene devices such as orthodontic tooth brush, interdental brush, electric toothbrush, water pik and fern solution showed wider knowledge on oral health care and oral hygiene devices compared to patients who answered as does not aware of oral hygiene devices and never used these products before. Conclusions : Orthodontic patient's oral health attitudes, knowledge, and oral hygiene devices usage are the general characteristics of the highest in the orthodontic toothbrush usage, awareness was higher in the interdental brush. Water pik and fern solution, rubber and gingival interdental stimulator turned massage does not use or low. Based on results from research, overall orthodontic patients who visited a dental clinic had low awareness and usage of oral hygiene devices. Therefore, it is required to educate general publics and the orthodontic patients and also promote the importance of usage of oral hygiene devices.

• 치위생과학회지
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.247-253
• /
• 2015

치과진료실은 주사바늘 찔림 사고가 빈번하게 일어나고 있으며 그로 인한 혈액매개성 질환에 노출 위험이 높은 곳이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 조사한 자료들을 토대로 주사바늘 찔림 사고 예방 감염관리지침(안)을 제안하였다. 치과진료실에서의 치과 보건 의료인들에게 실질적인 예방대책으로 사료되나 주사바늘 찔림 사고 예방 안전 기구와 장비의 도입 및 사용법 숙지가 필요하다.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.181-191
• /
• 2017

Objectives: The objective of the study was to investigate the use of dental hygiene devices in Korean adolescents. Methods: The study subjects were 70,362 adolescents in 800 schools who completed the 2015 Korean Youth Risk Behavior Web-based survey. Dependent variables included usage of dental floss, interdental brushes and mouthwash solutions. Independent variables included demographic characteristics of the subjects, health state and behaviors, and oral health behaviors and experience of oral diseases. Results: The related factors of usage of dental hygiene devices included gender, where females showed higher usage (OR=1.10) compared to males, father and mother's level of education where usage was higher in above university graduates (OR=1.20, OR=1.14) compared to less than high school graduation, economic status where usage was higherin high and middle (OR=1.93, OR=1.26) compared to low, vigorous physical activity where usage was higher in those who responded yes (OR=1.35) compared to no, subjective weight recognition where usage was higher in normal (OR=1.07) compared to under weight, sleep time where usage was higher in enough (OR=1.12) compared to not enough, number of toothbrushing (day) where usage was higher in 2 times or over 3 times (OR=1.35, OR=1.75) compared to below 1, oral health education experience (OR=1.10), sealant experience (OR=1.17) and scaling experience (OR=1.45) where usage was higher in those who responded yes compared to no, school where usage was lower in high school (OR=0.64) compared to middle school, residential type where usage was lower in rural area (OR=0.74) compared to metropolitan area, living form where usage was lower in other (OR=0.77), compared to with family, smoking (OR=0.93), and alcohol drinking (OR=0.90) where usage was lower in those who engage in the activities compared to those who didn't, BMI where usage was lower in normal (OR=0.87) and over weight (OR=0.98) compared to under weight. Conclusions: To expand the use of dental hygiene devices in the adolescents, it is necessary to improve the continuing education program for need and motivation of dental hygiene device usage.