• Title/Summary/Keyword: tier 3 method

Search Result 80, Processing Time 0.031 seconds

Design and Implementation of Multilingual support method for 3-tiered softwares (3-TIER 구조 소프트웨어의 다국어 지원 방식의 설계와 구현)

  • Koh, Jeong-Gook
    • Journal of Korea Multimedia Society
    • /
    • v.15 no.2
    • /
    • pp.266-272
    • /
    • 2012
  • Multilingual support of software is necessary for entering global market. 3-tier architecture is a solution for problems of 2-tier architecture. It divides an application into a client-tier and an application-tier, and presentation logic and database are connected by middleware. The advantage of 3-tier architecture is the enhanced performance through load balancing, scalability, easier maintenance and reusability. This paper proposes a multilingual support method that utilizes common resource files for 3-tier enterprise softwares, applies the proposed method to development of multilingual version of billing solution, and verify the usefulness of it. It is easy for development and maintenance of software, the addition of language supported. Proposed method holds a resource file for each language and provides a multilingual support class library. Therefore this method reduces a waste of memory and disk space. Deployment of a class library into an application tier makes development and maintenance of software, the addition of new language supported easy. To avoid inappropriate modification of a resource file, a multilingual support class library is provided in a dll file.

Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Road Transportation of Local Government by Calculation Methods (배출량 산정방법에 따른 지자체 도로수송부문의 온실가스 배출량 산정 비교)

  • Kim, Ki-Dong;Ko, Hyun-Ki;Lee, Tae-Jung;Kim, Dong-Sool
    • Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment
    • /
    • v.27 no.4
    • /
    • pp.405-415
    • /
    • 2011
  • The objective of this study was to compare greenhouse gas emissions from road transportation by calculation methods (Tier 1, Teir 2, and Tier 3). Tier 1 based on 2006 IPCC guidelines default emission factor and amount of fuel consumption. The Tier 2 approach is the same as Tier 1 except that country-specific carbon contents of the fuel sold in road transport are used. Tier 2 based on emission factor of guidelines for local government greenhouse gas inventories (Korea Environment Corporation), the fuel consumption per one vehicle, and the registered motor vehicles. The Tier 3 approach requires detailed, country-specific data to generate activity-based emission factors for vehicle subcategories (National Institute of Environmental Research) and may involve national models. Tier 3 calculates emissions by multiplying emission factors by vehicle activity levels (e.g., VKT) for each vehicle subcategory and possible road type. VKT was estimated by using GIS road map and traffic volume of the section. The GHG average emission rate by the Tier 1 was 728,857 $tonCO_2eq$/yr, while Tier 2 and Tier 3 were 864,757 $tonCO_2eq$/yr and 661,710 $tonCO_2eq$/yr, respectively. Tier 3 was underestimated by 10.1 and 20.7 percent for the GHG emission observed by Tier 1 and Tier 2, respectively. Based on this study, we conclude that Tier 2 is reasonable GHG emissions than Tier 1 or Tier 3. But, further study is still needed to accurate GHG emission from Tier 3 method by expanding the traffic survey area and developing the model of local road traffic.

A Study on the Calculation of GHG Emissions from General Ships by Tier3 Method (일반선박의 Tier3 수준의 온실가스 배출량 산정에 관한 연구)

  • Bong, Choon-Keun;Park, Seong-Jin;Kim, Yong-Gu;Lee, Im-Hack;Lee, Hee-Kwan;Hwang, Ui-Hyun
    • Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers
    • /
    • v.33 no.10
    • /
    • pp.701-708
    • /
    • 2011
  • In this study, the emissions of GHG from general ships were calculated by Tier1 method based on the fuel consumption, and by Tier3 method based on the activities data such as power and SFOC of each engine, sailing characteristics (e.g. time and load factor, etc.) considering the ship type. In 2009, the emissions of GHG by Tier1 and Tier3 method were appeared 28.27 mega-ton $CO_{2eq}$ and 30.81 mega-ton $CO_{2eq}$. The emissions by Tier3 were slightly more than those by Tier1. We found that the values of the sailing characteristics for surveyed data are overestimated slightly. In the near future, more detailed researches for sailing characteristics considering ship types would be needed for sailing, anchoring, and berthing condition, etc.

Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emission from Construction Equipment by Tier 2 and Tier 3 Methodologies (건설기계의 Tier 2와 Tier 3 방법론에 의한 온실가스 배출량 비교)

  • Shin, Yong Il;Kim, Jeong;Kim, Pil Su;Chung, Chan Kyo;Jang, Young Kee
    • Journal of Climate Change Research
    • /
    • v.1 no.1
    • /
    • pp.13-20
    • /
    • 2010
  • Recently, the operation of construction equipments have increased by many construction project. So a respectable amount of greenhouse gas is expected from construction equipments. But the greenhouse gas emissions from construction equipment have been high uncertainty due investigation of a lack of activity data and emission factors in Korea. In this study, annual greenhouse gas emissions from construction equipment are estimated by IPCC's Tier 2 and Tier 3 method. These methods require emission factors, fuel consumption, average kilowatts and operating hours. As the results, the nationwide emission from construction equipments by Tier 2 and Tier 3 are calculated as $21,784kton-CO_2eq/year$ and $22,811kton-CO_2eq/year$ in 2008.

Reduction Effect of CO2 Emission on BIS Using Tier 3 Methodology - A Case Study on Daejun-Chungjoo Project - (Tier 3 방법론을 활용한 BIS 사업의 CO2 저감효과 분석 - 대전-청주 간 광역BIS 사업을 중심으로 -)

  • Chung, Younshik;Song, Taijin;Kim, Jeongwan
    • KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.31 no.3D
    • /
    • pp.375-381
    • /
    • 2011
  • This study presents an analysis of $CO_2$ emission reduction effect on bus information system (BIS) which is operated to improve various services of bus transit such as rapid and on-time service. Although the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released three methodological types of models for analyzing the amount of greenhouse gas reduction, this study used the Tier 3 method that is the most concrete one. A case study was performed to a 8.3 km section of Daejun-Chungjoo BIS system, and dataset required to the Tier 3 method was obtained from ITS-based surveillance systems. The study result showed that the reduction effect of $CO_2$ on BIS operation was yearly $39.45tCO_2/km$. Therefore, such effect can be potentially useful to a measurement of effectiveness (MOE) of BIS projects hereafter.

Quality Improvement of Greenhouse Gas Inventories by the Use of Bottom-Up Data (상향식 자료를 이용한 온실가스 인벤토리의 품질 개선 방향 - 화학, 금속 분야를 중심으로 -)

  • Choi, Eunhwa;Shin, Eunseop;Yi, Seung-Muk
    • Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment
    • /
    • v.30 no.2
    • /
    • pp.161-174
    • /
    • 2014
  • The methodology report '2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories' shows higher tier method can be a good practice, which uses country-specific or plant-specific data when calculating greenhouse gas emissions by country. We review the methodology report to present principles of using plant-level data and also examine examples of using plant-level data in chemical and metal industry in 20 countries for the purpose of quality improvement of national greenhouse gas inventories. We propose that Korea consider utilizing plant-level data, as reported according to 'Greenhouse gas and Energy Target Management Scheme', in the following order as a preference. First, the data can be utilized for quality control of Korea's own parameters, when Tier 2 method is adopted and bottom-up approach is not applicable. Second, both plant-level data and IPCC default data can be used together, combining Tier 1 method with Tier 3 method. Third, we can also use acquired plant-level data and country specific parameters, combining Tier 2 method with Tier 3 method. Fourth, if the plant-level data involves all categories of emissions and the data is proven to be representative, we can apply Tier 3 method. In this case, we still need to examine the data to check its reliability by a consistent framework, including appropriate quality control.

A Study on the Calculation Model for Tier 3 Greenhouse Gas(GHG) Emission Factors of Diesel Locomotives (디젤기관차 Tier 3 온실가스 배출계수 산정 모델 연구)

  • Rhee, Young-Ho;Kim, Yong-Ki;Lee, Jae-Young;Jung, Woo-Sung
    • Proceedings of the KSR Conference
    • /
    • 2011.10a
    • /
    • pp.1315-1319
    • /
    • 2011
  • As government's policy is enacted to reduce greenhouse gas emission in transportation sector, railroad sector has to estimate amount of emission and propose feasible methods to reduce emission. To calculate accurate emission of railroad sector, we performed a study on the calculation model development for Tier 3 GHG emission factors. According to IPCC guide line, Tier 3 emission factor reflects individual characteristic of diesel locomotive. For this reason, we estimated GHG emission factor by stratified diesel locomotive and the result show difference of emission factor by notch changing. Therefore, the analysis of notch frequency during operation is required to develop Tier 3 emission factor, and we analysed a running pattern of diesel locomotive. As a result, idle and 8 notch consist about 70% of total running distance. In conclusion, the calculation model suppose that Tier 3 GHG emission factor is the sum of multiplied emission factor by weights in each notch. This result can contribute to Tier 3 emission factor calculation and reduction method development of emission in railroad sector by managing driving efficiency and technology development.

  • PDF

A Comparative Study for Estimation of Greenhouse Gas for Local Government`s Sustainable Transport (지속가능교통 평가를 위한 온실가스 배출량 산정 방법론의 지자체 적용 및 비교 연구)

  • Yu, Byeong-Yong;Bae, Sang-Hun;Han, Sang-Yong;Kim, Geon-Yeong
    • Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
    • /
    • v.29 no.5
    • /
    • pp.55-65
    • /
    • 2011
  • In effort to estimate sustainability of the transportation sector, this study conducts a comparative analysis of methodology suggested for measuring greenhouse gas emission. There are two approaches proposed by the UN IPCC: 1) top-down approach (TDA) based on the amount oil sales, and 2) bottom-up approach (BUA) utilizing the velocity of moving source and traffic volume data. The subject areas for analysis were selected based on research results by the Korea Transportation Institute that evaluate traffic sustainability of each local government. Gwacheon-si being one of the top ranked areas in sustainability, and Anseong-si being ranked at the 7th level were analyzed. By the tier 1 methodology, Gwacheon-si and Anseong-si are estimated to create 74,813ton/yr, and 584,125ton/yr of the greenhouse gas emission, respectively. The tier 3 methodology, however, estimates Gwacheon-si and Anseong-si to create 91,462ton/yr, and 163,801ton/yr of the emission, respectively. Comparison of the two estimated emissions shows considerable differences; i.e., the tier 3 method over estimates Gwacheon-si's emission by 22.3% whereas it underestimates Anseong-si's greenhouse gas emission by the factor of about 3.5 compared to the emissions obtained from the tier 1 method. The result from this study implies that the traffic-sustainability-index based grade of each local government can be evaluated differently by the method adopted for measuring greenhouse gas emission.

Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Road Transportation in Local Cities/Counties of Gyeonggi Province by Calculation Methodologies (도로수송부문의 온실가스 배출량 산정방법에 따른 경기도 시·군별 배출량 비교)

  • Lee, Tae-Jung;Kim, Ki-Dong;Jung, Won-Seok;Kim, Dong-Sool
    • Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment
    • /
    • v.28 no.4
    • /
    • pp.454-465
    • /
    • 2012
  • The Korean government decided to reduce 30% of GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions BAU in 2020. Since many efforts to reduce emissions are urgently needed in Korea, the central administrative organization urges local governments to establish their own reduction schemes. Among many GHG emission categories, the emission from mobile source in Gyeonggi Province accounted for 25.3% of total emissions in 2007 and further the emission from road transport sector occupied the most dominant portion in this transportation category. The objective of this study was to compare 3 types of GHG emissions from road transport sector in 31 local cities/counties of Gyeonggi Province, which have been estimated by Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 methodologies. As results, the GHG emission rates by the Tier 1 and Tier 2 were $19,991kt-CO_2\;Eq/yr$ and $18,511kt-CO_2\;Eq/yr$, respectively. On the other hand, the emission rate by Tier 3 excluding a branch road emission portion was $18,051kt-CO_2\;Eq/yr$. In addition, the total emission rate including all the main and branch road portions in Gyeonggi Province was $24,152kt-CO_2\;Eq/yr$, which was estimated by a new Tier 3 methodology. Based on this study, we could conclude that Tier 3 is a reasonable methodology than Tier 1 or Tier 2. However, more accurate and less uncertain methodology must be developed by expanding traffic survey areas and adopting a suitable model for traffic volumes.

Estimation of Greenhouse Gas Emission from Motorcycles in 2008 (이륜차의 온실가스 배출량 추정(2008))

  • Shin, Yong Il;Kim, Jeong;Kim, Pil Su;Jang, Young Kee
    • Journal of Climate Change Research
    • /
    • v.1 no.1
    • /
    • pp.51-57
    • /
    • 2010
  • Recently the number of motorcycles has increased in urban area, and it is believed that motorcycle is one of the air pollution and greenhouse gas emission sources. But the greenhouse gas emission from motorcycle has been high uncertainty due investigation of a lack of activity data and emission factors in Korea. So in this study, the greenhouse gas emission from motorcycle is estimated by considering the population of moped and VKT(vehicle kilometers travelled) of motorcycle by recent other studies. And the emissions by IPCC Tier 2 and Tier 3 methodology are calculated and compared. As the results, the nationwide $CO_2$ equivalent emissions from motorcycles by Tier 2 and Tier 3 method are calculated as 2,758 kton/yr and 2,739 kton/yr in 2008. The contribution ratio of this emission is estimated as 2.7% in on-road transport sector.