• 제목/요약/키워드: surrender

검색결과 42건 처리시간 0.027초

우연한 패권거부 - 미국의 세계리더십 거부와 중국의 틈새공략 - (The Accidental Denial of a Hegemonic Power's Role - The Reluctance of the U.S's Role as a World Leader and China's Target of a Niche Market -)

  • 반길주
    • Strategy21
    • /
    • 통권42호
    • /
    • pp.224-257
    • /
    • 2017
  • As the Trump administration withdraws the Paris Climate Agreement and shows its antipathy toward free trade, the U.S.'s soft power is most likely to weaken and its behaviors could be perceived as acts to surrender the U.S. hegemonic leadership in the world stage. Hegemonic stability theory notes that the existence of a hegemonic power contributes to international stability in the sense that it provides international public goods. A lack of the U.S's leadership in international politics, however, could be recognized as its denial of a hegemonic status. Is it intentional or accidental? The U.S's denial of hegemonic roles is the byproduct of the Trump administration's "American First" policy, not the showcase of its intention to transit hegemony to others. What is noteworthy is that China targets a niche market of hegemony as the U.S. denies its roles as the international leader. Put it another way, China attempts to ride hegemony for free when the U.S. denies its hegemonic roles accidentally. Faced with a niche market of hegemony, China has begun to accelerate its national strategy to make "Chinese Dream" come true. To that end, China promised again to keep the Paris Climate Agreement and attempts to play more active its roles in Shanghai Cooperation Organization(SCO), Asia Infra Investment Bank(AIIB), and "One Belt, One Road". Despite all these efforts, the U.S. is most likely to withdraw its denial of hegemony any time soon. The U.S's resumption of Freedom of Navigation Operations(FONOPs) could be a precursor of the return to a hegemonic power's willingness. In this vein, it is noteworthy that the South China Sea serves as a quasi-war zone for hegemonic conflict.

군사사상의 학문적 고찰 (A Scientific Consideration of Military Thought)

  • 진석용
    • 안보군사학연구
    • /
    • 통권7호
    • /
    • pp.1-24
    • /
    • 2009
  • This article deals with military thought in general. First I tried to distinguish 'thought' from 'theory', 'philosophy', and 'principle'. Thought means the act of thinking about or considering something, an idea or opinion, or a set of ideas about a particular subject, e.g. military affairs in the present discussion. Theory means a formal statement of the rules on which a subject of study is based or of ideas which are suggested to explain a fact or event or, more generally, an opinion or explanation. Philosophy means the use of reason in understanding such things as the nature of reality and existence, the use and limits of knowledge. Principle means a basic idea or rule that explains or controls how something happens or works. Chapter 3 summarized the characteristics of military thoughts into five points', (i) it is closely related with concrete experiences of a nation; (ii) it includes philosophical and logical arguments; (iii) it relies heavily on the political thought of a nation; (iv) it includes necessarily value-judgments; (v) it contains visions of a nation which are not only descriptions or explanations of military affairs, but also evaluations and advocacies. Chapter 4 considers the relation of international political thoughts to military thought. Throughout the history of the modem states system there have been three competing traditions of thought: the Hobbesian or realist tradition, which views international politics as a state of war; the Kantian or universalist tradition, which sees at work in international politics a potential community of mankind; and the Grotian or internationalist tradition, which views international politics as taking place within an international society. Chapter 5 considers the law of war, which is a body of law concerning acceptable justifications to engage in war (jus ad bellum) and the limits to acceptable wartime conduct (jus in bello). Among other issues, modem laws of war address declarations of war, acceptance of surrender and the treatment of prisoners of war, military necessity along with distinction and proportionality, and the prohibition of certain weapons that may cause unnecessary suffering.

  • PDF

압축력을 받는 선체판의 경계조건에 따른 탄소성거동에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Elasto-Plasticity Behaviour of a Ship's Plate under Thrust According to Boundary Condition)

  • 고재용;박주신;박성현
    • 해양환경안전학회지
    • /
    • 제10권1호
    • /
    • pp.29-33
    • /
    • 2004
  • 지금까지의 강구조설계에서는 일반적인 탄성좌굴개념을 적용하고 있다. 왜냐하면 현재까지의 실적선의 데이터와 경험적인 방법에 의해 도출된 여러 가지 룰에 의한 데이터가 상당히 신뢰할만한 정도를 갖고 있기 때문이라고 판단하기 때문이다. 그러나, 최근들어 판두께가 박판인 고장력강재가 선체에 폭넓게 사용되어지면서 탄성좌굴발생 시점이 빨라졌으며 이에따른 탄소성거동을 정확히 예측할 필요성이 대두되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 선체의 이중저 판넬구조에서 압축하중을 받을때의 실제판부재의 주변지지조건을 네가지로 이성화하여 해석하였으며, 이때 실제 필연적으로 존재하게 되는 열가공에 의한 비대칭형 초기처짐을 적용하였고, 비선형해석기법으로서는 Arc-length method를 적용하였고 해석코드는 범용유한요소법 소프트웨어로 잘 알려진 ANSYS를 사용하였다.

  • PDF

Putting Michael McKeon to the "Question": Is Clarissa Harlowe a Prude or Saint?

  • Chung, Ewha
    • 영어영문학
    • /
    • 제57권6호
    • /
    • pp.1131-1149
    • /
    • 2011
  • Michael McKeon, in The Origins of the English Novel, 1600-1740, sets forth a theoretical study of a large canon of seventeenth- and eighteenthcentury works, based upon the dialectic of genre formations, which attempts to analyze certain "instabilities" in generic and social categories- "instabilities" that McKeon identifies as "Questions of Truth" and "Questions of Virtue." In this paper, I argue with McKeon's optimistic reading of Samuel Richardson's work, Clarissa, or The History of Young Lady (1740), which concludes that-unlike Pamela's "manifest material and social empowerment"-Clarissa acquires "manifest discursive and imaginative empowerment" and "wins" (to use McKeon's terms) the "battle" with her antagonist, Robert Lovelace. What is difficult to accept in this reading of Clarissa is McKeon's claim that the "success" of Clarissa's resistance to Lovelace, despite the tragic rape, is evident in her "new-found power" which is represented in the heroine's spiritual "conversion"- her decision to die to protect her "version of truth and virtue." McKeon's spiritual "conversion" not only forces Clarissa to surrender her legal right to prosecute her rapist but also forces her to seek the shelter of her "father's house" in the afterlife because she can no longer "make others accept [her] own version of events as authoritative." Thus, in contrast to McKeon, I claim that Clarissa represents the necessary conditions for its heroine's "empowerment" primarily in language that suggests her manifest social invalidation; language which in particular emphasizes that her rape and torture by Lovelace forces Clarissa's spiritual "conversion" to seek her reward in the afterlife-thereby concluding that Clarissa's discursive and imaginative empowerment does not and cannot exist in the secular, material world.

신(新)무역물류환경의 특성을 적용한 수출대금 결제유형 선택연구 (A Study on the Choice of Export Payment Types by Applying the Characteristics of the New Trade & Logistics Environment)

  • 김창봉;이동준
    • 무역학회지
    • /
    • 제48권4호
    • /
    • pp.303-320
    • /
    • 2023
  • 최근 수출입기업은 무역대금 결제과정과 방식을 선택하면서 신용장보다 T/T 송금과 Surrender B/L을 더 유용하게 이용하고 있으며 신(新)무역물류환경의 특성이 4IR 시대에 들어 강력하게 작용하고 있어 서류에 기반한 무역거래가 선하증권의 전자화나 스마트 계약의 발전으로 인해 새로운 국면을 맞이하고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 수출기업이 협상 요인에 따라 수출대금 결제유형 선택이 달라지는지를 검증하고 신(新)무역물류환경의 특성을 적용하여 논하는 것이다. 분석을 위한 데이터는 설문을 통해 수집하였으며, 업체 직접방문, e-mail, fax, 온라인 설문, 등기우편회수 등으로 회수하였다. 설문배포기간은 2023년 2월 1일~2023년 4월 30일까지이며 2,000부가 배포되어 447부가 회수되고(회수율 22.4%), 본 연구의 목적에 부적합한 111부를 제외한 최종 336부의 데이터가 사용되었다. 아래는 연구의 결과를 나타낸다. 첫째, 협상 요인 중 수출기업이 가지는 제품 차별성은 수출대금 결제유형 선택에 유의한 영향을 미치지 못하였다. 둘째, 협상 요인 중 수출기업이 인식하는 수입기업 구매우위가 높아질수록 사후송금방식이 더 큰 가능성으로 선택되었다. 본 연구는 이와 같은 분석 결과에 더하여 향후 수출기업이 수출대금 결제유형을 선택하면서 신(新)무역물류환경의 특성이 적용된 블록체인기술기반 선하증권, 무역금융플랫폼 등과 같은 새로운 방식의 결제를 고려해야 할 필요성을 제언하였다. 따라서 수출기업은 예컨대 선하증권 위기현상에 대응하는 무역서류의 디지털화 시도 등에 지속적인 관심을 보여야 할 것이고, 후속 연구에서는 국내의 부족한 사회적 인식을 해외선진연구를 통해 제고할 필요가 있을 것으로 기대한다.

독립보증상의 수익자에 의한 부당청구(unfair calling)에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Unfair Calling under the Independent Guarantee)

  • 오원석;손명옥
    • 무역상무연구
    • /
    • 제42권
    • /
    • pp.133-160
    • /
    • 2009
  • In International trade the buyer and seller are normally separated from on another not only by distance but also by differences in language and culture. It is rarely possible for the performance of obligations to be simultaneous and the performance of contracts therefore calls for trust in a situation in which the parties are unlikely to feel able to trust each other unless they have a longstanding and successful relationship. Thus the seller under an international contract of sale will not wish to surrender documents of title to goods to the buyer until he has at least an assurance of payment, and no buyer will wish to pay for goods until he has received them. A gap of distrust thus exists which is often bridged by the undertaking of an intermediary known and trusted by both parties who will undertake on his own liability to pay the seller the contract price in return for the documents of title and then pass the documents to the buyer in return for the reimbursement. This is a common explanation of the theory behind the documentary letter of credit in which the undertaking of a bank of international repute serves as a "guarantee" to each party that the other will perform his obligations. The independence principle, also referred to as the "autonomy principle", is at the core of letter of credit or bank guarantee law. This principle provides that the letter of credit or bank guarantee is independent of the underlying contractual commitment - that is, the transaction that the credit is intented to secure - between the applicant and the beneficiary ; the credit is also independent of the relationship between the bank and its customer, the applicant. The most important exception to the independence principle is the doctrine of fraud in the transaction. A strict interpretation of the rule that the guarantee is independent of the underlying transaction would lead to the conclusion that neither fraud nor manifest abuse of rights by the beneficiary would constitute an objection to payment. There is one major problem related to "Independent guarantees", namely abusive or unfair callings. The beneficiary may make an unfair calling under the guarantee. The countermeasure of beneficiary's unfair calling divided three cases. First, advance countermeasure namely by contract. In other words, when the formation of the contract, the parties must insert the Force Majeure Clause, Arbitration Clause to Contract, and clear statement to the condition for demand calling. Second, post countermeasure namely by court. Many countries, including the United States, authorize the courts to grant an order enjoining the issuer from paying or enjoining the beneficiary from receiving payment under the guaranty letter. Third, Export Insurance. For example, the Export Credit Guarantees Department is prepared, subject to certain conditions, to cover the risk of unfair calling. Of course, KEIC in Korea is cover the risk of the all things for guarantees. On international projects, contractor performance is usually guaranteed by either a standby letters of credit or Independent guarantee. These instruments will be care the parties.

  • PDF

망각과 운명애 - 장자의 망(忘)과 안지약명(安之若命)을 중심으로 - (The forgetting and Amor Fati)

  • 곽소현
    • 철학연구
    • /
    • 제130권
    • /
    • pp.1-22
    • /
    • 2014
  • 이 글의 목적은 '안지약명(安之若命)'으로 대표되는 장자 운명관을 현실 체념적이고 노예적인 순응주의로 간주하는 이택후(李澤厚)의 입장과 해석상의 충돌을 시도하고 장자의 입장이 참된 운명 긍정론임을 밝히는 것이다. 이것은 특히 망(忘)의 역할 분석을 통해 진행된다. 그 결과 새롭게 창조되는 가치는 두 가지다. 하나는 통상적으로 인식의 결여나 질병 상태 등 부정적 기능으로 간주되어 온 망각의 긍정적 역할이며, 다른 하나는 몸 생사 세계 변화를 일기(一氣)의 운행으로 통찰함으로써 운명에 긍정적으로 대처하는 '기 통하는 인간'의 가능성이다. 이러한 논의를 위한 글의 전개는 다음과 같다. 먼저 명(命)의 용례 분석을 통해 '안지약명(安之若命)'의 의미를 밝힌다. 분석 결과 안지약명은 '인간의 힘으로 어찌할 수 없는 상황 앞에서는 마음 편히 운명을 따르라'는 의미다. 다음으로 안지약명을 노예적 순응주의로 간주하는 이택후의 입장에 반대해 장자 입장이 운명 긍정론임을 밝힌다. 이것은 장자의 운명 대면법을 네 단계로 추적함으로써 진행된다. 첫째 부득이(不得已)한 운명적 상황을 있는 그대로 직시한다. 둘째 이 때 망각을 통해서 인간적 애락(哀樂)의 고통과 물아(物我) 구분을 해소한다. 셋째, 몸 생사 세계 변화를 일기(一氣)의 운행으로 통찰한다. 넷째, 이러한 과정은 운명 앞에 긍정적으로 대처하는 기(氣) 통하는 인간을 탄생시킨다. 그는 왜 운명 앞에서 긍정적일 수 있는가? 기 통하는 인간은 사물의 이치에 통달하고 그것의 흐름에 따라서 자유자재로 변화하며, 그 결과 외계 사물로 인해 자신의 생명을 해치지 않는다. 따라서 어떤 운명적 상황 앞에서도 사태를 있는 그대로 긍정하며 담담히 포용할 수 있다. 즉 장자의 기 통하는 인간은 운명을 긍정한다. 여기서 이택후의 비판은 극복된다. 필자는 이처럼 부득이한 운명 앞에서 비관 혹은 도피나 노예적 순응이 아닌 적극적 대면과 긍정적 포용의 태도를 취하는 장자의 안지약명을 '장자의 운명애'라고 부를 수 있다고 본다. 이러한 점에도 불구하고 필자는 '기 통하는 인간'의 실제적 가능성과 역할 등에 관해서는 면밀히 논하지 못했다. 이것은 장자의 기론과 수양론을 연관시켜 분석할 때 밝혀질 수 있는 문제들이다. 이러한 점에 대해서는 차후의 지면을 통해 좀 더 구체적인 논의를 진행할 수 있기를 바란다.

식민지 타이완의 기억을 그리는 현대 일본 작가들의 서로 다른 두 가지 시선 - 쓰시마 유코 『너무나 야만스러운(あまりに野蛮な)』과 요시다 슈이치 『루(路)』 (Two Different Perspectives of Contemporary Japanese Writers Tracing the Memories of Colonial Taiwan - Tsushima Yuko's Too Savage and Yoshida Shuichi's Road)

  • 조영준
    • 비교문화연구
    • /
    • 제41권
    • /
    • pp.57-84
    • /
    • 2015
  • 일본이 타이완을 통치하던 시기에는 식민지 타이완을 작품의 무대로 삼은 일본인 작가가 많이 있었지만, 일본의 패전으로 타이완이 광복을 맞게 된 후로 이러한 현상은 거의 그 자취를 감추게 된다. 하지만 21세기 들어 일본과 타이완의 관계가 점점 더 긴밀해지는 가운데 일본과 타이완을 배경으로 하여 근대부터 이어져 온 양국의 관계를 부각시키는 소설과 영화가 계속해서 등장하고 있다. 쓰시마 유코의 2008년 작 "너무나 야만스러운(あまりに野?な)"과 요시다 슈이치의 2012년 작 "루(路)"도 이러한 양국을 포함한 동아시아의 역사 정치적 기류의 변화 속에서 탄생한 작품이라고 할 수 있겠다. 이 두 작품은 일본과 타이완 양국을 작품의 무대로 삼아 식민지 타이완의 기억을 다루고 있다는 공통점이 있지만, 이를 그리는 두 작가의 시선과 관점은 사뭇 다른 것이다. 이에 본고에서는 서로 다른 방식으로 양국의 관계와 식민지 타이완의 기억을 그리는 두 작가의 서로 다른 서사 전략과 그 의미에 대해 비교 고찰해본다. 한국과 비슷한 근현대사를 겪은 타이완을 작품의 무대로 삼은 일본 작가들의 근작에 관한 연구는 우리에게도 의미가 있는 작업이 될 것이며, 이는 또한 복잡하게 얽혀있는 동아시아 근대사에 대한 반추와 이와 관련된 문학 문화 비평에 대한 재고의 기회가 될 것으로 기대한다.

투자협정중재에 의한 중재판정의 승인·집행에 대한 뉴욕협약 적용에 관한 고찰 (A Study on the Application of the New York Convention in the Recognition and Enforcement of ISDS Arbitral Awards)

  • 강수미
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제29권1호
    • /
    • pp.31-52
    • /
    • 2019
  • As international transactions have grown more numerous, situations of disputes related to the transactions are getting more complicated and more diverse. Cost-effective remedies to settle the disputes through traditional methods such as adjudications of a court will be insufficient. There fore, nations are attempting to more efficiently solve investor-state disputes through arbitration under organizations such as the ICSID Convention, the ICSID Additionary Facility Rules, and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules by including the provisions on investor-state dispute settlement at the conclusion of an investment agreement. In case of an arbitration under the ICSID Convention, ICSID directly exercises the supervisorial function on arbitral proceedings, and there is no room for the intervention of national courts. In time of the arbitration where the ICSID Convention does not apply, however, the courts have to facilitate the arbitral proceedings. When the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award under the ICSID Convention are guaranteed by the Convention, it should be considered that the New York Convention does not apply to them under the Convention Article 7 (1) fore-end. In exceptional cases in which an arbitral award under the ICSID Convention cannot be recognized or enforced by the Convention, the New York Convention applies to the recognition and enforcement because the award is not a domestic award of the country in which the recognition or enforcement is sought. It is up to an interpretation of the New York Convention whether the New York Convention applies to ISDS arbitral awards not based on the ICSID Convention or not. Although an act of the host country is about sovereign activities, a host country and the country an investor is in concurring to the investment agreement with the ISDS provisions is considered a surrender of sovereignty immunity, and it will not suffice to exclude the investment disputes from the scope of application of the New York Convention. If the party to the investment agreement has declared commercial reservation at its accession into the New York Convention, it should be viewed that the Convention applies to the recognition and enforcement of the ISDS awards to settle the disputes over an investitive act, inasmuch as the act will be considered as a commercial transaction. When the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award on investment disputes about a nation's sovereign act have been sought in Korea and Korea has been designated the place of the investment agreement arbitration as a third country, it should be reviewed whether the disputes receive arbitrability under the Korean Arbitration Act or not.

History of Land Registration and Small House Policies in the New Territories of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the People's Republic of China

  • Fung, Philip Sing-Sang;Lee, Almond Sze-Mun
    • 토지주택연구
    • /
    • 제5권1호
    • /
    • pp.53-56
    • /
    • 2014
  • Hong Kong, a well-known metropolis characterized by skyscrapers on both sides of the Victoria Harbour, consists mainly of 3 parts, namely the Hong Kong Island, the Kowloon peninsula and the New Territories (N.T.) which is the land area north of Kowloon plus a number of outlying islands. Located in the N.T. are all the new towns, market towns; and in the plains and valleys lie scattered village houses of not more than 3 storeys within the confines of well-defined village. These village houses are governed by a rural housing policy that could be traced back to the very beginning of the former British administration in the N.T. By the Convention of Peking of 1898, the N.T., comprising the massive land area north of Kowloon up to Shenzhen River and 235 islands, was leased to Britain by China for 99 years from 1st July 1898. Soon after occupation, the colonial government conducted a survey of this uncharted territory from 1899 to 1903, and set up a land court to facilitate all land registration work and to resolve disputed claims. By 1905, the Block Crown Leases with Schedule of Lessees and details of the lots, each with a copy of the lot index plan (Demarcation Plan) were executed. Based on the above, Crown rent rolls were prepared for record and rent collection purposes. All grants of land thereafter are known as New Grant lots. After completion and execution of the Block Crown Lease in 1905, N.T. villagers had to purchase village house lots by means of Restricted Village Auctions; and Building Licences were issued to convert private agricultural land for building purposes but gradually replaced by Land Exchanges (i.e. to surrender agricultural land for the re-grant of building land) from the early 1960's until introduction of the current Small House Policy in October 1972. It was not until the current New Territories Small House Policy came into effect in December 1972 that the Land Authority can make direct grant of government land or approve the conversion of self-owned agricultural land to allow indigenous villagers to build houses within the village environs under concessionary terms. Such houses are currently restricted to 700 square feet in area and three storeys with a maximum height of 27 feet. An indigenous villager is a male descendent of a villager who was the resident of a recognized village already existing in 1898. Each villager is only allowed one concessionary grant in his lifetime. Upon return of Hong Kong to the People's Republic of China on July 1st, 1997, the traditional rights of indigenous villagers are protected under Article 40 of the Basic Law (a mini-constitution of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region). Also all N.T. leases have been extended for 50 years up to 2047. Owing to the escalating demand and spiral landed property prices in recent years, abuse of the N.T. Small House Policy has been reported in some areas and is a concern in some quarters. The Hong Kong Institute of Land Administration attempts to study the history that leads to the current rural housing policy in the New Territories with particular emphasis on the small house policy, hoping that some light can be shed on the "way forward" for such a controversial policy.