• Title/Summary/Keyword: sik-hae

Search Result 943, Processing Time 0.024 seconds

금원사대가의학(金元四大家醫學)이 조선조의학(朝鮮朝醫學) 형성(形成)에 미친 영향(影響) (The influence of the four noted physicians of Geum-Won era on the completion of the medicine in the Chosun dynasty)

  • 정면;홍원식
    • 대한한의학원전학회지
    • /
    • 제9권
    • /
    • pp.432-552
    • /
    • 1996
  • The influence of the four noted physicians of Geum-Won era(金元代) on the completion of the medicine in the Chosun dynasty(朝鮮朝) can be summarized as follows. 1. The four noted physicians of Geum-Won era were Yoo-Wan-So(劉完素), Jang-Jong-Jung(張從正), Lee-Go(李杲), Ju-Jin-Heung(朱震亨). 2. Yoo-Wan-So(劉完索) made his theory on the basic of Nae-Kyung("內經") and Sane-Han-Lon("傷寒論"), his idea of medicine was characterized in his books, for exemple, application of O-Oon-Yuk-Ki(五運六氣), Ju-Wha theory(主火論) and hang-hae-seng-je theory(亢害承制論). from his theory and method of study, many deviations of oriental medicine occurred. He made an effort for study of Nae-Kyung, which had been depressed for many years, on the contrary of the way old study that Nae-Kyung had been only explained or revised, he applied the theory of Nae-Kyung to clinical care. The theory of Yuk-Gi-Byung-Gi(六氣病機) and On-Yeul-Byung(溫熱病) had much influenced on his students and posterities, not to mention Jang-Ja-Wha and Ju-Jin-Heung, who were among the four noted physicians therefore he became the father of Yuk-Gi(六氣) and On-Yeul(溫熱) schools. 3. Jang-Jong-Jung(張從正) emulated Yoo-Wan-So as a model, and followed his Yuk-Gi-Chi-Byung(六氣致病) theory, but he insisted on the use of the chiaphoretic, the emetic and the paregoric to get rid of the causes, specially he insisted on the use of the paregoric, so they called him Gong-Ha-Pa(攻下派). He insisted on the theory that if we would strenthen ourselves we should use food, id get rid of cause, should use the paregoric, emetic and diaphoretic. Jang-Jong-Jung'S Gang-Sim-Wha(降心火) theory, which he improved Yoo-Wan-So's Han-Ryang(寒凉) theory influenced to originate Ju-Jin-Heung'S Ja-Eum-Gang-Wha(滋陰降火) theory. 4. Lee-Go(李杲) insisted on the theory that Bi-Wi(脾胃) played a loading role in the physiological function and pathological change, and that the internal disease was originated by the need of Gi(氣) came from the disorder of digestive organs, and that the causes of internal disease were the irregular meal, the overwork, and mental shock. Lee-Go made an effort for study about the struggle of Jung-Sa(正邪) and in the theory of the prescription he asserted the method of Seung-Yang-Bo-Gi(升陽補氣), but he also used the method of Go-Han-Gang-Wha(苦寒降火). 5. The authors of Eui-Hak-Jung-Jun("醫學正傳"), Eui-Hak-Ib-Moon("醫學入門"), and Man-Byung-Whoi-Choon("萬病回春") analyzed the medical theory of the four noted physicians and added their own experiences. They helped organizing existing complicated theories of the four noted physicians imported in our country, and affected the formation of medical science in the Choson dynasty largely. Eui-Hak-Jung-Jun("醫學正傳") was written by Woo-Dan(虞槫), in this book, he quoted the theories of Yoo-Wan-So, Jang-Jong-Jung, Lee-Go, Ju-Jin-Heung, especially, Ju-Jin-Heung was respected by him, it affected the writing of Eui-Lim-Choal-Yo("醫林撮要"). Eui-Hak-ib-Moon("醫學入門"), written by Lee-Chun(李杲), followed the medical science of Lee-Go and ju-jin-heung from the four noted physicians of Geum-Won era. Its characteristics of Taoism, idea of caring of health, and organization affected Dong-Eui-Bo-Kham("東醫寶鑑"). Gong-Jung-Hyun(龔延賢) wrote Man-Byung-Whoi-Choon("萬病回春") using the best part of the theories of Yoo-Wan-So, Jang-Jong-Jung, Lee-Go, Ju-Jin-Heung, this book affected Dong-Eui-Soo-Se-Bo-Won("東醫壽世保元") partly. 6. our medical science was developed from the experience of the treatment of disease obtained from human life, these medical knowledge was arranged and organized in Hyang-Yak-Jib-Sung-Bang("鄕藥集成方"), medical books imported from China was organized in Eui-Bang-Yoo-Chwi("醫方類聚"), which formed the base of medical development in the Chosun dynasty. 7. Eui-Lim-Choal-Yo("醫林撮要") was written by Jung-Kyung-Sun(鄭敬先) and revised by Yang-Yui-Soo(楊禮壽). It was written on the base of Woo-Dan's Eui-Jung-Jun, which compiled the medical science of the four noted physicians of Geum-Won era. It contained confusing theories of the four noted physicians of Geum-Won era and organized medical books of Myung era, therefore it completed the basic form of Byun-Geung-Non-Chi (辨證論治) influenced the writing of Dong-Eui-Bo-Kham("東醫寶鑑"). 8. Dong-Eui-Bo-Kham("東醫寶鑑") was written on the base of basic theory of Eum-Yang-O-Haeng(陰陽五行) and the theory of respondence of heaven and man(天人相應說) in Nae-Kyung. It contained several theories and knowledge, such as the theory of Essence(精), vitalforce(氣), and spirit(神) of Taoism, medical science of geum-won era, our original medical knowledge and experience. It had established the basic organization of our medical science and completed the Byun-Geung-Non-Chi (辨證論治). Dong-Eui-Bo-Kham developed medical science from simple medical treatment to protective medical science by caring of health. And it also discussed human cultivation and Huh-Joon's(許浚) own view of human life through the book. Dong-Eui-Bo-Kham adopted most part of Lee-Go(李杲) and Ju-Jin-Heung's(朱震亨) theory and new theory of "The kidney is the basis of apriority. The spleen is the basis of posterior", so it emphasized the role of spleen and kidney(脾腎) for Jang-Boo-Byung-Gi(臟腑病機). It contained Ju-Jin-Heung's theory of the cause and treatment of disease by colour or fatness of man(black or white, fat or thin). It also contained Ju-Jin-Heung's theory of "phlegm break out fever, fever break out palsy"(痰生熱 熱生風) and the theory of Sang-Wha(相火論). Dong-Eui-Bo-Kham contained Lee-Go's theory of Wha-Yu-Won-Bool-Yang-Lib (火與元氣不兩立論) quoted the theory of Bi-Wi(脾胃論) and the theory of Nae-Oi-Sang-Byun(內外傷辨). For the use of medicine, it followed the theory by Lee-Go. lt used Yoo-Wan-So'S theory of Oh-Gi-Kwa-Keug-Gae-Wi-Yul-Byung(五志過極皆爲熱病) for the treatment of hurt-spirit(傷神) because fever was considered as the cause of disease. It also used Jang-Jons-Jung's theory of Saeng-Keug-Je-Seung(生克制勝) for the treatment of mental disease. 9. Lee-je-ma's Dong-Eui-Soo-Se-Bo-Won("東醫壽世保元") adopted medical theories of Song-Won-Myung era and analyzed these theories using the physical constitutional theory of Sa-Sang-In(四象人). It added Dong-Mu's main idea to complete the theory and clinics of Sa-Sang-Eui-Hak(四象醫學). Lee-Je-Ma didn't quote the four noted physicians of Geum-Won era to discuss that the physical constitutional theory of disease and medicine from Tae-Eum-In(太陰人), So-Yang-In(少陽人), So-Eum-In(少陰人), and Tae-Yang-In(太陽人) was invented from their theories.

  • PDF

중만생 고품질 내도복성 신품종 "종남(孮南)벼" (A New Rice Cultivar with Lodging Tolerance and High Grain Quality "Jongnambyeo")

  • 박노봉;임상종;곽도연;송유천;하운구;오병근;여운상;강종래;이기환;장재기;이점식;남민희;이종희;황흥구;김호영;양세준;김명기;최해춘;김순철;문헌팔;임무상
    • 한국육종학회지
    • /
    • 제41권4호
    • /
    • pp.607-611
    • /
    • 2009
  • "종남벼"는 고품질 안전 다수성 품종을 육성할 목적으로 '91/92년 겨울철에 고품질이면서 단간 내도복 내병성인 밀양 96호에 숙색이 좋고 밥맛이 양호하고 초형이 양호한 YR12734-B-B-22-2를 교배하dUT다. 1992년 여름철에 $F_1$식 물체를 양성한 후 '93 여름에 $F_2$양성하여 개체별로 1립씩 채종후 '93/'94겨울철 세대단축온실에서 $F_5$세대까지 1수 1계통으로 고정시키고 $F_6$세대에서 생육 및 출수 특성 등을 관찰한 뒤 선발하였다. '98년도에 생산력검정시험을 실시하여 이들 중 미질이 좋고 생육특성이 양호한YR15161-B-B-B-57-2-3을 선발하여 밀양 169호의 계통명을 부여하였다. 지역적응시험과 농가실증시험을 실시한 결과 중만생종이면서 준단간으로 내도복성이며 쌀품위가 좋고 내병성이며 밥맛이 양호한 것으로 평가되어 2001년 12월 농작물 직무육성 신품종 선정위원회에서 국가품종목록으로 등재할 것을 결정하고 "종남벼"로 명명하였다. 그 주요특성과 수량성을 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 출수기는 남부평야지의 보통기재배에서 8월 15일로 동진벼보다 2일 빠른 중만생 종이다. 2. 수당립수는 동진벼보다 많으나, 현미천립중은 23.0 gr 동진벼 보다 가벼운 편이다. 3. 내냉성은 동진벼와 비슷하고 내도복성이 양호한 품종이다. 4. 잎도열병 밭못자리 검정 결과 중도저항성을 보였고 흰잎마름병 $K_1$군균에 저항성 이며 바이러스병인 줄무늬잎마름병에는 저항성이나 오갈병과 검은줄오갈병에는 강하지 못하며 주요 충해에 대한 저항성은 없다. 5. 도정특성은 동진벼와 비슷한 수준이며 심복백은 거의 없이 맑으며 동진벼 보다 밥맛이 우수한 고품질 벼 품종이다. 6. 수량성은 남부평야지 및 남서해안지의 보통기 보비재배(5월30일이앙)에서 쌀수량 이 5.60 MT/ha로 동진벼보다 7%, 이모작(6월25일이앙)에서 5.52 MT/ha로 6%, 만 식재배(7월1일이앙)에서도 5.85MT/ha로 7% 증수 되었다. 7. 종남벼는 영남내륙평야지 및 해안지 1모작답에 적응성이 뛰어나며 경남북이 보급대상 지역이다.

만성폐쇄성폐질환 환자에서 Tiotropium 1일 1회, 1회 18㎍ 요법과 Ipratropium 1일 4회, 1회 40㎍ 요법의 치료효과 및 안전성 비교 (A Comparison of Tiotropium 18㎍, Once Daily and Ipratropium 40㎍, 4 Times Daily in a Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Efficacy and Safety Study in Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)

  • 김승준;김명숙;이상학;김영균;문화식;박성학;이상엽;인광호;이창률;김영삼;김형중;안철민;김성규;김경록;차승익;정태훈;김미옥;박성수;최천웅;유지홍;강홍모;고원중;함형석;강은혜;권오정;이양덕;이흥범;이용철;이양근;신원혁;권성연;김우진;이철규;김영환;심영수;한성구;박혜경;김윤성;이민기;박순규;김미혜;리원연;용석중;신계철;최병휘;오연목;임채만;이상도;김우성;김동준;정성수;김주옥;고영춘
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • 제58권5호
    • /
    • pp.498-506
    • /
    • 2005
  • 연구배경 : 본 연구는 COPD환자를 대상으로 기관지확장제인 tiotropium 1일 1회, 1회 1캅셀 $18{\mu}g$과 ipratropium 1일 4회, 1회 2퍼프(퍼프당 $20{\mu}g$)의 유효성 및 안전성을 비교 평가하고자 하였다. 방 법 : 초기 선별방문 후, 환자는 2주간의 관찰기간에 들어갔으며, 이 기간을 마친 환자는 이중맹검, 무작위배정 하에 위약과 함께 1일 1회 tiotropium 또는 1일 4회 ipratropium을 투여 받았다. 유효성평가는 폐기능검사, 일중 PEFR측정, 환자평가 설문조사, 보조치료약물(살부타몰) 사용량으로 하였다. 폐기능검사는 치료시작 시(0일), 치료 14일후와 치료종료 시(28일)에 하였는데, 이때 투약 5분 전, 투약 후 30분, 60분, 120분 및 180분에 시행하였다. 결 과 : 16개 기관에서 134명의 환자가 분석되었다. 환자의 평균 (표준편차) 나이는 66 (7)세이었고 $FEV_1$은 예측치의 42 (12)%였다. 4주 치료 후 trough $FEV_1$ 반응은 ipratropium군에 비해 tiotropium군에서 유의하게 높았으며 PEFR경우에도 4주 동안 지속적으로 아침 흡입 전 측정한 PEFR이 tiotropium군에서 높게 나타났다(차이: 12.52-13.88 l/min). 4주 치료 기간동안 tiotropium은 좋은 내약성과 함께, ipratropium과 유사한 안전성을 나타냈다. 결 론 : 1일 1회 흡입용 항콜린제제인 tiotropium이 1일 4회 흡입용제제인 ipratropium에 비해 COPD환자를 치료하는데 더 우수한 기관지확장 반응을 보여주었고 안전성에서는 유사하였다.