• 농촌계획
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.77-82
• /
• 2006

The objective of public works planning is being converted from economic growth to sustainable development. So, the demand for considering social & ecological influences as well as economic components had been increased in evaluation of public works planning. In evaluation of public works, its components related with benefit and cost in feasibility analysis can be classified to qualitative and qualitative elements. Qualitative elements are evaluated by qualitative methods which can manage various items, be commonly applied nationwide, and consider elements that can be calculated numerically such as environments, willingness, etc. In this study, using the concept of 'Information measure', a method to design planning of rural works is proposed. 'Information benefit model' for rural works can evaluate present plan in the side of provider's and demander's 'benefit'. And, optimizing method of rural works by 'Information benefit' can simulate present state and optimize the site and route of rural works.

• 한국ITS학회 논문지
• /
• 제16권6호
• /
• pp.169-181
• /
• 2017

자동차 보급률이 증가함에 따라 교통 혼잡과 관련된 문제가 대두되고 있으며 선진국을 중심으로 카풀 등의 공유교통이 주요 관심사로 떠오르고 있다. 본 연구에서는 혁신도시 이전공공기관의 기관 내 종사자를 대상으로 중 장거리 출 퇴근 시에 카풀을 도입할 경우에 발생하는 편익을 분석하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 이전공공기관의 카풀 이용 수요를 추정하고 교통류 모형을 이용하여 카풀을 도입함에 따라 감소하는 교통량에 따른 통행속도를 추정하였다. 편익은 직접편익과 간접편익으로 구분하였으며 분석결과, 직접편익과 간접편익은 연간 약 230억 원, 565억 원의 편익이 발생하는 것으로 나타나 향후 장래 교통수요관리를 위한 카풀 도입의 기초연구로 활용할 수 있을 것이라 기대된다.

• 한국지역지리학회지
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.79-94
• /
• 1998

90년대에 들어서 국내에서는 많은 지리정보 사업이 실행되고 있다. 바로 이 시점이 지리정보 사업의 여러 가지 기술개발과 적용, 지리정보 사업의 공공 정책적 접근방법 및 연구가 필요한 시점이라고 본다. 본 연구는 공공기관에서 시행되는 지리정보 사업에 대한 정책적 중요성을 검토하고 정책 분석적 측면에서 사업은 어떻게 평가되어야 하며, 어떤 내용들이 어떠한 절차와 단계를 거쳐 검토되어야 하는가를 연구한 것이다. 이러한 정가와 분석을 위해서 '비용편익 분석'을 하나의 분석방법으로 제시하면서, 이 방법이 지리정보 사업을 평가하는데 어떠한 장정과 단점을 갖는지를 연구했다. 주요 이점은 자료 분석의 용이, 지도 출력 및 수정 변경의 비용 절감 등이 유형의 이점으로 볼 수 있는 반면, 저리정보의 질적 향상과 보다 정확한 지리정보의 관리 및 운영, 의사결정지원 등이 무형의 이점으로 나타났다. 그러나 이러한 이점들은 지리정보 사업 시행 이전의 비용편익 분석에서 효과적으로 분석될 수 있는 부문이 있는 반면, 무형의 이점들은 여전히 비용 편익 개념에서 제대로 파악될 수 없는 경우가 있다. 이러한 문제점들은 향후 연구 과제로써 일반적인 계량적 평가 방법과 아울러 질적인 무형의 이점까지도 평가할 수 있는 다양한 분석 방법 및 평가 수단의 계속적인 연구가 필요하다.

• 한국직업건강간호학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.99-109
• /
• 2003

Although occupational accidents caused by presses are found to be the highest in manufacturing industrial groups, there are no study regarding to annulment for periodical inspection of press. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the economic benefit of periodical inspection of press for preventing accidents. The cost-benefit analysis in this study was conducted to evaluate the relative magnitude of benefit to cost. Study samples were 26 and years analysed were 1995, 1996, 1998 and 1999. Personal interviews with safety managers were held from October 7 to November 2, 2002. Costs of the periodical inspection program were compared with the benefit of accident that caused by presses. Costs and benefits were calculated at an discount rate of 5%. The benefit-cost ratio was 5.7. The sensitivity analysis for the discount rate, the number of press, and size of industry showed that every benefit-cost ratios were upper than one(1.0). The results of this study suggested that periodical inspection for press is important program for preventing accident and the regulation for periodical inspection program should be reenforced by government.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제55권12호
• /
• pp.4617-4627
• /
• 2023

Public perception of benefit over risk is the de facto factor in planning, construction, operation, halting, or phase-out of a nuclear power plant in any country. Even if there are multiple pathways of perceiving risk/benefit among different stakeholders, the perception of nuclear and non-nuclear groups needs to be individually tracked to help understand sectoral influence. Related studies were basically performed between the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) and non-STEM groups. However, there are no such studies between the nuclear and non-nuclear groups. This study investigated the risk-benefit perceptions between the nuclear group (N = 102) and the non-nuclear group (N = 467) using survey data to measure their stake and identify the underlying factors by validating the hypotheses, through descriptive analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). Results showed that risk perception is significantly high in the non-nuclear group (as the P-value is > 0.001 to <0.01) while the benefit perception is slightly low in the nuclear group (as the P-value is > 0.01 to <0.05). The non-nuclear group was significantly influenced by risk perception due to a lack of involvement in nuclear activities. Notably, the nuclear group is less interactive in disseminating nuclear energy benefits to the non-nuclear group. Surprisingly, misperceptions and lack of confidence about the benefits of nuclear energy also exist in the nuclear group. The study emphasizes debunking nuclear myths in the nuclear and non-nuclear groups through meaningful interactions and demands effective public awareness-building programs by competent authorities for the growth of the nuclear industry.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.467-496
• /
• 2012

Public participation in the decision making for scarce health resources is important because health policy requires trust based consensus, which can be achieved by public's understanding and involvement of related policies. In the past, opportunities for interaction between health policy decision makers and lay public were rare in Korea. As political impulses towards public participation in health policy have increased, a few of deliberation methods were attempted. However, there is little research, reporting such cases with a critical examination of relevant theories and previous studies. We first critically review the literature on public participation within theories of democracy, governance, and empowerment. Next, we report a case of a citizen council experiment, which was held to examine public's preferences among different benefit options regarding new drugs and medical technologies. Specifically, in an one-day long citizen council with a total of 28 lay public, twelve questions of whether a drug or a technology should be included in the benefit package of health insurance were asked. Pre- and post-surveys investigated participants' perception of public engagement in health policy. Although it was experimental, the citizen council ensured that lay public could be careful enough to rationally compare the costs and benefits of different options and collectively make decisions. Further, results from pre- and post-survey showed a strong willingness of members to be involved in health care decision making. In the conclusion, we emphasize that better theories and methods need to be developed for more cases of citizen participation in health care policy and management.

• Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.97-108
• /
• 2005

This study is to estimate differences, relationships and related factors of environmental risk perception and perceived benefit among residents and workers. A self-administered questionnaire survey using a structured instrument was carried out to residents and workers in industrial area during April, 2002. Total number of participants were 657 including 329 residents and 328 workers. Participants assessed environmental risk perception, self- assessed knowledge, trust in authorities and perceived benefit associated with 10 products manufactured in industrial area. There were difference in environmental risk perception, knowledge and trust in authorities and perceived benefit among residents and workers. Especially, trust in authorities and perceived benefit were statistically significant difference among residents and workers. Inverse relationships between environmental risk perception and perceived benefit have been observed for different products. In other words, the greater the perceived benefit, the lower the perceived risk, and vice versa. Factors mostly associated with participant's characteristics of environmental risk perception were age. marriage status (workers), education level (workers). There was statistically significant difference. Perceived benefit was statistically significant difference with sex, marriage status, residence duration, education level (workers). Related factors of environmental risk perception among residents and workers were age, trust in authorities. And factors affecting the perceived benefit were sex, age, education level (workers), and trust in authorities (workers). According to the results, people having high trust in the authorities perceived less risks than people having low in the authorities. To improve the communication of risk information, further study focus on assessment of experts, government and stakeholder in industrial area. Methodologies of this study can be used as the basis for investigating the structure of public perception of environmental products risks and benefit, designing a public information and risk communication program, and developing policy actions to improve acceptance.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.491-516
• /
• 2004

본 연구는 공공도서관 건립 타당성조사보고서에 있어서 경제적 타당성 접근방법과 정책적, 기술적 타당성 접근방법을 비교$\cdot$분석하고 문제점을 구명하였다. 경제적 타당성 분석에서 사용된 비용편익분석은 편익추정과 할인율 적용에 문제가 있는 것으로 나타났으며 정책적, 기술적 타당성 분석은 건립이 확정된 사업을 합리화하는 수단으로 잘못 활용될 수 있는 문제가 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 공공도서관 건립을 계획중인 관련기관에서 타당성조사를 준비하는데 유용한 자료가 될 것으로 기대한다.

• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제46권
• /
• pp.7-36
• /
• 2001

The current benefit expenditure of National Pension Scheme is comparatively small, as it stands in the early stage in reference to the historical development. On the other hand, the current contribution rate of National Pension is set up beyond which is sufficient to cover the current benefit expenditure. Therefore, National Pension makes big surplus every year such that the size of accumulated fund increases very fast. Nevertheless, the apprehension of financial instability of National Pension prevails these days. If so, is it really well-grounded? In terms of the method of financing. public pension schemes of most of all nations in the world are based on pay-as you go or partial funding. Under these financing methods, financial soundness fundamentally depends on the power that the government is able to impose the burden which is equivalent to benefit expenditure and the attitude of the public which represents whether they will admit it or not. Under this perspective, the judgement of financial soundness of public pension can not be made arithmetically and technically only on the basis of the balance between receipts and expenditure but should be accomplished considering the very complex and diverse aspects. In these context, this paper defines what the financial soundness of public pension means specifically and presents the objective indices which help judge it, that is, implicit debt, cost rate, summarized cost rate, pension expenditure as percentage of GDP, and fund rate. Then, applying the indices, this paper analyzes the long-term financial situation of National Pension empirically and evaluates its financial soundness in exploratory perspective.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.116-132
• /
• 2023

Technology innovation companies are focusing on contributing to business performance by R&D project as a strategic tool. Successful R&D leads to corporate competitiveness enhancement, national industrial development, but there are high uncertainty and risks in R&D. Public and private R&D projects are carried out to achieve various purposes. It was verified how the risk management and benefit management of the R&D project affect the detailed R&D project performance between the Public and private domain. The impact of Project Leadership on R&D performance was also analyzed. Those who have participated in the Public and Private R&D projects at companies or research institutes were surveyed. First, it was found that project risk and benefit management have partially an effect on R&D project performance. Second, Public and private R&D Project Leadership showed partially a interaction effect between project management and project performance.