• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.23 no.1 s.188
• /
• pp.45-60
• /
• 1985

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.19 no.12 s.151
• /
• pp.1031-1038
• /
• 1981

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2003.04a
• /
• pp.85-85
• /
• 2003

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.16 no.8 s.111
• /
• pp.625-630
• /
• 1978

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• v.45 no.4
• /
• pp.199-206
• /
• 2019

Objectives: In mandibular edentulism, the treatment option with a two-interforaminal implant-retained bridge and a removable partial denture is rarely evaluated in literature. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the stress distribution of this treatment option by comparing it with traditional treatment options with interforaminal implants in the edentulous mandible. Materials and Methods: Two interforaminal implants were placed in a formalin-fixed cadaver mandible, and overdentures with three different types of attachments were fabricated: (1) two ball attachments and an overdenture, (2) a Dolder bar and an overdenture, and (3) screw-retained two-implant inter-canine porcelain fused to a metal bridge and an implant-assisted removable denture (IARD) with precision attachments. Three biting conditions were generated for each denture type, and the strains were documented under vertical loading of 100 N. Results: The calculated strain values from measured strains in all measurement sites and loading conditions for the screw-retained two-implant intercanine porcelain fused to a metal bridge and a cast framework partial denture with precision attachments situation were lower than in the other scenarios (P<0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that an IARD may be a reasonable and valuable alternative to ball attachments or a bar in two interforaminal implants, especially when the patients prefer to be able to show their teeth even when they take out their removable dentures.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.53 no.1
• /
• pp.58-65
• /
• 2015

For the rehabilitation of fully edentulous patients, implant-supported removable partial dentures can be considered as one of the treatment options with complete dentures or implant-supported overdentures. If removable partial dentures are used in combination with a small number of implants placed in strategically important positions, it can offer additional stability, retention and support through implants and reduce a burden of surgical procedures compared with fixed implant-supported prostheses with extensive implant placement. Moreover, the economical benefit can be expected as well. The purpose of this case report is to present a treatment in which an implant-supported removable partial denture was fabricated considering residual alveolar bone status and demands after teeth loss in a patient who had been using a distal extension removable partial denture for a long period of time. In anterior area, fixed prostheses were fabricated with implant placement and in posterior area, short implants provide only support for the removable partial denture. In addition, denture base and clasp were made of thermoplastic acrylic resin. Finally, functionally and aesthetically satisfying treatment results can be achieved.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.59 no.3
• /
• pp.359-369
• /
• 2021

Implant prostheses and removable partial dentures are mainly used as treatment methods for partial edentulous patients who have lost a number of teeth. The implant-assisted removable partial denture (IARPD) is strategically selected. The defect in maxillofacial structure due to osteomyelitis, a type of facial bone infection, causes dysfunction such as mastication, swallowing, and pronunciation, as well as social and psychological effects, so a removable restoration is required to restore the supporting tissue. Design of abutment and partial dentures is an essential factor in the success of treatment. In this case, IARPD, which has superior retention and stability compared to traditional removable partial dentures, can have a good prognosis. In a partial edentulous patient with bone defects due to osteomyelitis treatment, the stability of the denture was secured with IARPD restoration. Moreover, maintenance problem that may occur in the future was minimized by providing an appropriate denture design and occlusal scheme through several provisional restorations. This case can be expected to have a favorable prognosis in the long term.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.352-357
• /
• 1993

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the periodontal conditions of distally extending cantilever bridges(CB) and removable patial dentures(RPD). 78 patients treated with removable partial dentures were divided into 2 groups; bilateral free-ending (type 1) and unilateral free-ending(type 2). 43 patients treated with distally extending cantilever bridges were divided into 4 groups according to position of missing molars and number of including abutment tooth (or teeth) (type 1-4). Prosthodontic status of the abutment teeth were assessed; overcontoured crown, overhanged margin, embrasure closure, and others. Their Periodonted status were assessed with Plaque Index Gingial Index(GI) Sulcus bleedy Index (SBI), Tooth mobility(TM) & Posher depth(PPD). 35.9% of RPD group and 38.1 of CB grouphad disconfort on mastication with prosthetics. 16.7% of RPD group and 6.1% of CB group showed on opposing sites. Overhanged margins were 58.3% for RPD group and 86.6% for GB group. 45.5% of RPD group and 72% of CB group had embrasure closure on the abutment teeth. 30.5% of GB group had oversized pontic. Gb group showed much higher clinical parameters than RPD groups, but statistically not significant. Type 2 of RPD group showed lower GI and SBI, but statistically not significant. Type 3 of CB group showed the highest GI and SBI and type 2 showed the highest tooth mobility, but there is no differences between the same type of groups. In conclusion, only minor differences in periodontal conditions were recorded in RPD and CB group.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.7-16
• /
• 1981

The technology of precision attachments has developed at such a pace that from a very few T-shaped attachments and bar attachments from the years 1915 to 1935 since removable bridge utilizing a T-shaped intracoronal attachment was constructed by Dr. Herman E.S. Chayes in 1906. There are now more than 120 models of the most diversified designs, ready made or laboratory fashioned. In 1971, 126 attachments were listed and classified by Mensor in his E M Attachment Selector. This selector consists of five charts giving specifications as to type, vertical dimensions, application, type of resilience, size of movement, type of retention and type of material and alloy. Thus the E M Attachment Selector is a useful guide for dentists to choose the attachment for his patients. But dentists should apply the attachment in each patient's case according to an accurate diagnosis and treatment plan. This paper is a case report of removable partial dentures utilizing CSP, PD and Bar attachment on a patient who needed full mouth reconstruction. Patient has right first, second molar and left first molar on the upper arch and also left first molar, first premolar and right canine on the lower arch. (Fig. 5)All remaining teeth are relatively healthy in their supporting tissues. On upper arch, ring shape CSP attachment was designed on left first molar and modified ring shape CSP attachment was designed on right first and second molar as the direct retainer of the removable partial denture. Full palatal coverage was used as the major connector in this case. (Fig. 23) On lower arch, author first splinted with a fixed bridge between left first molar and second premolar and a splint bar between left second premolar and right canine. (Fig. 11) A lower removable partial denture in which was designed with an Aker clasp on the left first molar and a PD attachment on .the right canine was constructed. (Fig. 17) This denture could get additional support from anterior splint bar. After both removable partial dentures were delivered to the patient (Fig. 26), author evaluated function of the dentures and supporting structures of the abutment teeth by means of clinical and X-ray examinations for eighteen months. According to the examination data author came to the conclusion that the prognosis of this case was excellent.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.66-71
• /
• 1976

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the mouth preparation and design of removable partial dentures. A total of 187cases for the prefabricated partial denture frameworks in both maxillary and mandibular semi-dentulous situations (66 cases and 203 cases) was selected from this study. The evaluations of mouth preparation and design observed here involved the classification of edentulous spaces, status of abutment splinting with location, design of direct retainer and structure of maxillary major connector according to the incidence of both dental arches, ages, sexes and segment of semidentulousness. The analyzed results were as follows: 1) The order of frequency rate in removable partial denture construction was Class II (50.27%), Class I (36. 90%), Class III (10.69%), and Class IV (2.14 %). 2) The distribution on design of maxillary removable partial denture prosthesis was 33.22% and 64.11% in mandibular removable partial denture prosthesis. 3) The age distribution of removable partial denture prosthesis was prominent after40 years (41.71%). 4) The design pattern of maxillary major connectors was in order of anteroposterior bar, single palatal bar, palatal strap, U-shape connector. 5) The design pattern of direct retainer was in order of Aker's clasp, I-bar clasp, backaction clasp, cuspid universal clasp. 6) The abutment for partial denture clasp splinted between premolar and premolar and its frequency rate revealed 53.44%. 7) It seemed that the location and design of the indirect retainer showed accepatble limit.