• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.237-269
• /
• 2016

Asia-Pacific Space Cooperation Organization (APSCO) is the only intergovernmental space cooperation organization in Asia. Since its establishment to date, eight countries have signed the convention and become member states. South Korea participated actively in the preparatory phase of creating the organization, and one conference organized by AP-MCSTA which is the predecessor of APSCO was held in South Korea. However, after the APSCO Convention was opened for signature in 2005 to date, South Korea does not ratify the Convention and become a member. The rapid development of space commercialization and privatization, as well as the fastest growing commercial space market in Asia, provides opportunities for Asian countries to cooperate with each other in relevant space fields. And to participate in the existing cooperation framework (e.g., the APSCO) by the Asian space countries (e.g., South Korea) could be a proper choice. Even if the essential cooperation in particular space fields is challenging, joint space programs among different Asian countries for dealing with the common events can be initiated at the first steps. Since APSCO has learned the successful legal arrangements from ESA, the legal measures established by its Convention are believed to be qualified to ensure the achievement of benefits of different member states. For example, the regulation of the "fair return" principle confirms that the return of interests from the relevant programs is in proportion to the member's investment in the programs. Moreover, the distinguish of basic and optional activities intends to authorize the freedom of the members to choose programs to participate. And for the voting procedure, the acceptance of the "consensus" by the Council is in favor of protecting the member's interest when making decisions. However, political factors that are potential to block the participation of South Korea in APSCO are difficult to be ignored. A recent event is an announcement of deploying THAAD by South Korea, which causes tension between South Korea and China. The cooperation between these two states in space activities will be influenced. A long-standing barrier is that China acts as a non-member of the main international export control mechanism, i.e., the MTCR. The U.S takes this fact as the main reason to prevent South Korea to cooperate with China in developing space programs. Although the political factors that will block the participation of South Korea in APSCO are not easy to removed shortly, legal measures can be taken to reduce the political influence. More specifically, APSCO is recommended to ensure the achievement of commercial interests of different cooperation programs by regulating precisely the implementation of the "fair return" principle. Furthermore, APSCO is also suggested to contribute to managing the common regional events by sharing satellite data. And it is anticipated that these measures can effectively response the requirements of the rapid development of space commercialization and the increasing common needs of Asia, thereby to provide a platform for the further cooperation. In addition, in order to directly reduce the political influence, two legal measures are necessary to be taken: Firstly, to clarify the rights and responsibilities of the host state (i.e., China) as providing assistance, coordination and services to the management of the Organization to release the worries of the other member states that the host state will control the Organization's activities. And secondly, to illustrate that the cooperation in APSCO is for the non-military purpose (a narrow sense of "peaceful purpose") to reduce the political concerns. Regional cooperation in Asia regarding space affairs is considered to be a general trend in the future, so if the participation of South Korea in APSCO can be finally proved to be feasible, there will be an opportunity to discuss the creation of a comprehensive institutionalized framework for space cooperation in Asia.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.61-73
• /
• 2002

The aim of this study is to understand the modernization process of interior spaces in the Korean housing, focused not only on the architectural aspects, but also on the sociological, anthropological and feministic aspects of housing. The development of korean housing from the period of traditional agricultural society and Japanese domination through the period of industrial development to the period of modem industrial society have been reviewed not from the Point of westernization but from the point of Korean own needs for modernity. It also tried to find the determinants of the relationship between social behavior patterns and space organization through historical change of housing plans. As a result, it was found the various western impacts to the continuation or change of Korean housing culture in the modernization process. Consequently this study comes to the concrete results as follows; 1) sociological aspect: The early layout of floorplans, that promoted the communication and contact between the user were changed. The layout of spaces in the modern housing tends to be not interdependence each other and be very isolated from the outdoor spaces. Those Phenomena reflect the trends to the Individualization, equivalence and privatization in the life of family. 2) feministic aspects: Differently from the early kitchen, modern ones locates in the internal space in the housing and the dinning area is appeared. And also the standing work at the kitchen war usually spreaded. Such changes are due to the emancipation of the women and downfall of the subordinate relationship between the genders. 3) anthropological aspects: The lifestyle, in which the user was mostly sitting on the floor, was constantly disappeared by using of furnitures that determines the function of each spaces in the housing. Those change demonstrate the change of behavior Patterns, thus, the needs of differentiation of function as well as the feministic needs. In other word, the coexistence of both fields of work and relax is required. 4) tectonic aspects: In the indoor space of modern housing the rooms are closed each other. Thus, concentrated circulation system act to separate these spaces. It is concrete spatial element that mostly shows the synthetic character of modem housing.

• 한국주거학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국주거학회 2008년 추계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.437-441
• /
• 2008

The community mixed-support facility in Japan is making efforts to try various approaches according to the changes made to allow the privatization of public facilities on the basis of Act on Special Measures for Urban Regeneration since 2004. Due to this change in policy, the community mixed-support facility is now taking further steps in trying to implement variety of approaches in the perspective of urban regeneration and urban maintenance and at the same time the trend of installation of community facility has gone through vivid changes for the last 20 years. The causes of this are from the social demand that claims for of new facilities and the change in the subsidy system in relation to equality in facility installation. Examples of the first cause can be the building of perpetuating educational society, an execution or a movement towards the society of gender equality, a countermovement for an aging society as well as a welfare society, and recently social phenomenon related to consumption is becoming an issue. And for the last, the number of construction of facilities is increasing that grow out of the traditional facility system. The complex of community mixed-support facility will provide public administrative and community mixed-support services to local people as well as to form a notion of community and a feeling of solidarity. Ultimately, this will develop local areas by regional interchanging of information. In this very research, we will analyze the community mixed-support facility and its characteristics as well as its implications and consider the types of complex through many preceding instances in Japanese community mixed-support facility.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제28권6호
• /
• pp.81-94
• /
• 2010

This qualitative research was designed to explore the use of housing among Korean Chinese people in Harbin, China. Focusing on the use which based on the epistemology of housing adjustment, this was particularly designed to examine its cultural assimilation and acculturation on the way of life course, it employed the in-depth interview on the oral history of 5 interviewees in their 60s and 70s, individualized interviews were conducted from May 28 to 31 in 2010. Key findings were summarized as follows; 1. The free market reform in China resulted in privatization that allowed respondents to become homeowners, and the ownership was viewed as part of family asset centered upon a sense of solidarity. 2. Although homeowners in multi-story houses were responsible to decorate interior spaces, the common features in using interior spaces were found: entrance had no thresholds; kitchen was small, lack of storage cabinets, tile-flooring; washers were installed inside bathroom; and newly built apartment didn't have proper space to store Korean fermented foods. It was observed that housing adaptation outweighed housing adjustment. Those who used to live in Chinese houses with indoor-wearing-shoes or Russian houses with indoor-wearing-slippers were receptive to the use of dining table and bed, and the community heating system discouraged the use of individual electric water heater because of high electricity cost. 3. In daily life, eating habit wasn't much changed to the Chinese style, meals were shared, dish sterilizer was popular, and Kimchi fridge wasn't used. Because of the influence of the Chinese culture, such Korean traditions as ancestral rites and bedroom allocation tradition faded away, but traditional family values remained unchanged. In conclusion, Korean Chinese people experience normative housing deficits and adaptation selectively incurred. It's implied that residential design meets the needs resulting from the dual culture in terms of cultural assimilation and acculturation.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.87-107
• /
• 2005

지상원격탐사(Land Remote Sensing)란 멀리 떨어져 있는 지상 지하 대상물의 특성과 현상을 접촉하지 않고 관측하여 정보를 얻어내는 기술이라 정의되고 있으며 보다 좁은 의미로는 인공위성을 이용히여 우주공간으로부터 지표를 관측탐사하여 영상등 정보를 얻는 기술을 의미하는 것으로 받아들여지고 있다. 원격탐사기술은 원래 군사 및 정보 수집을 위한 목적으로 엄격히 제한되어 발전되어왔으나 1970년대 이후 점차 그 기술이 민간에 이전되어 상업화의 길을 걷게 되었다. 최근에는 지상원격탐사영상을 촬영할 수 있는 상업위성을 자체 보유하고 있는 업체까지 등장하여 최고 0.61m 해상도의 정밀위성영상을 시장에 유통시키게 되었다. 지상원격탐사의 민영화와 상업화 경향은 위성영상을 재해예방, 지도제작, 자원탐사 등에 유용하게 사용할수 있도록 하는 장점이 있지만 정밀위성영상이 피탐사국에 공격의도를 갖고 있는 국가나 단체 등에 입수될 경우 피탐사국의 국가안보를 심각하게 위협할 수 있는 가능성도 있다. 지상원격탐사기술의 최선진국인 미국은 이미 1990년대 초반부터 이러한 점을 인식하고 지상원격탐사산업을 통제하기 위한 입법적 보완책을 마련하여 왔으며 현재 국가안보를 이유로 지상원격탐사산업을 규제할 수 있는 여러 제도들을 갖추고 있다. 미국은 지상원격탐사정책법에 의하여 연방해양대기국에 유보된 허가권의 행사를 통하여 0.5m 이상 고해상도 위성영상의 촬영을 막고 촬영 후 24시간 동안 위성영상의 유통을 금하고 있으며, 1994년에는 국가안보를 이유로 지상원격탐사를 금지할 수 있도록 한 'Shutter Control'제도를 규정한 대통령령 제23호를 제정한바 있다. 위 대통령령은 2003. 'U.S. Commercial Remote Sensing Policy'로 대체되어 한층 강화되고 구체적인 규율 내용을 갖게 되었다. 새로운 미국의 지상원격탐사통제제도는 지상원격탐사허가를 내줌에 있어 국방장관과 국무장관이 그 기준을 정하도록 하고, 국가안보를 이유로 한 지상원격탐사금지 및 위성영상 유통제한 제도를 두고 있으며, 유사시 국가안보를 이유로 미국 정부가 민간지상원격탐사시설을 사용할 수 있도록 정하고 있다. 미국과 같은 우주선진국조차 지상원격탐사가 국가안보에 대하여 갖는 중요성을 깊이 인식하고 그 통제를 위한 제도를 갖추고 있다는 점은 분단 상황에 놓인 우리에게 시사 하는바가 크다고 생각한다. 우리의 우주개발진흥법에도 미국을 비롯한 우주선진국들의 지상원격탐사 통제제도를 참작 반영할 수 있도록 지속적인 관심을 기울여야 한다고 본다.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제44권6호
• /
• pp.60-72
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 공공관리 전환 측면에서 논의되고 있는 공원 거버넌스의 사례분석을 통하여 대형 도시공원 조성과 운영관리의 추진방향과 전략을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 최근 대형 도시공원에서 나타나는 민관 파트너십, 거버넌스의 사례는 공공 서비스 전환의 필요성을 나타낸다. 프레시디오 공원과 시드니 하버 국립공원의 조성과정과 운영관리 전략을 분석하여 공원 거버넌스 의미와 효과, 전제조건을 확인하였다. 분석의 틀로 다음의 6가지 항목-정책, 거버넌스, 파트너십, 재정 및 기금, 디자인 및 운영과 관리, 평가와 모니터링-을 선정하고 분석을 수행하였다. 사례 분석을 통해 확인한 점은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 공원 정책수립에서 계획과 운영관리까지 일관성 있게 목표를 추진하는 것이 필요하며, 공원에 대한 권한과 책임을 독립적 운영주체 조직에 이양함으로써 유연한 공원 서비스가 가능하다. 둘째, 트러스트를 중심으로 공공 행정, 비영리민간조직, 민간기업, 지역 커뮤니티단체, 학술기관 등의 폭넓은 파트너십이 구축됨으로써 공원 활동의 다양성이 확대될 수 있다. 셋째, 공원의 경제적 자족성 모색은 공공재정 의존도를 낮추어 위기 대응력을 높이고, 자체적 수익모델을 구성하여 공원의 재투자가 가능한 경제적 선순환 구조를 형성한다. 장기적으로 공원 관리의 질을 높이고, 지역경제와도 연동하는 효과를 만든다. 넷째, 공원 조성 운영관리 실행 체계에서 지역 커뮤니티를 공원의 생산자이며, 소비자로 기능할 수 있도록 하는 보다 다양하고 구체적인 지역커뮤니티 참여 방안과 실행전략이 필요하다. 두 공원에서 시도하고 있는 전략들은 공공 중심의 논의 틀을 민간과 제 3의 섹터, 즉 지역 커뮤니티 그룹으로 전환하고 있다는 측면에서 공원 거버넌스 모델의 지향과 의미를 확인할 수 있다. 그러나 공원에서의 민간 활동에 의한 사유화 우려, 재정적 자족성 확보를 위한 수익운영 정책이 야기하는 공공재 본질성의 침해는 한계로 지적된다. 공원 거버넌스 모델은 앞으로도 대형 도시공원의 지속가능성을 모색해야 하는 시점에서 지속적인 연구와 논의가 필요하다.