DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of nursing doctoral dissertation formats over a decade: A comparative research between traditional and publication format at a university

간호학 박사학위논문 제도의 출판 형식 도입 10년 현황 분석: 일 대학 학위과정의 전통 형식과 출판 형식의 비교

  • Choi, Subin (College of Nursing, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Jee-Eun (College of Nursing, Seoul National University) ;
  • Woo, Kyungmi (Center for World-leading Human-care Nurse Leaders for the Future by Brain Korea 21 (BK 21) four project College of Nursing, Seoul National University)
  • 최수빈 (서울대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 박지은 (서울대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 우경미 (BK21 세계선도 휴먼케어 간호인재 교육연구단)
  • Received : 2024.01.09
  • Accepted : 2024.02.19
  • Published : 2024.05.31

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to examine doctoral students' degree acquisition paths and postgraduate research achievements and explore whether there are differences in the research achievements of doctoral degree holders in relation to the dissertation format. Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study of nursing doctoral graduates whose degree conferral dates were between August 2013 and August 2023 that compared two dissertation tracks: traditional and publication. We evaluated the proportion of graduates in each track, publication of their dissertations, time to graduation, and the number of peer-reviewed journal publications after graduation. Results: Of the sample, 160 (87.4%) graduated in the traditional track, with only 56 (35.0%) of them publishing their dissertations after graduation. Excluding dissertations, 114 of the graduates (71.3%) published first-authored articles in the traditional track, while 12 (52.2%) did so in the publication track. The time to graduation was significantly shorter in the traditional track, with an average of 5.47±2.45 years, compared to 6.61±2.57 years in the publication track (z=2.26, p=.023). In the traditional track, 64 of graduates (40.0%) majored in adult health nursing, whereas in the publication track, 8 (34.8%) studied community health nursing. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the significance of the publication track for nursing doctoral dissertations in terms of research dissemination. Despite its numerous advantages, it is not yet the preferred choice for both students and faculty. Maintaining the publication track as an additional graduation option is worthwhile, as it allows students to gain research publishing experience before graduation and to effectively disseminate scientific findings in nursing.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the BK21 four project (Center for World-leading Human-Care Nurse Leaders for the Future) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE, Korea) and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF).

References

  1. Enforcement decree of the higher education act. Article 44: Presentation and examination of dissertations [Internet]. Korea Legislation Research Institute; 2009 [cited 2023 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=249917&chrClsCd=010203&urlMode=engLsInfoR&viewCls=engLsInfoR#0000
  2. Oh K, Park YS, Lee JH, Oh KO, Ahn YH, Lim J. A historical trends of doctoral nursing education in Korea. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2014;20(1):93-107. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2014.20.1.93
  3. Swank JM, Weaver JL, DePue K. Manuscript-style dissertations: An alternative to the traditional dissertation style. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision. 2021;14(4):14.
  4. Francis K, Mills J, Chapman Y, Birks M. Doctoral dissertations by publication: Building scholarly capacity whilst advancing new knowledge in the discipline of nursing. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. 2009;4:97-106. https://doi.org/10.28945/695
  5. Evans SC, Amaro CM, Herbert R, Blossom JB, Roberts MC. "Are you gonna publish that?" Peer-reviewed publication outcomes of doctoral dissertations in psychology. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192219. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192219
  6. Smaldone A, Heitkemper E, Jackman K, Joanne Woo K, Kelson J. Dissemination of PhD dissertation research by dissertation format: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2019;51(5):599-607. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12504
  7. Thomas RA, West RE, Rich P. Benefits, challenges, and perceptions of the multiple article dissertation format in instructional technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2016;32(2):82-98. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2573
  8. Russell GM, Alison PC, Frances DH, Roy AK, Francis LL, Gordon M, et al. The role and nature of the doctoral dissertation. Council of Graduate Schools in the U.S.; 1991. p. 1-49.
  9. Bragonier WH, Spragg SDS, Whitehead WD, Cobb JE. The doctor of philosophy degree: A policy statement. Council of Graduate Schools in the U.S.; 2005. p. 1-36.
  10. Robinson S, Dracup K. Innovative options for the doctoral dissertation in nursing. Nursing Outlook. 2008;56(4):174-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2008.03.004
  11. De Jong MJ, Moser DK, Hall LA. The manuscript option dissertation: Multiple perspectives. Nurse Author & Editor. 2005;15(3):3-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4910.2005.tb00554.x
  12. Anderson T, Saunders G, Alexander I. Alternative dissertation formats in education-based doctorates. Higher Education Research & Development. 2022;41(3):593-612. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1867513
  13. Graves JM, Postma J, Katz JR, Kehoe L, Swalling E, Barbosa-Leiker C. A national survey examining manuscript dissertation formats among nursing PhD programs in the United States. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2018;50(3): 314-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12374
  14. Garg KC. Publication delay of manuscripts in periodicals published by CSIR-NISCAIR. Current Science. 2016;111(12): 1924-1928.
  15. Amat C. Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting. Scientometrics. 2008;74(3):379-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1823-8
  16. Fernandez-Llimos F. Peer review and publication delay. Pharmacy Practice (Granada). 2019;17(1):1502. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2019.1.1502
  17. Zabala J, Gonzalez-Albo B, Garcia-Garcia A, Garrido-Dominguez A, Vidal-Liy JI, Alvarez-Diez LR, et al. Evaluation and publication delay in Ibero-American scientific journals. Learned Publishing. 2023;36(2):205-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1497
  18. Pautasso M, Schafer H. Peer review delay and selectivity in ecology journals. Scientometrics. 2010;84(3):307-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0105-z
  19. Smith J. Online firsts: Will help to reduce delays in publication of research findings. BMJ. 2003;327(7427):1302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1302
  20. Palese A, Coletti S, Dante A. Publication efficiency among the higher impact factor nursing journals in 2009: A retrospective analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2013;50(4):543-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.08.019
  21. Harrison Dening K. Dementia: Recognition and cognitive testing in community and primary care settings. British Journal of Community Nursing. 2023;28(7):332-336. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2023.28.7.332
  22. Tothova V, Bartlova S, Sedova L, Treslova M, Chloubova I, Proskova E. The nurse's role in preventive care in the field of community nursing. Neuro Endocrinology Letters. 2014;35 Suppl 1:26-33.
  23. Garcia-Martinez P, Lozano-Vidal R, Herraiz-Ortiz MDC, Collado-Boira E. Skills acquired in research and public health in the specialty of family and community nursing in the Valencian Community. Enfermeria Clinica. 2017;27(5):303-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2017.07.007
  24. Chisholm LJ, Hale RL, Knight SL. Community resilience after hurricanes: Can Neuman's systems theory guide public health nursing? Research and Theory for Nursing Practice. 2023;37(1):84-100. https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2022-0029
  25. Green J, Doyle C, Hayes S, Newnham W, Hill S, Zeller I, et al. COVID-19 and district and community nursing. British Journal of Community Nursing. 2020;25(5):213. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2020.25.5.213