• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.17-24
• /
• 2004

목적: 유방절제술 후 방사선치료와 항암화학요법을 시행한 유방암 환자의 치료성적을 연구하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1989년부터 1995년까지 유방절제술 후 여성 유방암 병기 II-III로 방사선치료를 받았던 83명의 환자를 대상으로 후향적 분석을 시행하였다. 연령 분포는 $23\~77$세였고 중앙 연령은 46세로 77명은 변형된 근치적유방절제술을, 5명은 근치적 유방절제술을, 1명은 단순유방절제술을 받았다. 80명($96\%$)의 환자에서 액와림프절 전이 소견을 보였고 병리학적 병기상 11명이 2기초, 23명이 2기말, 44명은 3기초, 5명은 3기말이었다. 방사선치료는 80명의 환자에서 "hocky-stick 조사문"을 사용하였고 방사선치료 선량의 중앙값은 일일 1.8 Gy, 총 50.4 Gy였다. 74명($89\%$)의 환자에서 항암화학요법이 병행되었으며, 54명($65\%$)의 환자에서 CMF 혹은 doxorubicin이 포함된 약제가 투여되었다. 추적기간은 $8\~17$개월로 중앙값은 82개월이었다. 결과: 5년 및 10년 전체생존율은 각각 $65\%$와 $49\%$이었다. 생존율에 대한 단변량 및 다변량분석에서 병기 2기와 항암화학요법을 병행한 환자군에서 유의한 생존율의 증가를 보여 주었다. 국소재발률은 $16\%$였으며, 방사선치료 후 $4\~84$개월(중앙값: 20개월) 사이에 발생하였다. 국소재발을 보인 13명 중 6명은 국소 재발 단독으로, 그 외 7명은 원격전이와 동시에 국소재발이 발생하였다. 방사선 치료시기와 관련하여 수술 후 6개월 이내에 방사선치료를 받았던 환자군 에서는 국소재발률이 $141\%$인 반면 6개월 이후에 방사선치료를 시행한 경우는 $27\%$였다(p=0.24). 국소재발과 관련하여 시행한 단변량 및 다변량 분석에서는 항암화학요법의 병행 유무가 가장 유의한 예후인자 였다. 그러나 방사선과 항암제의 병행 방법에 따른 생존율이나 국소재발률의 차이는 보이지 않았다. 전체 환자의 약 1/3에서 방사선치료 후 $2\~92$개월(중앙값: 21개월) 사이에 원격전이가 관찰되었고 가장 흔히 침범되는 장기는 골이었다. 17명($20\%$)의 환자에서 방사선폐렴이 확인되었고 방사선 완료 후 $2\~7$개월(중앙값: 3개월) 사이에 발생하였다 이중 $65\%$ (l1/17)의 환자에 서는 단순흉부촬영상 폐섬유화 소견이 잔존하였다. 결론: 본 연구를 통하여 유방절제술 후 방사선치료가 필요하였던 유방암 환자에서 항암제의 병행 치료는 방사선 단독치료에 비해 종양의 국소제어율과 생존율이 향상됨을 알 수 있었다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.184-191
• /
• 2004

목적: 유방암의 치료에서 표준화된 치료와 방사선치료의 적정 사용을 제고하기 위하여 유방암으로 진단받은 환자들의 치료 현황을 전국적으로 조사하였다. 특히 유방암의 최신 치료법이고 방사선치료가 필수적인 유방보존술의 시행 빈도를 분석함으로써 우리나라 유방암 치료 수준을 평가하고 개선점을 찾고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1998년 1월부터 1998년 6월까지 유방암으로 최초 진단받은 환자들의 임상 특성과 치료 상황을 조사 하였다 조사대상 병원은 전국 병원을 지역별, 병원군별(3차병원 대 종합병원), 방사선치료시설 유무로 구별하여 표본병원으로 선정하였다. 총 27개 병원에 연구원들이 직접 방문하여 의무기록지와 암등록지를 토대로 조사표를 작성하였다. 결과: 유방암환자 총 1,048명에 대한 조사결과는 다음과 같다. 연령별 분포는 40대가 33.4$\%$로 가장 많았고 50대가 28.5$\%$, 30대가 22$\%$이었으며 평균연령은 46.4세였다. 수술 후 병기 분포는 AJCC stage II가 58.4$\%$, stage I이 23.5$\%$, stage 0가 6$\%$이었으며 stage II 이하로 조기에 진단되는 비율이 87.8$\%$였다. 전체 환자의 64.8$\%$가 전유방적출술을 받았고 26$\%$의 환자가 유방보존적 수술을 받았으며 4.5$\%$는 항암화학요법을 받은 후 수술을 하였고 4.6$\%$의 환자들은 수술을 시행하지 않았다. AJCC 병기 0기에서는 47.5%$\%$ I기에서는 54.4$\%$, II기에서는 20.3$\%$가 유방보존술을 받았 다. 유방보존술 후 방사선치료 시행율은 I기 93.4$\%$, II기 89.9$\%$, III기 33.3$\%$이었고 유방절제술 후 방사선치료는 III기의 45$\%$에서 시행되었다. 지역과 방사선치료시설 유$\cdot$무에 따라서 유방보존술 비율이 달랐다. 결론: 방사선치료의 활용도가 적정 수준에 미흡했는데 이는 의료진의 인식 부족과 주변에 활용가능한 방사선치료 시설의 부족, 경제적 여건 등이 원인으로 생각된다. 유방보존술의 활용도 역시 선진국 수준에는 미치지 못하고 있는데 이는 우리나라 유방암환자들이 유방을 보존하고자 하는 욕구가 적고 유방보존술의 장점에 대한 인식이 부족하기 때문으로 생각된다. 또한 방사선치료 시설이 없는 종합병원에서 유방보존술 시행 빈도가 상대적으로 적은 것을 관찰할 수 있었는데 주변 여건에 따라서 치료 방침이 결정될 수 있음을 알 수 있었다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.147-155
• /
• 2012

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people comprise about 2.5% of the Australian population. Cancer registry data indicate that their breast cancer survivals are lower than for other women but the completeness and accuracy of Indigenous descriptors on registries are uncertain. We followed women receiving mammography screening in BreastScreen to determine differences in screening experiences and survivals from breast cancer by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status, as recorded by BreastScreen. This status is self-reported and used in BreastScreen accreditation, and is considered to be more accurate. The study included breast cancers diagnosed during the period of screening and after leaving the screening program. Design: Least square regression models were used to compare screening experiences and outcomes adjusted for age, geographic remoteness, socio-economic disadvantage, screening period and round during 1996-2005. Survival of breast cancer patients from all causes and from breast cancer specifically was compared for the 1991-2006 diagnostic period using linked cancer-registry data. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to adjust for socio-demographic differences, screening period, and where available, tumour size, nodal status and proximity of diagnosis to time of screen. Results: After adjustment for socio-demographic differences and screening period, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women participated less frequently than other women in screening and re-screening although this difference appeared to be diminishing; were less likely to attend post-screening assessment within the recommended 28 days if recalled for assessment; had an elevated ductal carcinoma in situ but not invasive cancer detection rate; had larger breast cancers; and were more likely than other women to be treated by mastectomy than complete local excision. Linked cancer registry data indicated that five-year year survivals of breast cancer cases from all causes of death were 81% for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women, compared with 90% for other women, and that the former had larger breast cancers that were more likely to have nodal spread at diagnosis. After adjusting for socio-demographic factors, tumour size, nodal spread and time from last screen to diagnosis, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women had approximately twice the risk of death from breast cancer as other women. Conclusions: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women have less favourable screening experiences and those diagnosed with breast cancer (either during the screening period or after leaving the screening program) have lower survivals that persist after adjustment for socio-demographic differences, tumour size and nodal status.

• 대한통합의학회지
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.47-56
• /
• 2020

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of upper extremity volume, pain, and range of motion after participation in thera-band exercises according to the hand grip type in patients with breast cancer with upper extremity edema. We also aimed to determine the most efficient type of grip. Methods : The subjects were 10 female patients diagnosed with stage 2 breast cancer who had stage 2 lymphedema. Randomly, 5 patients each were allocated to the experimental and control groups. For six weeks, the patients in both the experimental and control groups exercised daily. In both groups, manual lymph drainage was applied for 1 hour. Afterward, patients in the experimental group placed their hands in the thera-band ring and exercised with their fingers outstretched. Patients in the control group exercised while holding the thera-band ring with a finger. Both the experimental group and the control group underwent measurements of the circumference of the upper extremity, pain, and range of motion of the shoulder joint at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 before and after exercise. Results : The upper arm circumference decreased by more in the experimental group in all weeks than before than that in the control group, and there was a statistically significant difference at 6 weeks. Compared with the difference between pre-exercise and 6 weeks post-exercise, the change in pain significantly decreased in the experimental group and showed a statistically significant difference. The shoulder range of motion increased in extension, external rotation, and internal rotation compared with that in the control group, and there was a statistically significant difference. Although the operating range increased in flexion and abduction, there were no statistically significant differences. Conclusion : In this study, we found that thera-band exercises with an open-hand grip are more efficient than thera-band exercises with a closed-hand grip in edema reduction, pain, and range of motion. In addition, it was found that it was more effective to continue the thera-band exercises with open-hand grip extended for at least 6 weeks rather than for a short time.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.1633-1636
• /
• 2015

Background: The advantages of Rapid Arc plans versus Intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for Carcinoma left breast were analyzed. Materials and Methods: In this study 20 Post mastectomy carcinoma left breast patients were analyzed. Both Intensity modulated Radiotherapy and Rapid Arc plans were generated for these patients. IMRT plans with 7 beams in an arc fashion and VMAT plans with two semi arcs were made to achieve 95% dose coverage to 100% volume. The plans were evaluated using Dose volume Histograms. Results: The mean Conformity and Homogeneity index in VMAT is found to be 1.05 and 0.065 respectively whereas in IMRT it was 1.07 and 0.069. The 20% volume of Heart received a mean dose of 960cGy in VMAT and 1300cGy in IMRT. The mean dose was 1236cGy in VMAT and 1870cGy in IMRT. The ipsilateral Lung received 3395cGy to 5% volume and 1840cGy to 20% volume on an average and the mean dose was 1205cGy in VMAT, while the same were found to be 3525cGy, 2012cGy and 1435cGy respectively in IMRT. The Contralateral Lung received a mean dose of 505cGy in VMAT and 553cGy in IMRT. The mean Monitor units in VMAT were 512MU and 1170MU in IMRT. The NTID in VMAT is $108.8{\times}10^5Gycm^3$ and $110.1{\times}10^5Gycm^3$ in IMRT. Conclusions: The target coverage, homogeneity and Conformity index were better in VMAT plans. The Ipsilateral Lung and heart dose were very less in VMAT plans. The Contralateral Lung dose and the Normal Tissue Integral Dose were also lesser in VMAT plans however the difference is not very appreciable. The MU in VMAT plans is almost 50% that of the IMRT plans which results in the reduction of treatment time. On the whole VMAT proves to be a better modality for treating Ca. Left Breast Patients.