• Title/Summary/Keyword: soil/geosynthetic interfaces

Search Result 6, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

Geotechnical Characterization of Waste and Frictional Properties of Geosynthetics Interface (쓰레기의 공학적 특성과 토목섬유재간의 마찰 특성에 관한 연구)

  • 임학수;장연수;최정원
    • Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
    • /
    • 2003.03a
    • /
    • pp.621-628
    • /
    • 2003
  • To prevent the percolation of leachate through the bottom of waste landfills, the liner system of various layers, such as compacted clay, geomembrane, geonet, geotextiles, and geocomposite is designed. Since the friction angle between a geomembrane and other geosynthetics is usually lower than that of the soil alone, the interfaces between soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic-geosynthetic may become a possible plane of weakness, which leads to potential instability of the system under load of waste at side slopes. In this study, large triaxial tests are carried out with samples of remoulded wastes and direct shear interface friction tests are carried out to understand the frictional properties of geosynthetic-geosynthetic interfaces, which are required for analyzing the safety of side-slope liner systems.

  • PDF

Sand-Nonwoven geotextile interfaces shear strength by direct shear and simple shear tests

  • Vieira, Castorina Silva;Lopes, Maria de Lurdes;Caldeira, Laura
    • Geomechanics and Engineering
    • /
    • v.9 no.5
    • /
    • pp.601-618
    • /
    • 2015
  • Soil-reinforcement interaction mechanism is an important issue in the design of geosynthetic reinforced soil structures. This mechanism depends on the soil properties, reinforcement characteristics and interaction between these two elements (soil and reinforcement). In this work the shear strength of sand/geotextile interfaces were characterized through direct and simple shear tests. The direct shear tests were performed on a conventional direct shear device and on a large scale direct shear apparatus. Unreinforced sand and one layer reinforced sand specimens were characterized trough simple shear tests. The interfaces shear strength achieved with the large scale direct shear device were slightly larger than those obtained with the conventional direct shear apparatus. Notwithstanding the differences between the shear strength characterization through simple shear and direct shear tests, it was concluded that the shear strength of one layer reinforced sand is similar to the sand/geotextile interface direct shear strength.

진동대를 이용한 Geomembrane-Geotextile 사이의 동적 접촉마찰특성 평가

  • 김동진;서민우;박준범
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment Conference
    • /
    • 2002.09a
    • /
    • pp.179-182
    • /
    • 2002
  • Geosynthetics are widely used in landfill for filtration, drainage, separation and so on. For many landfill failure cases, interfaces of geosynthetics can be potential failure surfaces. Therefore, it is very Important to estimate the interface properties of geosynthetics. In this study, shaking table tests were peformed between smooth geomembrane and geotextile. From the test results, it was found that there is a limited acceleration that can be transmitted from smooth geomembrane to geotextile. And the influence of normal stress and frequencies of excitation were discussed.

  • PDF

Evaluation of Interface Shear Properties Between Geosynthetics and Soils Through Inclined Board Tests (경사판 시험을 통한 토목섬유와 흙의 접촉 전단 특성 평가)

  • 서민우;신준수;박준범;박인준
    • Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
    • /
    • v.19 no.6
    • /
    • pp.285-298
    • /
    • 2003
  • Shear properies of geosynthetic/geosynthetic and geosynthetic/soil interfaces which are widely met in landfill sites were evaluated from the inclined board tests. The inclined board testing apparatus is known to reproduce the shear behavior on the low normal stress most accurately. In this study, the friction angle of each interface was estimated and the tensile force mobilized at the geosynthetic was measured as well. The test results showed that the friction angle of each interface and the tensile force of the geosynthetics depended on the amount of normal stress, the type of the geosynthetics used, and the combinations of geosynthetics and soils. In addition, the sand/geotextile/geomembrane interface system was simulated in this study, and it was observed that the tensile force developed at the geomembrane decreased due to the protection effect of the geotextile located above the geomembrane. The test results of this research was compared with those of direct shear tests published, too. Finally, by comparing the measured tensile force of the geosynthetics when the initial displacement of the box occurs, when the slope is called as the critical slope, with suggested analytic solution, the accuracy of analytic solution and the applicability to design were identified.

Friction Behavior at the Soil/Geosynthetic Interface in Respect of Efficiency (효율관점에서 흙/토목섬유 접촉면에서의 마찰특성)

  • Ahn, Hyun-Ho;Shim, Seong-Hyeon;Shim, Jai-Beom;Lee, Seok-Won
    • Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
    • /
    • v.23 no.10
    • /
    • pp.65-72
    • /
    • 2007
  • Large-scale direct shear tests were conducted in order to investigate both the shear strength of soil itself and the friction behavior at the interface of soil/geosynthetics in respect of efficiency in this study. Sand, crushed stone and three types of geotextile (i.e. one woven geotextile and two nonwoven geotextiles) were used in the experimental program. The considered interfaces for the evaluation of interface shear strength in this study included sand/sand, crushed stone/crushed stone, sand/woven geotextile, crushed stone/woven geotextile, crushed stone/nonwoven geotextile-A and crushed stone/nonwoven geotextile-B. The results showed that the efficiency of 84% was obtained at the interface of sand/woven geotextile compared with the shear strength of sand itself (i.e. sand/sand interface). The efficiencies of 74%, 83% and 72% were obtained at the interface of crushed stone/nonwoven geotextile-A, crushed stone/nonwoven geotextile-B and crushed stone/woven geotextile, respectively compared with the shear strength of crushed stone itself (i.e. crushed stone/crushed stone interface).

Finite element analysis of a CFRP reinforced retaining wall

  • Ouria, Ahad;Toufigh, Vahab;Desai, Chandrakant;Toufigh, Vahid;Saadatmanesh, Hamid
    • Geomechanics and Engineering
    • /
    • v.10 no.6
    • /
    • pp.757-774
    • /
    • 2016
  • Soils are usually weak in tension therefore different materials such as geosynthetics are used to address this inadequacy. Worldwide annual consumption of geosynthetics is close to $1000million\;m^2$, and the value of these materials is probably close to US$1500 million. Since the total cost of the construction is at least four or five times the cost of the geosynthetic itself, the impact of these materials on civil engineering construction is very large indeed. Nevertheless, there are several significant problems associated with geosynthetics, such as creep, low modulus of elasticity, and susceptibility to aggressive environment. Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) was introduced over two decades ago in the field of structural engineering that can also be used in geotechnical engineering. CFRP has all the benefits associated with geosynthetics and it boasts higher strength, higher modulus, no significant creep and reliability in aggressive environments. In this paper, the performance of a CFRP reinforced retaining wall is investigated using the finite element method. Since the characterization of behavior of soils and interfaces are vital for reliable prediction from the numerical model, soil and interface properties are obtained from comprehensive laboratory tests. Based on the laboratory results for CFRP, backfill soil, and interface data, the finite element model is used to study the behavior of a CFRP reinforced wall. The finite element model was verified based on the results of filed measurements for a reference wall. Then the reference wall simulated by CFRP reinforcements and the results. The results of this investigations showed that the safety factor of CFRP reinforced wall is more and its deformations is less than those for a retaining wall reinforced with ordinary geosynthetics while their construction costs are in similar range.