• Title/Summary/Keyword: phonics instruction

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

Effects of Literacy Instruction Methods for Young Children : On Balanced Literacy Instruction and Phonics Instruction (유아를 위한 문해 교수법의 효과 비교: 균형잡힌 문해 교수법과 발음중심 교수법을 중심으로)

  • Eum, Yoon-Jae;Park, Hye-Kyung
    • Korean Journal of Child Studies
    • /
    • v.25 no.6
    • /
    • pp.259-277
    • /
    • 2004
  • The effects of two literacy programs, Balanced Literacy Instruction(BLI) and Phonics Instruction were studied in 40 three- and four-year old children. BLIwas created to compensate for the limits of the Whole Language Approach(WLA) and of Phonics Instruction(PI). The WLA focuses on writing and communication but lacks concrete instruction methods and overlooks technical aspects of reading and writing. On the contrary, PI is logical, stressing phonemic recognition, skill in distinguishing words, and the rules of consonants and vowels. By combining the best of both PI and WLA to create BLI, this study showed that children who received BLI significantly improved their ability of phoneme recognition, reading, writing and understanding of the content of a book, letting us conclude that BLI is the more effective method for teaching literacy.

  • PDF

Contents Analysis on Hangul-learning Applications for Preschoolers - Comparative Analysis by Teaching Methods (유아대상 한글학습용 애플리케이션 평가 및 내용 분석 -언어 교수방법에 따른 비교 분석)

  • Suh, Joo Hyun
    • Korean Journal of Childcare and Education
    • /
    • v.11 no.2
    • /
    • pp.21-37
    • /
    • 2015
  • The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contents of Korean-learning applications by comparing two teaching methods(Phonics Instruction/Whole Language Approach). For this purpose, a total of 51 Korean-learning applications were analysed. The instruments used in this study were developed based on Applications for preschoolers Evaluation Criteria and Vocabulary Game Applications for preschoolers Evaluation Criteria. The collected data were analyzed by using a t-test. The main results are as follows. First, 'Developmental appropriateness' had the highest scores whereas 'Amusement' had the lowest scores in general. Second, there was a significant difference in 'Interaction' by teaching method. Implications for the development of more systematic Korean-learning applications for preschoolers are discussed.