• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.32-48
• /
• 2001

Many Korean companies have grown up through technology import, learning, development, innovation and export. This process is called as "the dynamic development process of technology". Among many companies which have grown up by way of this process, the Hyundai Motor Company has shown a very remarkable achievement in technological growth. In short, this paper deals with the growth of Korean companies in the view of the dynamic development process of technology. As a case study, the paper analyzes the Hyundai Motor Company.r Company.

• Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Conference
• /
• 2005.05a
• /
• pp.43-44
• /
• 2005

• IE interfaces
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.309-318
• /
• 2012

Forecasting probability or likelihood of technology development success has been a crucial factor for critical decisions in technology management such as R&D project selection and go or no-go decision of new product development (NPD) projects. This paper proposes an analytic network process (ANP) approach to forecasting of technology development success. Reviewing literature on factors affecting technology development success has constructed the ANP model composed of four criteria clusters : R&D characteristics, R&D competency, technological characteristics, and technological environment. An alternative cluster comprised of two elements, success and failure is also included in the model. The working of the proposed approach is provided with the help of a case study example of MRAM (magnetic random access memory) technology.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2010

To achieve the "low carbon green growth" vision, the first step is securing core technologies. Therefore, S&T policy direction for green technology development is urgently needed. As of 2008, investment in green technology (GT) development hovered around 10% of the government's total R&D budget. Thus, the Korean government developed a plan to increase that percentage to 15%, by 2013. To develop reasonable investment strategies for green technology development, targeted strategies that reflect technology and market changes by green technology area are needed. However, the overall planning and coordination of national GT development is currently split among, approximately, 10 government ministries. To establish an efficient green technology development system, the so-called "Green Technology R&D Council" should be launched in collaboration with the Presidential Committee on Green Growth and the National Science and Technology Council. Furthermore, to build a solid foundation for commercializing the outcomes of GT development projects and promote GT transfer, the government should undertake two initiatives. First, the government should reinforce GT R&D performance management, by establishing a GT R&D performance management and evaluation system. Second, the government should implement the "customized packaged support for promoting green technology business rights and commercialization" and present "e-marketplace for market-oriented green technologies". Creating a pan-ministerial policy for GT development policy would necessitate restructuring the HR(Human Resources) development system, which is currently separated by technology area. Based upon mid/long-term HR supply and demand forecasts, the government should design differentiated HR development projects, continuously evaluate those projects, and reflect the evaluation results in future policy development. Finally, to create new GT-related industries, the "Green TCS (Testing, Certification, and Standards) System" needs to be implemented. For objective evaluation and diffusion of R&D results by green technology area, a common standardization plan for testing, analysis, and measurement, like the "Green TCS", should be developed and integrated.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Plant Pathology Conference
• /
• 2005.04a
• /
• pp.87.2-88
• /
• 2005

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.5 no.3
• /
• pp.260-276
• /
• 2002

Technology Analysis is advanced by the development of the analysis of technological information such as technological bibliometric analysis and patent analysis. Also, the advance of technology analysis has led the development of the family of techno-market analysis such as cost-benefit analysis, analysis for new item development, and the valuation of technology and technology business. Technology analysis mostly based on technological information analysis is confronted by new challenges from the development of information science and technology such as text mining.

• Proceedings of the KSR Conference
• /
• 2011.10a
• /
• pp.472-476
• /
• 2011

Railway R&D technology development projects for the economic value of technology development does not mention the estimated economic impact on future policies must reflect the issues that are raised. In the research phase of technology development by providing value and economic effects can increase the utilization of technology development are considered. However, some items in some way to analyze and quantify its effect on what the procedures are not standardized, not as needed by individual researchers and analysis by providing a variety of reliability problems can occur. Therefore, the development of technologies to measure the value and economic impact analysis and the development of a standardized manual is needed. In this paper, development of railway technology R & D performance (technical, economic) to be estimated by an objective analysis of standardized and that man should aim to create. And the standard manual of the national economic effect in the development of technologies (production inducement effect, the effect of import substitution industries, including analysis using the taxable year), due to technology development and economic benefits (investment in railways in the handbook and the feasibility of the proposed railway project to produce various ally standards), technology development, and on which to base the valuation will.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology
• /
• v.27 no.3
• /
• pp.387-394
• /
• 2024

This paper describes a progressive test and evaluation strategy for verification of Korean Fighter eXperimental (KF-X) AESA(Active Electronically Scanned Array) radar development. Three progressive stages of development test and evaluation were officially performed from simulated test conditions to actual operating conditions according to standards: radar function/performance and avionics integration. KF-X AESA radar development is repeatedly verified by progressive stages consisting of five tests: Roof-lab ground test, System Integration Laboratory(SIL) ground test, Flying Test Bed(FTB) test, KF-X ground test, and KF-X flight test. As a result, the risk factor decreases as stages and tests progress. Therefore, development test and evaluation of KF-X AESA radar are successfully performed at low development risk.

• Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Conference
• /
• 2005.05a
• /
• pp.41-42
• /
• 2005

• Journal of the Korean Society for Heat Treatment
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.119-125
• /
• 2005