• Strategy21
• /
• 통권38호
• /
• pp.163-192
• /
• 2015

This study is intended for the Maritime Boundaries(Baseline) of the Unified Korea. According to the international law, North-Korea is recognized as a nation. Then with unification, the state succession will be a very important issue. Thus we should seek for the expected problems and counter-measures, by analyzing of the State-succession. There is a conflict of the positive or negative reaction about the state succession. However, in general, 'the principle of continuity' has been applied for at the national border treaty, regardless of the type of State succession. This can be found on Article 11 & 12 of the 「1978 Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties」, Article 62, paragraph 2 of the 「1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties」, and a series of international case law. Currently it is being understood as customary international law. In summary, although South and North Korea, China, Russia and Japan are not the parties of 「1978 Vienna Convention」, the unified Korea will necessarily have a duty to succeed national boundaries(also, maritime baseline) of North Korea. Specifically, we have an objective and rigorous review of the treaty of maritime baseline that is signed between North Korea and neighboring countries, such as 「National Border Treaty Regime between North Korea and China」 and 「Treaty between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Democratic people's Republic of Korea on the Demarcation of the Soviet-Korea National Border」. Also, we analyzed 'Historical Bays' and 'Straight Baseline' system. By this, we are able to occupy a favorable position when renegotiating with neighboring countries, at the point of unification.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.201-216
• /
• 2018

After the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Union's Common Commercial Policy now belongs to the exclusive competence area of the EU, including the foreign direct investment (FDI) policy. Regarding the bilateral investment protection treaties (BITs) between the EU Member States, the European Commission is of the view that such BITs should be discarded. On March 6, 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held in the Achmea BV v. Slovakia case that a BIT between the EU Member States, as well as arbitral awards based on that BIT, is not subject to request for preliminary rulings under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and thus they are not compatible with the EU law. However, the judgment did not silence the controversy. Instead, many people questioned the legal reasoning and the legitimacy of judgment, and therefore the problem is still ongoing.

• 한국환경생태학회지
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.474-484
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 중국 자연보호구의 현행 법률 및 법체계와 역사, 조직, 예산 등 관리체계를 분석하여 중국의 보호지역 관리를 위한 기초적 자료를 제공할 목적으로 수행되었다. 법체계는 "중화인민공화국 헌법(1954)"에 의거하여 "환경보호법(1989)", "자연보호구 조례(1994)", "자연보호구 토지 관리 방법(1995)"이 제정되었다. 자연보호구의 발전과정은 시작단계(1956-1965), 정지단계(1966-1978), 발전 단계(1979-1998), 급증 단계(1999-2006), 안정 단계(2007-현재)로 나눌 수 있으며, 안정단계에서는 생태 환경의 보호, 감독, 관리 강화 등 5단계로 분류된다. 중국 자연보호구는 법에 의거하여 국가급, 성급, 시급, 현급으로 분류하고, 자원유형별로는 자연생태체계류, 야생생물류, 자연유적류로 나누고 있다. 전체 자연보호구 2,640개소 중 임업부가 관리하고 있는 자연보호구는 1,958개(전국 수량의 74.2%) 로 가장 높은 비율을 차지하고 있다. 자연보호구 1,384개소(52.4%)에 관리조직이 건립되어 있으며, 관리조직 유 무에 상관없이 관리인원을 배치한 자연보호구는 1,702개소(64.47%)로 관리조직이 있는 비율보다 높게 나타났다.