• Title/Summary/Keyword: spherical equivalents

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

The Study of Abnormal Refraction Eye on Women Population of University Students in South-East Korea (한국 동남지역 여대생들의 굴절이상 눈에 대한 연구)

  • Choi, Hoe-Sung;Jung, Su-Ja;Kim, Douk-Hoon
    • Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
    • /
    • v.13 no.1
    • /
    • pp.125-129
    • /
    • 2008
  • Purpose: To research the study of abnormal refraction eye on women population of university students in South - East Korea. Methods: Between March 2007 and October 2007, the refraction test of eye glasses wearer was evaluated on women population (367 students, aged 19~22 years) of university in living on Kyung-Nam and Pusan province. Data was analysed with T-test. Results: On the abnormal refraction status, Compound Myopic Astigmatism was 76.72%, simple myopia was 10.90%, mixed astigmatism was 6.27%, respectively. On the prevalence of myopic power, low was 59.57%, moderate was 24.93%, high was 15.49%, respectively. On the myopic equivalent power, the right eye had more increase to compare to left eye. but these was not a statically significant correlation (p<0.5) between the right and left eyes. On the anisometropia of spherical equivalents and cylinder power, most subjects was under 1.0 diopter. On the other hand, the type of astigmatic axis was with-the rule (70.79%), against -the rule (18.41%), and oblique (10.80%). Conclusions: This study identify that the refraction status of abnormal refraction eye on women population in university students in South-East Korea have been more increased prevalence the myopia and astigmatism.

  • PDF

Comparison of Central and Peripheral Refraction in Myopic Eyes after Corneal Refractive Surgery and Emmetropes (굴절교정수술을 받은 근시안과 정시안에서 중심부 및 주변부의 굴절력 비교)

  • Kim, Jeong-Mee;Lee, Koon-Ja
    • Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.157-165
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose: To evaluate changes in central and peripheral refraction along the horizontal visual fields in myopic corneal refractive surgery group compared with emmetropes. Methods: One hundred twenty eyes of 60 subjects ($23.56{\pm}2.54$ years, range: 20 to 29) who underwent myopic refractive surgery and 40 eyes of 20 emmetropes ($22.50{\pm}1.74$ years, range: 20 to 25) were enrolled. The central and peripheral refractions were measured along the horizontal meridianat $5^{\circ}$, $10^{\circ}$, $15^{\circ}$, $20^{\circ}$, $25^{\circ}$ in the nasal and temporal areas using an open-field autorefractor. For analysis of post-op group, the group was classified by pre-op spherical equivalents of < -6.00 D and ${\geq}-6.00D$ as two post-op groups. Results: Pre-op spherical equivalent was $-4.56{\pm}0.92D$ (rang: -2.50 to -5.58 D) in post-op group 1, and $-7.09{\pm}0.96D$ (rang: -6.00 to -9.00 D) in post-op group 2. Spherical equivalent (M) in the emmetropes ranged from $-0.20{\pm}0.22D$ at center to $-0.64{\pm}0.83D$ at $25^{\circ}$ in the temporal visual field and to $-0.20{\pm}0.67D$ at $25^{\circ}$ in the nasal visual field; M in post-op group 1 ranged from $-0.16{\pm}0.29D$ at center to $-5.29{\pm}1.82D$ at $25^{\circ}$ in the temporal visual field and to $-4.48{\pm}1.88D$ at $25^{\circ}$ in the nasal visual field; M in post-op group 2 ranged from $-0.20{\pm}0.32D$ at center to $-7.98{\pm}2.08D$ at $25^{\circ}$ in the temporal visual field and to $-7.90{\pm}2.26D$ at $25^{\circ}$ in the nasal visual field. Among the three groups, there was no significant difference in M at central visual field (p=0.600) and at $5^{\circ}$ in the temporal visual field (p=0.647), whereas, there was significant difference in M at paracentral and peripheral visual field (p=0.000). Conclusions: Emmetropes had relatively constant refractive errors throughout the central and peripheral visual field and showed myopic peripheral defocus along the horizontal visual field. On the other hand, in myopic corneal refractive surgery group, there were significant differences in refractive errors between the central and peripheral visual field compared with differences in the central and peripheral refraction patterns of emmetropes.