• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.175-201
• /
• 2007

Licensing contracts between partners in International Joint Ventures(IJV) have not only aspects of relation contract, which is interdependent and long-term cooperative relationships in interpartner but also aspects of discrete contract which is exposed to opportunistic risk caused by IJV partners who maximize individual profit instead of joint payoff maximization. In this circumstance, appropriate compensation structures such as lump-sum and royalty can reduce conflicts and spur interpartner cooperation. In addition, compensation structures that stipulate each party's rights, duties, and responsibilities under various sets of environmental conditions have strong implications for transaction cost minimization and joint payoff maximization. On the other hands, compensation structures such as lump-sum and royalty in IJV licensing contract have benefits and costs depending on IJV partners uncertainty, partner dependency, and environment uncertainty. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to empirically show how partner uncertainty, partner dependence and environment uncertainty influence compensation structure chosen by licensor in IJV.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• v.47 no.3
• /
• pp.260-266
• /
• 2015

Twenty sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFRs) have provided valuable experience in design, licensing, and operation. This paper summarizes the important safety criteria and safety guidelines of intermediate sodium systems, steam generators, decay heat removal systems and associated construction materials and in-service inspection. The safety criteria and guidelines provide a sufficient framework for design and licensing, in particular by new entrants in SFRs.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.476-509
• /
• 2008

This research investigates the determinant factors of technology licensing contracts and the relative importance of each factor. To accomplish this objective we classify various factors affecting technology licenses into two categories, technology and environment, and conduct an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with a Korean expert survey. From the AHP results, we find that the possibility of commercial success, as well as the scope and levels of exclusive rights which are transferred together with technology to the licensee, are very important among technological factors in technology transfer. Moreover, we conclude that the technology utilization capacity and the learning capabilities of the licensee are also important environmental factors. Finally, we conclude that the factors which the licensor and licensee consider in technology transfer are different from each other. Based on this result, we discuss implications with regard to reducing this factor gap between the licensor and licensee as a means of promoting and improving technology transfer in the Republic of Korea.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.16 no.8
• /
• pp.129-136
• /
• 2018

This study analyzed technology application field and technology transfer type related to the 4th industrial revolution using frequency, visualization, and association analysis of text mining of Big Data. The analysis was conducted between the last three years (2015 - 2017) registered with the NTB of KIAT transfer technology database was utilized. As a result of analysis, First, First, transfer technologies called core technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution are a lot of about robots, 3D, autonomous driving, and wearables. Second, as the year go by, transfer technolgy registration such as IoT, Cloud, VR is increasing. Third, the results of the association analysis of technology transfer type are as follows. IoT and VR showed preference for technology trading and licensing, autonomous driving technology trading, wearable licensing, robots preferring technology cooperation, licensing, and technology trading.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
• /
• v.29 no.6
• /
• pp.628-638
• /
• 2023

Maritime Autonomous Surface ships(MASS) are gradually gaining importance. Until fully autonomous ships are developed, they will likely be controlled by remote operators who are based in a Remote Operations Center. However, there is currently no internationally or domestically established licensing for them. This issue can potentially pose a risk to navigation safety due to operations being handled by unqualified remote operators. We conducted a literature review and proposed criteria for the adoption of a licensing system for remote operators. We have futher offered alternatives to integrate this license into the existing officer licensing system, and analyzed them using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Subsequently,, theprimary need to enact legislation for remote operators is observed. The most preferred approach is to include the occupation of a remote operator in the Ship Officer Act, Article 4: Occupational Categories and Class of Licenses. Therefore, it would be logical for the organizational structure of the Remote Operation Center to mirror the traditional Bridge Resource Management. This study will contribute to the efficient training of remote operators and the safe navigation of autonomous ships with a focus on human resource management.

• Journal of Industrial Convergence
• /
• v.20 no.12
• /
• pp.227-233
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this research is to grasp the purpose of patent applications by companies. Based on this, we grasped the purpose of the patent application through consideration of previous research, selected 10 factors through expert Delphi, and conducted a questionnaire survey on these factors among practitioners in charge of patents in Chinese companies. Analysis results, Improve the technological image of your company, For use in negotiation: cross licensing, joint venture, Improve the situation in R&D cooperations, Enhance Reputation, Measure performance, Aacquire venture capital, Prevent patent infringement suits, Licensing Revenue, competitors' patenting and application activities, prevent copying or protect own technology from imitation. We hope that the results of this research will be useful as practical guidelines for understanding and applying factors that companies should prioritize when filing patent applications.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2010.05a
• /
• pp.105-123
• /
• 2010

• Food Science and Industry
• /
• v.40 no.3
• /
• pp.2-9
• /
• 2007

• Food Science and Industry
• /
• v.42 no.4
• /
• pp.45-50
• /
• 2009

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.1-22
• /
• 2008

The Korean government has tried to increase the total national R&D investment and, to streamline acts and regulations concerning national R&D activities. Korea's total R&D expenditure in the field of S&T for the year 2006 amounted to about 27.3 trillion won including government R&D of 8.9trillion won. The Korean government enacted several pieces of legislation concerning S&T: the "Technology Transfer Promotion Act (1999)" ; the "Framework Act on Science and Technology (2000)", and the "Presidential Regulation for Managing the Government R&D Programs (2001)." With these efforts the capacity of Korea S&T has made great strides recently. But for years Korea has run a severe deficit of technology trade. The Korea's balance ratio of technology trade is 0.36 (export/import). It means that Korean industry excessively depends on foreign resource in introducing new technologies. The Korean government has put a lot of effort into promoting the commercialization of technologies developed in universities. The public technology transfer policy of the government has improved the infrastructure of technology transfer and commercialization. However, the government has realized that these policies have not been as effective as they were anticipated. In spite of these various efforts, the technologies obtained from the government R&D Programs have not been transferred to the Korean industry properly. Only 13.6% of technologies developed in universities for the year 2005 were transferred to industry. The academic royalty revenues for the year was 0.15% of their total R&D expenditure It shows only a twentieth of the percentage of royalty revenues for the American universities. The reasons of poor commercialization of academic technologies are intermingled with imperfection of technology transfer system, lack of licensing experience, immaturity of socio-economic circumstance and inadequacy of legal system and government policy. In this study we analyzed the problems of legal system and policy in licensing of government R&D outputs and suggested proper alternatives.