• 제목/요약/키워드: top base foundations

검색결과 6건 처리시간 0.024초

연약지반상 팽이기초 적용에 따른 지지특성 (The Bearing Capacity of Top Base Foundations in Soft Ground)

  • 김찬국;김학문
    • 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국지반공학회 2010년도 춘계 학술발표회
    • /
    • pp.401-414
    • /
    • 2010
  • Top Base Foundation(TBF) is a stabilization method for light weight structures particularly in the soft ground. It is widely used for the increment of bearing capacity and restraining settlement of foundations when the bearing capacity of ground is not enough. However, when the design values from exiting Japanese standard are compared with the observation values from the field measurement, the bearing capacity of exiting standard estimated smaller For this reason, it is necessary to establish more reasonable prediction technique considering to understand the behavior of TBF in soft ground. In this study, 1/5 scale model tests were performed in the laboratory. Also, full scale tests were carried out in order to investigate the behavior of TBF with various shapes. In addition, about 100 sites measurement data were evaluated to investigate the behavior of TBF in various ground conditions. Based on the results of the model tests and field measurement data, it was possible to establish more reasonable the bearing capacity equation of TBF considering various N-value of soil, the effect of underground water and failure shapes.

  • PDF

비점착성 지반상 팽이기초 적용에 따른 지지특성 (The Bearing Capacity Characteristics of Top Base Foundations in Cohesionless Soils)

  • 김찬국;김학문
    • 한국지반공학회논문집
    • /
    • 제26권7호
    • /
    • pp.135-145
    • /
    • 2010
  • 최근까지 국내에서는 팽이기초에 관한 연구가 미흡하였고, 지반조건에 맞는 설계기준이 마련되어 있지 못하여 일본의 설계기준을 그대로 사용하고 있는 실정이다. 이로 인해 기존 팽이기초의 지지력식은 과소하게 예측되는 문제점이 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 실제크기의 1/5 스케일로 축소한 모형실험을 수행하였으며, 국내에서 이루어 진 100여개 현장의 재하실험 결과를 근거로 강도특성(N값), 지하수영향, 팽이기초의 파괴형상을 고려하여 보다 합리적으로 팽이기초의 지지력을 예측할 수 있는 식을 제안하였다.

팽이기초공법(Top-Base Method)의 하중-침하량 분석 (Load-Settlement Characteristics of Concrete TOP-BASE Foundation on Soft Ground)

  • 김재영;정상섬;이재환
    • 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국지반공학회 2009년도 춘계 학술발표회
    • /
    • pp.210-221
    • /
    • 2009
  • A new foundation type which is called Top-Base method has been used frequently in engineering practices in Korea. In this study, the settlement behavior of concrete Top-Base foundation on soft ground is investigated since the consolidation settlement of the embedding depth and the effect of footing dimensions are not included in current Korean criterion (2007). To obtain detailed information, the model tests of the Top-Base foundation are performed using the PLAXIS 3D finite element analysis. It is shown that in-situ measurements and finite element analysis of the behavior of foundations indicate that consolidation settlement is reduced up and bearing capacity of the foundation increases up to 50%~100%, compared to the primary non-treated ground. Based on this study, it is found that the Top-Base foundation prevents the lateral deformation of soft ground and reduces its negative dilatancy to the surface settlement, and that the foundation creates rather uniform stress distribution under it to increase its bearing capacity. It is also found that the total settlement of Top-Base foundation was highly dependent on the consolidation settlement and footing configurations.

  • PDF

매립지반의 팽이말뚝 평판재하시험 사례 연구 (Case Study Top-Base Foundation Static Loading Test in Reclaimed Land)

  • 신은철;김성환;이애영
    • 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국지반공학회 2008년도 추계 학술발표회
    • /
    • pp.721-728
    • /
    • 2008
  • Top-Base Method is a stabilization method for light weight structures particularly in the soft ground. It is widely used for the increment of bearing capacity and the effect of restraining settlement when the bearing capacity of the ground is not enough. Top-shaped cone concrete foundations are installed in graveled laid over soft ground. The principle of the basic method is to maximize effect of dispersing the overburden pressure by increasing the contact area of the top-shaped cone. Therefore, the bearing capacity is increased and the settlement is decreased by the embedded resistance of pile part in the ground. In this paper, the plate bearing test was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of Top-Base foundation. Based on the test results, the coefficient of subgrade reaction, elastic modulus, and settlement of foundation on reclaimed land was derived.

  • PDF

모형토조실험을 통한 현장타설 팽이기초의 거동특성 연구 (Evaluation of In-situ Top Base Foundation Behavior using Calibration Chamber Test)

  • 김학문;김찬국
    • 한국산학기술학회논문지
    • /
    • 제7권4호
    • /
    • pp.697-703
    • /
    • 2006
  • 본 논문에서는 국내. 외에서 처음으로 시도되는 현장타설 팽이기초공법의 거동특성을 검토하기 위하여 기초형식을 현장타설 팽이기초(In-Situ TBF), 공장제작 콘크리트 팽이기초(PC-TBF) 전면기초, 무처리 원지반으로 나누어 모형토조실험을 수행하였다. 모형실험결과 현장타설 팽이기초와 공장제작 콘크리트 팽이기초의 거동특성은 거의 유사하게 나타났으며, 이들 팽이기초는 원지반 및 전면기초에 비하여 지지력 증대효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 기초 형식에 따른 지중연직응력 분포를 검토한 결과 팽이기초 설치시 지중연직응력의 영향범위가 감소하는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 한편, 지반이 조밀할수록 팽이기초의 응력분산효과가 감소하는 것을 알 수 있었으며, 향후 다양한 지반조건에서 모형실험과 수치해석을 통해 보다 많은 검토가 수행되어야 할 것으로 판단된다.

  • PDF

연극에 대한 문화연구적 접근 -'이론' 도입의 한계를 중심으로- (The Approaches of Cultural Studies to Theatre -The Limits of Theory Application-)

  • 김용수
    • 한국연극학
    • /
    • 제40호
    • /
    • pp.307-344
    • /
    • 2010
  • Cultural Studies built on the critical mind of New Left exposes the relationship between culture and power, and investigates how this relationship develops the cultural convention. It has achieved the new perspective that could make us to think culture and art in terms of political correctness. However, the critical voices against the theoretical premises of Cultural Studies have been increased as its heyday in 1980s was nearly over. For instance, Terry Eagleton, a former Marxist literary critic, declared in 2003 that the golden age of cultural theory is long past. This essay, therefore, intends to show the weak foundations on which the approaches of cultural studies to theatre rest and to clarify the general problem of their introduction to theatre studies. The approach of cultural studies to theatre takes the form of 'top-down inquiry' as it applies a theory to a particular play or historical period. In other word, from the theory the writer moves to the particular case. The result is not an inquiry but rather a demonstration. This circularity can destroy the point of serious intellectual investigation as the theory dictates answers. The goal-oriented narrow viewpoint as a logical consequence of 'top-down inquiry' makes the researcher to favor the plays or the parts of a play that are proper to test a theory. As a result it loses the fair judgment on the artistic value of a play, and brings about the misinterpretation. The interpreter-oriented reading is the other defect of cultural studies as it disregards the inherent meaning of the text, distorting a play. The approach of cultural studies also consists of a conventionality as it arrives at a stereotyped interpretation by using certain conventions of reasoning and rhetoric. The cultural theories are fundamentally the 'outside theories' that seek to explain not theatre but the very broad features of society and politics. Consequently their application to theatre risks the destructive criticism, disregarding the inherent experience of theatre. Most of, if not all, cultural theories, furthermore, are proven to be lack of empirical basis. The alternative method to them is a 'cognitive science' that proves scientifically our mind being influenced by bodily experience. The application of cultural materialism to Shakespeare's is one of the cases that reveal the limits of cultural studies. Jonathan Dollimore and Water Cohen provide a kind of 'canonical study' in this application that is imitated by the succeeding researchers. As a result the interpretation of has been flooded with repetitive critical remarks, revealing the problem of 'top-down inquiry' and conventional reasoning. Cultural Studies is antipodal to theatre in some respect. It is interested chiefly in the social and political reality while theatre aims to create the fiction world. The theatre studies, therefore, may have to risk the danger of destroying its own base when it adopts cultural studies uncritically. The different stance between theatre and cultural theories also occurs from the opposition of humanism vs. antihumanism. We have to introduce cultural theories selectively and properly not to destroy the inherent experience and domain of theatre.