• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.238-243
• /
• 2012

Background : The publication rate of presentations at medical international meetings has ranged from 11% to 78% with an average of 45%. To date, there are no studies about the final rate of publications at scientific meetings associated with plastic surgery from Korea. The present authors investigated the publication rate among the presentations at meetings associated with plastic surgery. Methods : The titles and authors of the abstracts from oral and poster presentations were collected from the program books of the Congress of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (CKSPRS) for 2005 to 2007 (58th-63rd). All of the abstracts presented were searched for using PubMed, KoreaMed, KMbase, and Google Scholar. The titles, key words from the titles, and the authors' names were then entered in database programs. The parameters reviewed included the publication rate, type of presentation including running time, affiliation, subspecialty, time to publication, and publication journal. Results : A total of 1,176 abstracts presented at the CKSPRS from 2005 to 2007 were evaluated. 38.7% of the abstracts, of which oral presentations accounted for 41.0% and poster presentations 34.8%, were published as full papers. The mean time to publication was 15.04 months. Among journals of publication, the Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons was most used. Conclusions : Brilliant ideas and innovative approaches are being discussed at CKSPRS. The 38.7% publication rate found from this research appeared a bit lower than the average rate of medical meetings. If these valuable presentations are not available as full papers, the research would be a waste of time and effort.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.101-112
• /
• 2024

Purpose: The study aimed to examine doctoral students' degree acquisition paths and postgraduate research achievements and explore whether there are differences in the research achievements of doctoral degree holders in relation to the dissertation format. Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study of nursing doctoral graduates whose degree conferral dates were between August 2013 and August 2023 that compared two dissertation tracks: traditional and publication. We evaluated the proportion of graduates in each track, publication of their dissertations, time to graduation, and the number of peer-reviewed journal publications after graduation. Results: Of the sample, 160 (87.4%) graduated in the traditional track, with only 56 (35.0%) of them publishing their dissertations after graduation. Excluding dissertations, 114 of the graduates (71.3%) published first-authored articles in the traditional track, while 12 (52.2%) did so in the publication track. The time to graduation was significantly shorter in the traditional track, with an average of 5.47±2.45 years, compared to 6.61±2.57 years in the publication track (z=2.26, p=.023). In the traditional track, 64 of graduates (40.0%) majored in adult health nursing, whereas in the publication track, 8 (34.8%) studied community health nursing. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the significance of the publication track for nursing doctoral dissertations in terms of research dissemination. Despite its numerous advantages, it is not yet the preferred choice for both students and faculty. Maintaining the publication track as an additional graduation option is worthwhile, as it allows students to gain research publishing experience before graduation and to effectively disseminate scientific findings in nursing.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.27-41
• /
• 2013

We investigated how bibliometric indicators such as publication count and citation count affect the assessment of research performance by computing various bibliometric scores of the works of Korean LIS faculty members and comparing the rankings by those scores. For the study data, we used the publication and citation data of 159 tenure-track faculty members of Library and Information Science departments in 34 Korean universities. The study results showed correlation between publication count and citation count for authors with many publications but the opposite evidence for authors with few publications. The study results suggest that as authors publish more and more work, citations to their work tend to increase along with publication count. However, for junior faculty members who have not yet accumulated enough publications, citations to their work are of great importance in assessing their research performance. The study data also showed that there are marked differences in the magnitude of citations between papers published in Korean journals and papers published in international journals.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.56-75
• /
• 2021

We introduce a new research assessment measure, called the research excellence index. The measure, which we denote by RE-index, accurately assesses the research performance of a researcher. The methodology used in deriving the RE-index tackles many of the flaws of popular research performance indicators such as publication counts, citation counts, and the h and g indices. A dataset is introduced, which takes advantage of the wide coverage of Scopus and the Library of Congress, and, at the same time, deals with the Scopus database depth problem. For an academic publication x, a prestige-type and length scores are assigned, and if x is published in an academic periodical publication J, the stature of J is identified through a quartile score. The three scores are used to assign a value score to every academic publication, and cited academic publications are given citation scores that encompass both cases of including and excluding self-citations. The foregoing scores are used to derive another set of scores measuring the combined qualitative and quantitative aspects of the creative work, citations of creative work, informative work and citations of informative work of a researcher. The scores take into consideration co-authorship. From these scores, two versions of the RE-index for a researcher are derived, covering the cases of including and excluding self-citations. The new measure is calculated for two mathematicians.

• 연구윤리
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.19-25
• /
• 2023

Purpose: This research article aim is to critically examine the ethical principles that govern research publication in social sciences and to identify and analyze the everyday ethical challenges social science researchers face during the publication process. Also, the research explores the factors contributing to ethical violations in social science research publication. Research design, data, and methodology: The present research has conducted comprehensive literature analysis and the authors of this research has figured out total 24 significant prior studies in the current literature dataset for the literature review and finding section. The procedure of data obtaining included the elimination process to screen dissertation papers, conference papers, and internet sources. Results: Previous The sociologies, given their emphasis on the human way of behaving and interactions, demand heightened ethical considerations due to the potential impact of research findings on individuals and society. Therefore, understanding and upholding ethical standards are essential for researchers at all career stages. Conclusions: In order to retain the integrity, legitimacy, and societal influence of research findings, ethical issues are crucial and the necessity for flexible and comprehensive ethical frameworks is highlighted by the rapid evolution of research methodology, digital platforms, and interdisciplinary collaborations, adding new dimensions of ethical complexity.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제52권3호
• /
• pp.217-238
• /
• 2021

이 연구는 현행의 목록규칙에서 판과 쇄차표시, 발행년 표시 등의 서지요소를 기술하는 문제점을 파악해보고, 한국목록규칙과 한국문헌자동화목록형식의 개선안을 제시하는 것이 목적이다. 도서관에서 정보기술 환경의 변화에 따라, 이용자에게 제공할 수 있는 목록의 수준과 범위를 조정해야 할 것이다. 자료가 다양해지고, 메타데이터의 기술방식이 발전함에 따라 서지요소의 개발과 기술방식의 변경이 기존 표준화의 틀을 바꾸고 있다. 연구방법으로 판과 쇄의 용어 개념을 살펴보고, 우리나라의 기존 목록규칙을 대상으로 이 표기에 대한 변천과정을 살펴보며, KCR4를 중심으로 목록 예시를 통해 추가하거나 수정해야할 서지기술 방법을 제시하고, 이를 KORMARC 작성에 반영하는 형식을 살펴보고자 한다. 여기에서는 단행본 도서의 기술형식으로만 한정하고자 한다. 도서관목록의 서지기술요소는 기술대상자료의 서지요소와 완전히 일치해야 한다. 이에 목록규칙의 개선(안)은 먼저, 목록규칙의 판사항에 판표시와 쇄차표시를 기술하도록 한다. 그리고 발행년의 기술은 해당 판의 최초발행년 기술이 아니라 최신발행년을 기술하게 한다. 발행년의 기술범위는 발행월까지 확대한다. 둘째, KORMARC형식에서 판사항에서 쇄차표시는 250필드 식별기호에 부여하며, 쇄차표시는 2쇄부터 숫자로 기술한다. 발행년월의 표시는 260필드의 한 식별기호에는 발행년을 적고 다른 식별기호에는 발행월을 기술한다. 발행년월은 해당출판물의 표제면과 판권기에 실려있는 최신년월이 기술된다.

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.1-27
• /
• 2018

국내외 기록물관리기관에서는 기록정보의 이용을 확대하고자 전시, 교육 및 출판 등 다양한 형태의 확장서비스를 제공한다. 그 중 출판프로그램은 휴대성이 좋고 서비스 범위가 넓기 때문에 기록관의 기능을 알리는 홍보 효과가 뛰어나다. 또 소장 기록물의 검색도구, 역사적 가치가 있는 자료, 기록관리 업무 매뉴얼, 기록관 이용 안내 등 다양하고 유익한 정보를 이용자에게 효과적으로 전달할 수 있는 장점이 있어, 이에 대해 좀 더 면밀히 살펴볼 필요가 있다. 이 연구에서는 미국 NARA와 국내의 국가기록원의 출판프로그램 현황과 발간되고 있는 출판물의 유형을 조사하고, 출판 담당 조직 및 출판 과정 등을 자세히 비교 분석하였다. 여기에서 얻은 시사점을 기반으로 하여 국가기록원에서 진행되고 있는 출판프로그램의 한계점을 분석하고, 기록관리기관에서 앞으로 출판프로그램 운영 시 고려해야할 점들을 제안하였다.

• 대한한의학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.103-110
• /
• 2017

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine trends in duplicate publication in Korean medical articles indexed in the Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System(OASIS). Methods: We searched the list of papers published in Korean medical journals by using OASIS. We randomly extracted 10% of total articles (n=1,162). We searched using OASIS by entering keywords from the title and names of the first and last authors of each indexed article. After the librarian selected the candidates of duplicate publication, three authors reviewed the full texts of the articles independently. When their opinions were not in agreement, reconciliation was made by discussion. The patterns of duplicate publication, such as copy, salami slicing (fragmentation), and aggregation (imalas), were also determined. Results: A total of 1162 articles were evaluated, 24 (2.1%) index articles of which were duplicate articles. Among 24 index articles, Two were triple publications and 22 were double publications. The patterns of duplication publication were as follows; (1) copy (n=8, 33.3%); (2) salami (9, 37.5%), (3) imalas (5, 20.8%) (4) others (2, 8.3%). Conclusion: Duplicate publications have appeared in Korean medical journals in a small proportion. Education on publication ethics and authors'ethical awareness is needed.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.34-41
• /
• 2007

프레즌스(presence) 서비스는 사용자들에 관한 각종 프레즌스 정보를 등록(subscription)과 통지(notification)를 통해 제공하는 SIP(session initiation protocol) 확장 서비스 중 하나로서 VoIP(Voice over IP)나 인스턴트 메시징 서비스 등에서 중요하게 사용되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 프레즌스 서비스를 구현함에 있어 사용자가 다양한 방식으로 프레즌스 서비스와 호 처리 서비스를 조합하여 제어할 수 있도록 호 처리 언어를 확장하고, publication 시 프레즌스 정보에 변화가 있을 경우에는 전체 내용 대신 변화된 부분만 전송하는 새로운 방식을 제안하였다. 본 방식에서는 사용자는 최초 publication 시 전체 프레즌스 정보 및 자신이 원하는 내용을 기술한 호 처리 언어 스크립트를 프레즌스 서버에 등록하며, 서버는 와처(watcher)로 부터의 등록과 통지 시 이를 실행하여 프레즌스 서비스와 호 처리를 조합한 다양한 서비스를 제공할 수 있게 된다. 또한, 사용자는 이후 publication 시 프레즌스 정보의 변화된 부분만 전송하고, 프레즌스 서버도 프레즌스 정보의 통지 시 변화된 부분만 와처에게 전송하도록 하여 전체적인 시스템 효율을 높일 수 있다. 제안된 방식은 실험을 통하여 성능을 측정하였다.

• 연구윤리
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.21-24
• /
• 2021

Purpose: This paper aims to evaluate and reinstate preventative guidelines necessary for a sound academic journal (or academic conference) for the articles published by KODISA and its branch journals. As questionable or predatory academic journals and academic conferences are rapidly increasing, preemptively establishing preventative standards have become essential to obviate questionable academic activities. Research design, data and methodology: This is an analytical study that explores and examines research, publication ethics, and misconducts. For this purpose, research ethics related data in overseas and domestic academic journals have been examined and analyzed. Results: The issues identified from this research are as follows: enhancing the expertise of editor-inchief (no concurrent jobs for major and non-major area); clarifying the index; complying with the review policy (The review policy should be publicly announced); complying with anonymous review process; complying with 3 peer-review policy, complying with the publication policy as per field of study; avoiding conference hosting at holiday resorts unless unavoidable; complying with the planned programs and cancelling events if not feasible; following proper review standards and management for all journals, including the journals publishing large number of articles (all materials should be prepared in case explanatory data is required); complying with the marketing policy standards; complying with the impact factor; excluding personal solicitation; and complying with the general policy. Conclusions: Questionable and predatory academic activities by academic organizations and journals will continue, and it is the responsibility of the individual scholars to identify and reject these types of dubious academic activities. This study provides standards to prevent the possibility of questionable academic activities that have been conducted in the past. The analysis and findings will strengthen the continued efforts of KODISA as it strives to be a transparent, ethical, and professional academic association, and the association will continue to foster an academic environment that is well-respected by scholars and practitioners throughout the world.