• Title/Summary/Keyword: poetic formality

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

《시인옥설》에 나타난 송대 시안론

  • Lee, Gyu-Il
    • 중국학논총
    • /
    • no.68
    • /
    • pp.95-114
    • /
    • 2020
  • 《詩人玉屑》是南宋後期魏慶之所撰, 被評爲宋代三大詩話叢集之一. 此書收錄兩宋文人對詩格, 詩法的重要理論和見解. 尤其是宋代詩學的重要內容詩眼論, 《詩人玉屑》收錄很豐富的言論, 具有考察價值. 所謂詩眼指一首詩的眼目, 一句或一篇之內最精煉的字, 也是全詩主旨所在. 這概念從魏晉南北朝繪畫理論和禪宗理論發展來, 後來進入到宋代詩學領域. 詩眼的前提爲造語的創意性, 爲此需務去陳言而尋找新語. 宋人吸取經典語, 俗語, 方言, 禪語等, 以此爲創作的語言因子. 運用實字虛字是詩眼論的重要內容. 宋人認爲作詩眼時, 實字重於虛字, 動詞貴於名詞. 就位置而言, 宋人有"五字詩以第三字爲眼, 七字詩以第五字爲眼也"的共識, 同時强調活字, 響字, 拗字的活用. 但這不是要死守的固定原則, 而是相同於活法概念, 可以靈活運用.

A Speculation on the Prospect and Globalization of Modern Sijo (현대시조의 진로 모색과 세계화 문제 연구)

  • Im, Jong-Chan
    • Sijohaknonchong
    • /
    • v.23
    • /
    • pp.33-48
    • /
    • 2005
  • In my paper, the discussion focuses on the fact that sijo is distinguished from free verse as a separate Identity in that it has its own formal beauty, and the works that deviate from this poetic rule are guarded against. In the past ancient sijo, in terms of both music and literature, was a major genre in harmony with chang(songs) ; and in modern times, sijo been created irrelevantly with chug. But my point is that it will not futile if sijo is accompanied with chang, and, therefore, the latter should be adjusted to a modern taste and go together with the former ; and that, to attain this goal, Korean musicans should cooperate with sijo writers. With English-version sijo works, there are some that are put in accordance with the formality of Engish poetry. This paper indicates that, in this case, foreign readers can't feel the nuances the source text of sijo works could produce, so it is not proper to translate sijo works in accordance with the formality of English poetry. But there are other translations where the 3-jang(statements)-6-gu(phrases) form of the original sijo text is reproduced within the limits of English expressions, with each of the two gu(phrases) in a ing(statement) having an almost equal number of syllables, so that each phrase could be recited within the same length of time. The conclusion is that the Korean-English translations of sijo works should begin with the reproduction of its original formal beauty; but, to do this, sijo writers should create works in accordance with it original formality first. Therefore for good translations of sijo works there should be a mutual efforts between sijo scholars and English poetry scholars.

  • PDF