• 전자공학회논문지
• /
• 제53권5호
• /
• pp.152-159
• /
• 2016

본 논문은 CMOS 자기센서(hall Sensor)의 오프셋 및 1/f 잡음 제거기술 기반 고선형 자기센서 신호처리장치를 제안한다. 제안하는 자기센서는 자계(magnetic Field)를 감지하여 자계의 변화량에 따른 홀 전압(hall Voltage)을 출력하는 홀 플레이트(hall Plate)와 홀 플레이트 출력 신호의 오프셋과 1/f 잡음 제거 및 디지털화를 위한 자기센서 신호처리시스템으로 구성된다. 자기센서 신호처리 시스템은 스피닝 전류 바이어싱(spinning current biasing)을 통해 자기신호로부터 오프셋과 1/f잡음 성분을 분리하고, 초퍼 및 증폭기를 통해 자기신호를 100 kHz 주파수 대역으로 변조한다. 60 kHz 차단주파수를 갖는 고역통과필터(highpass filter)를 사용하여 오프셋 및 1/f 잡음을 제거한뒤 ADC(analog to digital converter)를 통해 자기신호만을 디지털 변조한다. 증폭기 및 고역통과필터 출력은 자기신호 -53.9 dBm @ 100 kHz, 잡음성부은 -101.3 dBm @ 10 kHz이다. 최종적으로 ADC를 통과한 자기센서 출력은 -5.0 dBm @ 100 kHz이고, 오프셋 및 1/f 잡음은 -55.0 dBm @ 10 kHz이다.

• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제19권8호
• /
• pp.1785-1796
• /
• 2015

본 논문에서는 각 단말에 2개 이상의 안테나의 간섭 정렬을 이용한 X채널에서 직교 및 준직교 시공간 블록 부호를 통하여 더 높은 다이버시티와 전력 이득을 달성하고자 했다. 제안한 방법으로 다이버시티 차수는 직교 시공간 블록 부호에서 최대에 도달한 반면, 준직교 시공간 블록 부호에서는 유효 채널 행렬의 비 직교성에 의해 약간의 성능 저하가 나타났다. 수신기의 유효 채널 행렬에서의 유리한 구조에 의해 단순 제로 포싱 수신기는 최대 다이버시티 차수를 달성하는 반면, 간섭 제거 수신기는 성능이 저하되었다. 기존의 방법과 비교했을 때, 시뮬레이션 결과는 제안된 방법이 같은 스펙트럼 효율을 얻으면서, 3-4개의 안테나의 각 단의 직교 시공간 블록 부호의 경우 각각 목표 비트 에러율 10^-4에서 14dB와 16.5bB의 이득을 얻는 것을 증명하였다. 또한 4개의 안테나의 각 단의 준직교 시공간 블록 부호의 경우 같은 목표 비트 에러율에서 10dB의 이득을 얻었다.

• 대한의용생체공학회:의공학회지
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.479-487
• /
• 2004

중추신경계손상으로 인하여 약화된 근육기능을 회복하기 위한 전기자극의 제어신호로 생체신호를 이용하고 있다. 생체신호중에서 마비된 근육에서 발생되는 자발적이면서 근수축을 하기에 부족한 자발근전도신호로 전기자극의 강도를 조절해야 하는 경우, 전기자극에 의해 발생되어 자발근전도신호에 섞이는 M-wave를 제거해야 한다. 본 연구에서는 M-wave를 제거하고 동시에 자발근전도신호의 크기를 보존하기 위한 최적필터를 설계하였고 최적필터의 계수는 입력 공분산 행렬의 최소고유치에 해당하는 고유벡터가 됨을 보였으며. inverse Power methd(IPM)을 사용하여 이를 적응적으로 구현하는 과정을 통해 기존의 예측오차필터 방법이 부최적 방법임을 보였다. 최적필터의 성능을 평가하기 위하여 모의데이터에 대한 false-positive rate를 측정하여 분석하였으며, 실험결과는 최적필터가 이전에 연구되었던 예측오차필터에 비해 효과적으로 M-wave를 제거할 수 있음을 보여준다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.459-488
• /
• 2004

General interest in the out-of-court dispute resolution system are mounting in Korea, and the spread of ADR(alternative dispute resolution) is the worldwide trend. In addition, it was confirmed that the resolution of disputes by ADR such as the decision based on arbitration made by the Prime Ministerial Administrative Decision Committee is no longer in exclusive possession of the civil case. The activation of ADR could lead to the smooth agreement between parties by getting away from the once-for-all mode of decision such as the dismissal of the application or the cancellation of disposal and the like in relation to administrative cases for the years. In consequence, it is anticipated that the administrative litigation that applicants have filed by not responding to the administrative decision would greatly reduce in the future. But, it would be urgent to provide for the legal ground of the ADR system through the revision of related laws to take root in our society because ADR has no legal binding power relating to the administrative case due to the absence of its legal grounds. The fundamental reason for having hesitated to introduce ADR in relation to the administrative case for the years is the protective interest of the third party as well as the public interest that would follow in case the agreement on the dispute resolution between parties brings the dispute to a termination in the domain of the public law. The disputes related to the contract based on the public law and the like that take on a judicial character as the administrative act have been settled within the province of ADR by applying the current laws such as the Civil Arbitration Law, Mediation Law, but their application to the administrative act of the administrative agency that takes on a character of the public law has been hesitated. But as discussed earlier, there are laws and regulations that has the obscure distinction between public and private laws. But there is no significant advantage in relation to the distinction between public and private laws. To supplement and cure these defects it is necessary to include the institutional arrangement for protection of the rights and benefits of the third party, for example the provision of the imposition of the binding power on the result of ADR between parties, in enacting its related law. It can be said that the right reorganization of the out-of-court dispute resolution system in relation to the administrative case corresponds with the ideology of public administration for cooperaton in the Administrative Law. It is high time to discuss within what realm the out-of-court dispute resolution system, alternative dispute resolution system, can be accepted and what binding power is imposed on its result, not whether it is entirely introduced into the administrative case. It is thought that the current Civil Mediation Law or Arbitration Law provides the possibility of applying arbitration or mediation only to the civil case, thereby opening the possibility of arbitration in the field of the intellectual property right law. For instance, the act of the state is not required in establishing the rights related to the secret of business or copyrights. Nevertheless, the disputes arising from or in connection with the intellectual property rights law is seen as the administrative case, and they are excluded from the object of arbitration or mediation, which is thought to be improper. This is not an argument for unconditionally importing ADR into the resolution of administrative cases. Most of the Korean people are aware that the administrative litigation system is of paramount importance as the legal relief for administrative cases. Seeing that there is an independent administrative decision system based on the Administrative Decision Law other than administrative litigation in relation to administrative cases, the first and foremost task is the necessity for the shift in thinking of people, followed by consideration of the plan for relief of the rights through the improvement of the administrative decision system. Then, it is necessary to formulate the plan for the formal introduction and activation of ADR. In this process, energetic efforts should be devoted to introducing diverse forms of ADR procedures such as settlement conference, case evaluation, mini-trial, summary jury trial, early neutral evaluation adopted in the US as the method of dispute resolution other than compromise, conciliation, arbitration and mediation

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.167-184
• /
• 2008

The economic cooperation between the South and North Koreas is a very important issue for the unification and economic development of both Koreas. In order to reach a successful economic cooperation, there is a need to coordinate the differences of the two countries before unification. The economic cooperation and the cooperation in other sectors will be followed by the entire unification. It is necessary to prepare a mechanism that could peacefully solve the conflicts and disputes that could arise during the actual process of cooperation, which will secure stable investments and trades. The study on the possibility of introducing the arbitration system as a conflict solving mechanism between the two Koreas is a very important subject, and the basis of this study is on the examination of the arbitration laws of North Korea. Therefore, the study on the efficiency of the North Korean arbitration laws on foreign economy is studying the possibility of a systematical solution to economic conflicts between the South and North Koreas. The problems and possible solutions of the North Korean foreign economy arbitration laws are summarized as follows. First, juridical cooperation system for both South and North courts of justice needs to be set up to smoothly carry out the main procedures. Mutual correspondence and telecommunication needs to be guaranteed, also remittance and the movement of goods shall precede. Second, the free liquidation of businesses by unit and the individual and independent management of wealth of the North Korean economic bodies, organizations and businesses shall precede to independently liquidate wealth and thus make arbitration possible. Third, amendments in the North Korea's foreign economy arbitration law shall be made to some parts of regulations on arbitration agreements and specific contents of written arbitration agreements to avoid conflicts regarding arbitration agreement. Fourth, the members of the North Korean arbitration committee shall impartially manage the committee only without taking the role of arbitrator, and the clause that allows the North Korean committee to nominate the arbitrator shall be erased. In case an agreement regarding the number of arbitrators is not reached, the three arbitrators general rule shall be applied. In case of requests from any of the parties, a third country arbitrator nomination shall be guaranteed. Also, the requested arbitrator by the party shall be nominated with the cooperation of the court. Fifth, the trial in case of non-appearance or written trial shall be added to the North Korean law in to prevent intended negligence or evasion. Sixth, regulations regarding the court's investigation of evidence shall be added to the North Korean law to make fair arbitration possible in case that government power is needed in order to investigate evidence. Seventh, provisions regarding majority decision shall be added in the North Korean law in the impossibility of unanimous decisions, and the certified system in the arbitration committee official text shall be erased to prevent arrogation and assure the power of the decision made by the arbitration government. Eighth, as "the wrong decision approved" reason for cancellation of arbitration in the North Korean law includes the content of the decision made by the arbitrator could lead to uselessness of arbitration, amendment will be necessary to limit it to legitimacy of the arbitration agreement and wrong procedures. It is hoped that this thesis will be of important use in understanding the issues on the workability and the solutions to the South and North Koreas' arbitration that could be presented during the negotiations for the countries' economic cooperation.