• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• v.16 no.15
• /
• pp.6765-6768
• /
• 2015

Aims: To study the effectiveness of human recombinant endostatin injection (Endostar(R)) combined with cisplatin doublets in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to evaluate outcome by CT perfusion imaging. Methods: From April 2011 to September 2014, 76 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with platinum-based doublets were divided into group A (36 patients) and group B (40 patients). Endostar(R) 15mg/day was administered 4 days before chemotherapy and combined with chemotherapy from day 5 in group A, and combined with chemotherapy from the first day in Group B. Endostar(R) in the two groups was injected intravenously for 14 days. Results: Treatment effectiveness in the two groups differed with statistical significance (p<0.05). Effectiveness evaluated by CT perfusion imaging, BF, BV, MTT and PS also demonstrated significant differences (all p<0.05). Adverse reactions in the two groups did not significantly vary (p> 0.05). Conclusions: The response rate with Endostar(R) administered 4 days before chemotherapy and combined with chemotherapy from day 5 in group A was better than Endostar(R) combined with chemotherapy from the first day, and CT perfusion imaging could be a reasonable method for evaluation of patient outcomes.

• Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.131-138
• /
• 2006

Heptaplatin, a new platinum derivative, has several contradicting reports on the nephrotoxicity. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the toxicities of heptaplatin-containing regimens in the chemotherapy. This study was performed retrospectively on seventy-seven patients with advanced gastric cancer who did not receive chemotherapy within the last 1 months before taking of heptaplatin- or cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. The 38 patients among total patients was received heptaplatin-containing regimens (26 with SEF regimens: heptaplatin/epirubicin/5-FU, 12 with SF regimens: heptaplatin/5-FU) and the rest 39 patients was received cisplatin-containg regimens (11 with CEF regimens: cisplatin/epirubicin/5-FU, 28 with ELF regimens: epirubicin/leucovorin/5-FU). Before and after the chemotherapy serum creatinine (Scr) and proteinuria were measured by urine stick test in all patient groups. Also Scr was measured a day before the second cycle and did not vary significantly between groups. However Scr on cycle 3 were significantly higher in SEF and SF groups. In case of proteinuria, it was more frequent on cycle 1 in heptaplatin/5-FU group. Proteinuria before and after on cycle 2 was not different between the two cisplatin -containing groups, but was more frequent in heptaplatin-containing groups. The reason why the Scr measured was not so different could be because we excluded the patients who received only one cycle of heptaplatin and changed the regimen due to signs of nephrotoxcity. As the results nephrotoxicity such as protienuria was appeared to be more frequent with heptaplatin-treated patients. It suggests that the clinical consequences of the toxicity need to further evaluation and also the modalities to prevent or minimize nephrotoxicity of heptaplatin should be studied for future utilization of the drug.

• Proceedings of the PSK Conference
• /
• 2003.10b
• /
• pp.250.2-251
• /
• 2003

There are contradicting reports on the nephrotoxicity of heptaplatin, a new platinum derivative. A retrospective study was performed to compare the toxicities of heptaplatin-containing regimens with the ones not. Seventy-seven patients with advanced gastric cancer who did not receive any chemotherapy within the last 3 months before the treatment were evaluated. Among them 38 patients received heptaplatin-containing regimens (heptaplatin/epirubicin/5-FU: 26, heptaplatin/5-FU: 12) and 39 patients received other regimens (cisplatin/epirubicin/5-FU:11, epirubicin/leucovorin/5-FU: 28). (omitted)

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• v.13 no.10
• /
• pp.5119-5124
• /
• 2012

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of gemcitabine and paclitaxel combinations with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) who have progressive disease after platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the file records of patients treated with gemcitabine plus paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic NSCLC cases in a second-line setting. The chemotherapy schedule was as follows: gemcitabine $1500mg/m^2$ and paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 administered every two weeks. Results: Forty-eight patients (45 male, 3 female) were evaluated; stage IIIB/IV 6/42; PS0, 8.3%, PS1, 72.9%, PS2, 18.8%; median age, 56 years old (range 38-76). Six (12.5%) patients showed a partial response (PR), 13 (27.1%) stable disease (SD), and 27 (56.3%) progressive disease (PD). The median OS was 6.63 months (95% CI 4.0-9.2); the median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 1.8-3.6). Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities, including neutropenia (n=4, 8.4%), and anemia (n=3, 6.3%) were encountered, but no grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. There were no interruption for reasons of toxicity and no exitus related to therapy. Conclusion: The combination of two-weekly gemcitabine plus paclitaxel was an effective and well-tolerated second-line chemotherapy regimen for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Although the most common and dose limiting toxicities were neutropenia and neuropathy, this regimen was tolerated well by the patients.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• v.16 no.9
• /
• pp.4013-4018
• /
• 2015

Objective: To explore the clinical application of recombinant human endostatin (Endostar) in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Chinese mainland. Materials and Methods: A total of 75 patients diagnosed as NSCLC were randomly divided into control group (37 cases) and treatment group (38 cases). Control group was treated with postoperative complementary chemotherapy containing two-agent platinum protocol on postoperative d21, 3 weeks as a cycle, for totally 4~6 cycles. On this basis, treatment group was added with Endostar $7.5mg/m^2$ on postoperative d8~9, 3~4 h/time, qd, 14 weeks as a cycle, for totally 4 cycles. The interval between every two cycles was 7 d. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), 5-year survival time and complications in both groups were observed. Results: Compared with control group, the average PFS increased evidently in treatment group by 9.8 months (41.6 months vs. 31.8 months), and there was significant difference (P<0.05). And the median PFS was 42.5 months in treatment group, obviously longer than that in control group (33.7 months) by 8.8 months (P<0.05). Additionally, the 5-year overall survival rate (OS), average survival time and median survival time (MST) were 47.4%, 50.1 months and 59.3 months in treatment group, significantly higher than the 29.7%, 42.1 months and 43.5 months in control group (P<0.05). Only 1 patient showed poor healing of surgical wound in treatment group, but no surgery-associated complication was found in control group. Moreover, the postoperative complementary therapy-connected complication rates were 63.2% (24/38) and 59.5% (22/37) in treatment group and control group respectively, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusions: The application of Endostar combined with sensitive platinum-contained chemotherapeutic agents in the postoperative complementary chemotherapy can be widely used in clinic because it can significantly prolong the long-term survival time of patients with NSCLC.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.132-144
• /
• 2017

Purpose: To identify baseline prognostic factors for survival in patients with disease progression, during or after chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. Materials and Methods: We pooled data from patients randomized between 2009 and 2012 in 2 phase III, global double-blind studies of ramucirumab for the treatment of advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma following disease progression on first-line platinum- and/or fluoropyrimidine-containing therapy (REGARD and RAINBOW). Forty-one key baseline clinical and laboratory factors common in both studies were examined. Model building started with covariate screening using univariate Cox models (significance level=0.05). A stepwise multivariable Cox model identified the final prognostic factors (entry+exit significance level=0.01). Cox models were stratified by treatment and geographic region. The process was repeated to identify baseline prognostic quality of life (QoL) parameters. Results: Of 1,020 randomized patients, 953 (93%) patients without any missing covariates were included in the analysis. We identified 12 independent prognostic factors of poor survival: 1) peritoneal metastases; 2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 1; 3) the presence of a primary tumor; 4) time to progression since prior therapy <6 months; 5) poor/unknown tumor differentiation; abnormally low blood levels of 6) albumin, 7) sodium, and/or 8) lymphocytes; and abnormally high blood levels of 9) neutrophils, 10) aspartate aminotransferase (AST), 11) alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and/or 12) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Factors were used to devise a 4-tier prognostic index (median overall survival [OS] by risk [months]: high=3.4, moderate=6.4, medium=9.9, and low=14.5; Harrell's C-index=0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.68). Addition of QoL to the model identified patient-reported appetite loss as an independent prognostic factor. Conclusions: The identified prognostic factors and the reported prognostic index may help clinical decision-making, patient stratification, and planning of future clinical studies.