• Title/Summary/Keyword: replicability

Search Result 12, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Punitiveness Toward Defendants Accused of Same-Race Crimes Revisited: Replication in a Different Culture (동인종 범죄로 기소된 피고인에 대한 엄벌주의적 판단의 재고찰: 다른 문화에서의 적용)

  • Lee, Jungwon;Khogali, Mawia;Despodova, Nikoleta M.;Penrod, Steven D.
    • Korean Journal of Forensic Psychology
    • /
    • v.11 no.1
    • /
    • pp.37-61
    • /
    • 2020
  • Lee, Khogali, Despodova, and Penrod (2019) demonstrated that American participants whose races are different from a defendant and a victim rendered more punitive judgments against the defendant in a same-race crime (e.g., White observer-Black defendant-Black victim) compared to a cross-race crime (e.g., White observer-Black defendant-Hispanic victim). The aim of the current study was to test the replicability of their findings in a different country-South Korea. Study 1a failed to replicate the race-combination effect in South Korea with three new moderators-case strength, defendant's use of violence, and race salience. Study 1b was conducted with the same design of Study 1a in the United States to examine whether the failure of the replication in Study 1a was due to cultural differences between South Korea and the United States. However, Study 1b also failed to replicate the race-combination effect. Study 2 conducted a meta-analytic review of the data from Lee et al.'s (2019) study, along with the data from Study 1a and 1b and revealed that the race-salience manipulation in Study 1a and 1b might have caused the null results. We conclude that when people' races are different from both a defendant and a victim, they are likely to render more punitive judgments against the defendant in a same-race crime than a cross-race crime. However, the race-combination effect is only sustained when race-relevant issues are not salient in the crime.

  • PDF

Analysis of Music Rationale and Fidelity in Music Emotion Regulation Studies (국외 음악정서조율 연구의 음악 논거 및 충실도 분석)

  • Chong, Hyun Ju;Kim, Bohyun;Kim, Hyeon Joo
    • Journal of Music and Human Behavior
    • /
    • v.21 no.1
    • /
    • pp.89-113
    • /
    • 2024
  • With increasing interest in the emotional responses to music, research on the regulatory mechanisms of music has been ongoing. This study examines the fidelity of music emotion regulation (MER) studies by analyzing the quality of rationales provided for using music to induce emotional regulation. A total of 45 internationally published studies were collected for review, and analysis was conducted on criteria related to the use of music, including duration, number of pieces, selection rationale, and the selecting agent. Despite the research objectives aiming to investigate the emotional regulation effects of music, it was found that the majority of studies lacked specific information about the music used, and there was weak consistency among the studies. Additionally, reliable evidence for music activities, music selection, and music implementation time was not provided, and there was a lack of logical basis for the regulatory mechanisms of music. The results of this study imply the necessity for fidelity to the rationale of music emotion regulation to establish itself as a research area. Such rigorous fidelity will contribute to increasing the replicability and integrity of research on the therapeutic uniqueness of music.