• Title/Summary/Keyword: quantifiers

Search Result 33, Processing Time 0.025 seconds

Quantifiers in Questions

  • Krifka, Manfred
    • Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics
    • /
    • v.3 no.4
    • /
    • pp.499-526
    • /
    • 2003
  • This paper, based on Krifka (2001), is about the interpretation of quantifiers in questions. I have argued that quantification into question acts is possible for universal quantifiers, as these quantifiers are based on conjunction, an operation that is defined for speech acts. This explains the restriction to universal quantifiers, which are generalized conjunctions. I have developed a type system in which quantification into question acts can be described. I have argued that expressions that scope out of speech acts must be topic, which explains a number of additional observations. I have also discussed embedded questions, which, depending on the embedding verb, may allow for quantification into questions.

  • PDF

A note on Linguistic quantifiers modeled by Sugeno integral with respect to an interval-valued fuzzy measures (구간치 퍼지측도와 관련된 수게노적분에 의해 모델화된 언어 정량자에 관한 연구)

  • Jang, Lee-Chae;Kim, Tae-Kyun;Kim, Hyun-Mee
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems
    • /
    • v.20 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-6
    • /
    • 2010
  • Ying[M.S. Ying, Linguistic quantifiers modeled by Sugeno integrals, Artificial Intelligence 170(2006) 581-606] studied a framework for modeling quantifiers in natural languages in which each linguistic quantifier is represented by a family of fuzzy measures and the truth value of a quantified proposition is evaluated by using Sugeno integral. In this paper, we consider interval-valued fuzzy measures and interval quantifiers which are the generalized concepts of fuzzy measures and quantifiers, respectively. We also investigate logical properties of a first order language with interval quantifiers modeled by the Sugeno integral with respect to an interval-valued fuzzy measures.

Floating Quantifiers as Overt Scope Markers

  • Tsoulas, George
    • Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics
    • /
    • v.3 no.2
    • /
    • pp.157-180
    • /
    • 2003
  • Why should quantifiers float\ulcorner This is the question that this paper sets out to answer. In the past, research concentrated on how the theory should account for the non-constituency of a quantificational determiner and the NP it quantifies over. Successful as they might have been, those theories have little, if anything to offer as an answer to the question why quantifiers would float. Here we sketch a theory that puts the scopal properties of FQs (already observed by Dowty and Brodie, 1984) in the center of their properties. We construct a theory in which FQs are simple scope markers and float when differential scope needs to be marked.

  • PDF

A 4-step Inference Method for Natural Language Propositions Involving Fuzzy Quantifiers and Truth Qualifiers

  • Okamoto, Wataru
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems Conference
    • /
    • 2003.09a
    • /
    • pp.579-582
    • /
    • 2003
  • In this paper, we propose a 4-step inference method needed for constructing a natural language communication system. The method is used to obtain fuzzy quantifier Q′when QA is Fisr τ⇔ Q′(m′A) is mF is m"is τ is inferred (Q, Q′: quantifiers, A: fuzzy subject, m′, m": modifiers, y: fuzzy predicate, τ: truth qualifier). We show that Q′is resolved step by step for two types of Q, including a non-increasing type (few,...) and a non-decreasing type(most,...).

  • PDF

A Focus-Based Approach to Scope Ambiguity in Japanese

  • Okabe, Ryoya
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society for Language and Information Conference
    • /
    • 2002.02a
    • /
    • pp.370-382
    • /
    • 2002
  • This paper puts forward an analysis of scope interactions between Japanese adverbial quantifiers like mainichi 'everyday'and tokidoki 'sometimes'and a negative morpheme nai 'not'on the basis of f(ocus)-structures. In this analysis, three f-structures are assigned to a sentence with an adverbial quantifier and a negative morpheme. One of them represents a negation-wide reading, and the other two represent quantifier-wide readings. Some f-structures, however, are unacceptable due to semantic or pragmatic factors. Different scope behaviors of the two quantifiers mentioned above can then be ascribed to acceptability of f-structures.

  • PDF

English Floating Quantifiers and Lexical specification of Quantifier Retrieval

  • Yoo, Eun-Jung
    • Language and Information
    • /
    • v.5 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-15
    • /
    • 2001
  • Floating quantifiers(FQs) in English exhibit both universal and language specific proper- ties This paper discusses how such syntactic and semantic characteristics can be explained in terms of a constraint-based, lexical approach to the floating quanti- fer construction within the framework of Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar(HPSG). Based on the assumption and FQs are base-generated VP modifiers, this paper proposes and account in which the semantic contribution of FQs consists of a "lexically retrieved" universal quantifier taking scope over the VP meaning.P meaning.

  • PDF