• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.129-142
• /
• 2002

The Kyeongbok Palace was completely renewed during the reign of King Sejong, the fourth King of the Joseon Dynasty(1392-1910). The repair was done for the two main purpose; one was to obtain the dignity of the main palace of the dynasty, the other was to make the palace suitable for the performing of the various ritual ceremonies. It was under the reign of King Sejong that every detail of the procedure of the royal ritual ceremony. The procedure of ritual ceremony changed the buildings of the palace. The quarter of Sajeong-jeon, King's office, was changed remarkably from the original form as the building became the beginning and ending point of King's moving during the ritual ceremonies. The site of the palace had ill reputation from the point of geomancy since its establishment. King Sejong ignored the rumor and kept the palace as usual. In his later year's, Sejong had tried to build a detached quarter and a Buddhist shrine in the palace. But he had to give up his plan because of the retainer's strong opposition. The original layout of the Kyeongbok Palace could be remained as the King renounced his controversial personal wish. King Sejong deserves a full credit for the establishment of the Kyeongbok Palace as the main palace of the Joseon Dynasty.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.71-87
• /
• 2005

4 royal palaces are currently remained from capital city (Seoul) of 'Cho-Sun(朝鮮)' period. In these palaces, 'Main hall of Royal Palace(正殿)' is the center of the Royal Palaces. The 'Main hall of Royal Palace' of the Royal Palace was the best building of that time. Therefore there were many studies about the 'Main hall of Royal Palace'. But these studies were individual studies of these 'Main hall of Royal Palace'. Therefore, this study is to analyze and compare 4 'Main hall of Royal Palace' of the Royal palaces. It is to study the proportion regarding the Diameter of the pillar, the Height, the pillar and pillar Interval's Distance, and the arrangement of 'Kong-Po(bracket sets)'. With these studies, it is to prove that the 'Main hall of Royal Palace' is the building which high construction technique of this time is expressed. Result of this study is as followings; First, the proportion of pillar height(H) to its diameter(D) average from H=8.0 to 8.5D. Only the Myeong-Jeong-Jeon omitted the 'Go-Ju(高柱)' in the 'Toi-Kan (退間)' to place Ea-Jwa(御座). Second, Second, the proportion of diameter of the pillar of 'Eoi-Bu-Pyeong-Ju(外部平柱)' and 'Nae-Jin-Go-Ju(內陣高柱)' average D1(Diameter of 'Eoi-Bu-Pyeong-Ju') =0.91D2 (Diameter of 'Nae-Jin-Go-Ju'). In regards to the height, the single floor 'Main hall of Royal Palace' and double floor 'Main hall of Royal Palace' seems to be different. The height proportion of the double floor 'Main hall of royal palace' is H1(Height of 'Eoi-Bu-Pyeong-Ju')=0.34H2(Height of 'Nae-Jin-Go-Ju') and single floor 'Main hall of Royal Palace' has a proportion of H1=0.62H2. Third, in Geun-Jeong-Jeon, with the proportion of height and diameter of the pillar, interval's distance between pillars and diameter, the pillar interval distance and height, of 'Ea-kan(御間)' from the 'Toi-Kan' is different from 'Main hall of Royal Palace'. This is because the structure of 'Toi-Kan' of Geun-Jeong-Jeon is not stable. In order to reinforce this, 'Gui-Go-Ju(隅高柱)' of the Geun-Jeong-Jeon jut out $4{\sim}7%$ more compared to In-Jeong-Jeon. Fourth, when comparing double floor 'Main hall of royal palace' of Geun-Jeong-Jeon and In-Jeong-Jeon, based on distance of 'Eoi-Bu-Pyeong-Ju' and 'Nae-Jin-Go-Ju' of lower level, the 'Sang-Bu-Pyeong-Ju(上部平柱)' of Geun-Jeong-Jeon jut out $4{\sim}7%$ more compared to the In-Jeong-Jeon and also It becomes thicker. Fifth, the arrangement of 'Kong-Po' on the front row of 'Gan(間)' had to do with the change of side 'Gan'. Even though the Geun-Jeong-Jeon and the In-Jeong-Jeon were double floors, the arrangement of the 'Kong-Po' is different because the number of side bay is different.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.105-113
• /
• 2010

Seungjeongwon Ilgi["承政院日記"], the Diaries of Royal Secretariat of the Joeson Dynasty is the most massive compilation of records in Korean history. Medical records in Seungjeongwon Ilgi have been studied but the procedures of clinical discussion[議藥] have not yet been studied. In this paper, main agents of clinical discussion, formation of participant doctor system, particularity of clinical discussion in Royal Court and problems derived from it will be discussed. Main agents of clinical discussion were court doctors[內醫], royal doctors[御醫] and participant doctors[議藥同參]. The king himself decided ultimately as a matter of form. Head of the Medical Dpt. of the Palace[藥房都提調] was in charge of attending to king, but head of the court doctor[首醫] led the actual discussion of deciding treatment. The Medical Dpt. of the Palace[內醫院] was divided into three sectors-court doctor division, acupuncture doctor division and participant doctor division. Palace doctors payed a great attention to avoid serious error. This tendency led them occasionally to passive management. Sometimes aggressive treatment is needed in the course of treating disease, but palace doctors tended to choose slow and gradual methods. It induced minor conflict between palace doctors and participant doctors from outside palace, because doctors from outside palace subordinated effectiveness. Their opinion had not been always recognized by court doctors. However, their role was meaningful because they provided flexibility to the rigidity of clinical discussion in the palace. It is important to evaluate clinical records in Seungjeongwon Ilgi["承政院日記"]. If we have broader eye on the clinical procedure in the palace, we can estimate the value of the contents more objectively and accurately.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.53-64
• /
• 2014

During the Joseon Dynasty, Injeongjeon area at Changdeokgung Palace was a core space in which major state affairs took place. Since founded in 1405, the Injeongjeon area's spatial composition has been changed while it was repeatedly burned down and rebuilt several times. However, despite many studies and researches on the Chandeokgung Palace and the Injeongjeon area, the changes of the area in the 20th century have not been examined thoroughly. This study attempts to find out the procedure and purposes of the remodeling of the Injeongjeon area in 1908. It is possible to presume that the motif of this remodeling construction, worked out by the Residency-General, was to transform the area similar to Ekkensho or Audience Hall area at Meiji Palace regarding the following facts: only Japaneses' participation in the construction, renaming the area as Alhyunso (Ekkensho), and involvement of Ito Hirobumi. Comparing plans of the remodeled Injeongjeon area at the Chandeokgung Palace with the Ekkensho area at the Meiji Palace, we can confirm this presumption and suggest the possibility that the Residency-General wanted to reduce the majesty and power of the Joseon Dynasty's Palace by this remodeling.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.43-64
• /
• 2008

Kyeongbokgung succeeded in regaining its status as a royal palace after the reconstruction that began in the second year of King Gojong(1865) only to have most of its buildings taken down in the early 20th century. Fortunately, however, there is the Pukkwoldohyong(Map of North Palace), which drew out each of the buildings of Kyeongbokgung and their arrangement in details in 1907 when the royal palace lost its original appearance. And there is another plot plan of the royal palace at the Korea University Museum, which labeled it Kyeongbokgung-Baechido(Planning Map of Kyeongbokgung Palace). The map presents almost the same plan as Pukkwoldohyong in terms of making and expressive methods, being estimated to have been made in 1888 since its building arrangement doesn't show the changes made after 1890. The map also offers more information about the uses of each building than Pukkwoldohyong and matches the excavation results of the relics. Kyeongbokgung-Jeondo(Map of Kyeongbokgung Palace), which is recorded to be made during the reconstruction of the palace in the early years of King Gojong in historical materials, describes the shapes and arrangements of the buildings in a concrete and realistic fashion. The Kyeongbokgung-Baechido seems to be one of the plans made in the process of restoring and repairing buildings that were lost or destroyed in fire. The Kyeongbokgung-Baschido has the following historic values; 1) it provides dues to estimate the early state of the palace after the reconstruction during the reign of King Gojong. In fact the Sujeongjeon and Heungbokjeon show the early state of the reconstruction; 2) it contains data with which to understand the changes to the palace after 1890, around which they added Hamhwadang and Jibokjae; and 3) it offers information about the uses of the palace's buildings from 1885 to 1880 with its descriptions of the building purposes and relationships regarding the life in the palace.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture International Edition
• /
• 제1호
• /
• pp.120-126
• /
• 2001

The Haidian Garden of Zhongguancun Science and Technology Zone is an area with high intellectual intensity. It is therefore known as China's Silicon Valley. The Summer Palace, a World Heritage Site, sits in the northwest part of it. 250 years ago, the construction of imperial gardens in this area, including the Summer Palace, gave birth to the appearance and prosperity of the town of Haidian. This will also provide various opportunities for the growth of the science and technology. Today the green space, the cultural and ecological environment of the Summer Palace, and its 3-kilometer buffer zone are becoming one important strategic factor for the Haidian Garden to attract talents, improve international competitiveness and realize sustainable development. How to taking advantage of the favorable resources, to achieve balance between protection of the environment around the Summer Palace and urban development, will be of great importance in the future plans of the science and technology.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.87-100
• /
• 1991

The purpose of this study is to find the bases for the restoration of traditional Palace gardening by chronologically analyzing the change of space in Changduk Palace. The result of analyzing archives and Dongguldo is that the most of present spaces are considerably differ from the spaces of traditional Palace. But the backyard of Palace was not greatly damaged and the spaces of Injungjun and Daejojun was immediatly restored.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.9-27
• /
• 1998

It could be said that the Kyongbok Palace, the main palace of the Chosun Dynasty which built in the early years of the Dynasty, had two main architectural characters. One ; the entire building complex was arranged under the influence of ancient Chinese building principle based on the Confucian ideas. Two ; building compositions and shape of each buildings were succeeded from the palace of the former Koryo Dynasty, especially on the latter periods of it. The architecture of the Kyongbok Palace had formed its own uniqueness by developing these two characters.

• 한국전통조경학회지
• /
• 제40권4호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 2022

동북아시아 고대 궁원은 왕도와 왕궁에서의 위치 관계에 따라 왕궁 내부의 북쪽, 왕궁 외부의 북쪽, 왕궁 내부나 외부의 남쪽에 위치하는 세 가지 유형으로 구분된다. 첫 번째는 전조후침(前朝後寢)의 중국 고대 궁실제도를 따른 전형적인 궁원이다. 두 번째는 왕궁과 독립적으로 위치하거나, 금원(禁苑)으로 확장되는 궁원이다. 세 번째는 왕궁의 남쪽에 위치하면서 유락(遊樂)이나 향연(饗宴)으로 특화한 궁원이다. 동북아시아 고대 궁원의 유형은 정궁(正宮)과 별궁(別宮) 혹은 이궁(離宮), 금원(禁苑)과의 관계에 따라 구분되고 각각 독특한 특징을 지니고 있다. 첫 번째는 익산 왕궁리 유적의 궁원을 비롯하여 한 장안성, 북위 낙양성과 남조 건강성, 당 대명궁 등에 이르기까지 정궁의 궁원으로 자리잡아왔다. 여기에서는 왕궁 안으로는 궁원이 내원(內苑)으로, 왕궁 밖으로 금원이 외원(外苑)으로 분리되어 있다. 반면에 두 번째는 궁원(宮苑)과 금원(禁苑)이 일체화되어 있다. 세 번째는 왕궁의 일부분을 구성하거나 왕도에서 정궁과 독립된 공간으로 별궁이나 이궁의 궁원으로 특화되어 왔다. 중국은 동북아시아 고대 궁원의 전형(典型)을 만들었으며, 이를 기초로 하여 한국의 백제와 신라, 일본은 서로 영향을 주고받으면서 나름대로 독창성을 발휘하여 독특한 궁원을 발전시켜 나갔다. 백제왕도 익산의 궁원은 위진남북조시대의 궁원을, 사비도성의 궁원은 진·한대와 수·당대의 궁원을, 신라왕경의 궁원은 사비도성과 당의 궁원을, 일본 아스카~나라시대의 궁원은 백제와 신라의 궁원을 영향을 각각 받았다. 그렇지만 이들 궁원은 각각 나름대로 자신만의 독특한 궁원의 특징도 지니고 있다. 이런 점으로 보아, 동북아시아 고대 궁원은 지역에 따라 계통이 달랐음을 알 수 있다. 평양 안학궁은 궁원으로 보아서는 삼국시대부터 조영될 가능성이 높다. 다만 안학궁 하부의 유구 중복 관계나 유물로 보아 그 초축 시기는 5~6세기로 올려보기 어렵고 대체로 7세기 중엽으로 추정된다. 평양 안학궁의 궁원은 평양 장안성의 정궁에 대응하는 별궁 혹은 이궁의 궁원으로서 한국 통일신라시대 동궁과 월지나 일본 나라시대 평성궁 동원정원(東院庭園)에 영향을 끼친 것으로 판단된다. 이런 점으로 보아, 평성궁 동원정원(東院庭園)은 고구려, 백제, 신라의 궁원과 관련된 것으로 보인다. 본 연구는 동북아시아의 고대 왕도라는 큰 틀에서 궁원의 위치 관계로 그 특징과 변천을 중점적으로 다룬 연구로 적지 않은 한계를 지니고 있다. 이런 한계들을 조금씩 해결하여 나간다면, 동북아시아 고대 궁원에 대한 이해의 폭이 훨씬 넓어지리라 기대해 본다.

• 한국전통조경학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.52-64
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 동아시아 삼국 한국, 중국 그리고 일본 고정원 문화의 정수이자 역사적 배경과 정치, 문화적 관계성 등을 공간적으로 잘 대변할 수 있는 궁궐정원을 대상으로 형성배경, 입지와 배치, 공간구성, 공간구성요소 그리고 조성계획 및 경관연출기법과 조망적 특징을 비교, 분석하였다. 이를 위하여 유사한 위상을 가진 한국의 창덕궁, 중국의 이화원 그리고 일본의 선동어소를 선정하여 3국의 궁궐정원에 대한 이해와 연구기반을 구축하고자 하였다. 또한 경관 연출을 중심으로 한중일 궁궐정원의 원형에 대한 비교와 분석을 통해 동질성(유사성) 및 이질성(차별성)을 찾아 한중일 궁궐정원이 가지는 정체성을 규명하고 나아가 한국 궁궐정원이 가지는 가치를 제시하고자 하였다. 동질성과 이질성을 기반으로 도출된 비교특성은 다음과 같다. 첫째 자연을 훼손하지 않은 정원의 조성으로 자연에 순응한 한국 고유의 양식을 보여준다. 둘째 동아시아적 사상을 반영한 다양한 상징적 정원요소가 표현되고 있다. 우리 궁궐정원의 발달에 있어 중국의 사상과 기술, 기법 등이 큰 영향을 끼쳤고 또한 유사한 방식으로 공간에 구현되었음을 알 수 있다. 수경관을 적극적으로 활용한 유사함은 한국과 중국뿐만 아니라 일본에서도 찾을 수 있다. 셋째 창덕궁 후원은 엄격한 왕권의 권위보다 풍류적 취향의 문화 예술적 수용체 역할을 하였다. 창덕궁과 이화원, 그리고 선동어소가 문화수용체의 성격을 지니듯이 한중일 3국이 문화적으로 긴밀하게 연결되어 있음에도 그 형태와 재현의 방법이 다르며 각각 독자적인 궁정정원의 양식을 수립할 수 있었던 것은 각 정원이 각 나라 고유의 문화와 예술을 수용하면서 발전해왔기 때문이다.