• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.115-120
• /
• 2022

New realities of social relations are changing the understanding of certain phenomena, including the emergence of new concepts among the objects of property rights, such as: virtual assets, and the circulation of virtual assets. The rapid development of the virtual assets market involves the legislative consolidation of the status of such assets, changes in taxation, their circulation, and so on. These circumstances increase the interest in the study of virtual assets as the latest object of property rights and necessitate the study of this topic. The work aims to explore the theoretical developments and regulations on virtual assets in the modern world, as well as to summarize the conclusions about virtual assets as the latest object of property rights. The object of research is the content of the concept of "virtual asset" and its legal status. The methodology of work is represented by a set of methods and techniques that were used to achieve this goal, namely: hermeneutic, historical, extrapolation, comparative law, generalization, analysis, synthesis, and deduction. The study analyzed different approaches to understanding virtual assets, analyzed the characteristics of virtual assets, and concluded that in today's conditions there is no single unified legal regulation of virtual assets, although many countries are moving towards consolidating the status of virtual assets.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제64권
• /
• pp.39-64
• /
• 2014

The object of International License Contract is technology. Technology is means to produce visible goods, which are human's intellectual creations such as Intellectual Property Right - patent, design, trademark- and Know-how. Unlike visible goods which decrease as being used, these technologies are possible to be produced expansively and develop additionally. Therefore, the way to make a contract of goods is a sales contract which transfers ownership while technology follows license contract which gives approval of use for a certain period. International license contract means that licensor has right to possess, allows licensee to use licensed technology for a fixed period and takes royalty. So there are various matters such as selection of the duration of a contract, confirmation of technology range, competition limitation, technique guidance and support, calculation of royalty, withholding tax between parties. This study examines licensor's grant of license and competition limitation. Intellectual property rights fundamentally give exclusive rights to the creator so the licensor use or dispose of his or her intellectual property rights at will. Technology transfer is possible through license contract because of this right. But licensor must exercise his or her intellectual property rights within a reasonable limit. It means, when licensor makes an unreasonable demand abusing his or her position, it is regarded as competition limitation clause and the deal itself may become null. Therefore, restraint on competition needs to be examined in detail as it influences on contract validity. Each country has their own competition laws for establishing a fair market order and inspection guide and guideline for judging whether there is any unfair act related to intellectual property rights. Judgment on intellectual property rights is subject the technology-introduced country's domestic laws and thus, contracting parties each need to precede opposite nation's domestic laws system.

• 한국통신학회논문지
• /
• 제26권7A호
• /
• pp.1284-1289
• /
• 2001

The characteristics of the intellectual property right(IPR) conflict with standardization. This is because standardization aims to achieve the common use of technology while IPRs aim to protect the proprietary right on technology. The license to use IPR should be granted so that standards can be used without an infringement. IPR policies have common characteristics in most parts of their contents and also different application methodologies. The ultimate object of IPR policy is to receive license grant. In this paper, significant typical IPR policies of main standardization organizations are comparatively analyzed. The overall objective of the IPR policy is to make strategic environment for license grant. IPR disclosure becomes the best practice to acquire license grant. With this practice, the action to licensing refusal becomes one of the main strategic factors of IPR policies.

• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제6권6호
• /
• pp.71-83
• /
• 2005

본 논문에서는 분산시스템 상의 클라이언트로부터 요청되는 객체 자원들에 대한 그룹관리 및 동적 바인딩을 지원하는 분산객체그룹 프레임워크 기반에서 편리하게 분산응용 프로그램을 작성할 수 있는 분산 프로그래밍 도구(Distributed Programming Developing Tool: DPDT)를 개발했다. 분산객체그룹 프레임워크는 서버객체에 대한 그룹등록/철회, 접근권한, 이름과 속성서비스 등의 그룹관리 서비스와 동적 바인딩, 중복객체 지원, 부하 균형화 및 분산응용 간의 연동 등의 분산응용 지원 서비스를 제공한다. 분산응용의 개발 시 본 툴을 이용하여, 서버 프로그램 개발자는 해당 서버시스템 상에서 객체들을 구현하고 객체그룹에 서비스 제공에 필요한 속성정보를 등록하며, 클라이언트 프로그램 개발자도 이들 객체 또는 객체그룹에 대한 접근권한을 받아 허가된 객체들의 속성정보를 사용하여 클라이언트 프로그램을 작성할 수 있다. 이를 위해 본 논문에서는 객체그룹에 대한 정의와 본 툴이 지원하는 분산객체그룹 프레임워크의 구조와 기능들을 살펴보고, 분산객체그룹 프레임워크와 분산응용 간의 편리한 인터페이스를 제공할 수 있도록 구현한 DPDT의 3개의 GUI 환경들에 대해 기술하였다. 마지막으로 DPDT를 사용하여, 서버 프로그램으로 구현된 객체들의 그룹등록/철회, 접근권한 부여 및 클라이언트 프로그램의 작성과정과 개발된 분산응용의 수행결과를 보였다.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.21-46
• /
• 1998

The government is largely responsible for preventing “the tragedy of the common property”, but fisherman's effort fer an autonomous fishery control is equally required. Especially in these days of EEZ such self- regulated fishery management system should be developed and cared for as well. This study aimed to explore a proper management system for coastal fishing ground that now requires the responsible fisheries management by investigating and analysing more drastically the managerial functions of fishery right by Eochon-Gye(the smallest unit of fisheries cooperative based on a fishing village), a typical fishery producer's organization in Korea. This study also included such contents as (1) an understanding of fishery producer's organization, (2) the utilization and management system of coastal fishing ground, (3) the actual condition of fishing right distribution in Korea, (4) the fishery right management and activity of Eochon-Gye, (5) the operation and distinctive feature of fishery right in Japan, (6) the intervention and limit of fishery producer's organization for fishing ground management function, and (7) summary and proposal. We made all Eochon-Gye of the whole country an object of this study and carried out an investigation into Eochon-Gye through a questionnaire. We extracted 359 Eochon-Gye, 20% of the total 1,719 Eochon-Gye as a random sample and investigated these regions through a questionnaire by mail. The contents of the questions consist of 40 items, including six categories about the organization of eochon-gye, and fishing ground management and activities.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국벤처창업학회 2007년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.15-43
• /
• 2007

본 연구의 목적은 해외지식재산권 침해 현황을 분석하고 그 대응방안을 제시하는데 있다. $1990{\sim}2005$년 동안 출원된 특허를 대상으로 2005년까지 발생한 권리분쟁은 모두 3,508회 발생하였으며, 이 중 무효심판(전부 무효 포함)이 1,903회로 가장 많은 것으로 나타났다. 소극적 권리범위 확인 심판은 1,001회 발생하여 발생된 분쟁의 28.5%를 차지하고 있으며, 특허권자가 권리를 침해받은 경우에 제기하는 적극적 권리범위 확인심판은 366회 발생하였다. 일본은 권리분쟁이 모두 275회 발생하여 다른 국가의 특허권자에 비해 분쟁횟수가 가장 높고, 그 중 무효심판이 107회로 38.9% 정정심판이 두 번째로 많은 83회 발생하여 30.2%를 차지하고 있다. 미국은 일본에 이어 두 번째로 분쟁횟수가 많으며, 무효심판이 66회로 무려 64.7%에 달하며, 정정심판은 21회 발생하여, 20.6%를 차지하고 있다. 해외지식재산권 침해 대응방안은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 정부의 대응방향이다. 해외지식재산권보호센터 기능의 강화, 특허권 침해물품의 국경조치 강화, 국제특허분쟁연구회 활동 강화, 국제특허분쟁 전문가의 양성, 특허소송 관할법원의 집중과 심판제도의 마련, 사회적 자본으로서 신뢰 구축 등을 수행하여야 한다. 둘째, 기업의 대응방향이다. 지식재산중시 경영(No Patent No Future), 출원 및 분쟁대응의 전문화, 특허풀(Patent Pool) 형성 및 표준화에 적극 참여, 기술이전 및 라이센스 계약 관리의 전문화 등을 기하여야 한다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.23-45
• /
• 2008

본 연구의 목적은 해외 지식재산권 분쟁현황을 분석하고 그 대응방안을 제시하는데 있다. 특허 분쟁(국내/국외)은 2006년 7월말 현재 청구건수 기준으로 2,044건이 보고되고 있다. 이 중 외국 기업과의 특허분쟁(2000-2006)은 전기전자 분야 47건, 화학약품분야 9건, 기계분야 2건 등 58건으로 나타나고 있다. 본 연구는 주요 국제 특허분쟁 사례, 즉 우리나라의 기업체가 외국기업체를 상대로 특허침해 소송을 제기하였거나 소송을 제기 당한 사례를 전기.전자 분야 47건 중 27건, 화학약품분야 9건 중 5건, 기계분야 2건 등 34건을 기술 분야별로 정리하였다. 이들 사례의 공통점은 대개 거액을 지불하고 분쟁을 타결한 경우로서 지식재산권 관리의 중요성과 분쟁 시 정부나 기업이 적절한 대응을 하여야 함을 시사하고 있다. 우리나라가 해외 지식재산권 분쟁에 대응할 수 있는 방안은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 정부의 대응방향이다. 특허권 침해물품의 국경조치 강화, 해외지식재산권보호센터 기능의 강화 등을 수행하여야 한다. 둘째, 기업의 대응방향이다. 지식재산중시 경영(no patent no future), 강한 특허권 창출 및 전략적 분쟁 대응, 특허 풀(patent pool) 형성 및 표준화에 적극 참여, 기술이전 및 라이센스 계약 관리의 전문화 등을 기하여야 한다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.47-68
• /
• 2004

The problems on application for custody in CIETAC Arbitration Rule are examined in this paper. First, The issue of jurisdiction for application for custody is arisen from the expansion of material jurisdiction of CIETAC. Until 1998, CIETAC had a jurisdiction only for the cases involving foreigners, but now, it has a jurisdiction not only for the cases involving foreigners but also for domestic cases. In the cases of arbitrating disputes involving foreigners, if the parties concerned apply for the preservation of property, CITEAC shall forward the application to and obtain a ruling from an intermediate people's court in the place where the object of the application resides, or where the property is located. But in the cases of arbitrating domestic disputes, if the parties concerned apply for the preservation of property, CITEAC shall forward the application to and obtain a ruling from an ground-level people's court in the place where the object of the application resides, or where the property is located. Therefore, "People's court" in article 23 of CIETAC Arbitration Rule includes both intermediate people's court and ground-level people's court in its meaning. Second, in the cases that the party concerned submits arbitration to CIETAC, it is not permitted for the party to ask the people's court for custody of property before submitting an arbitration. But there still can be the urgent cases that interests of the party concerned are at stake, and legitimate rights and interests of the party concerned may be damaged beyond remedy, if no application for custody of property is filed immediately. In that cases, even if the party may apply for custody of property with the people's court after submitting an arbitration, it might be too late to preserve property. Therefore, Chinese laws and rules have to be revised so that the party may ask the people's court for custody of property before submitting an arbitration. When revising laws and rules, according to the today's legislation trends, it must be considered that court and arbitration tribunal both have a right to decide the custody of property. When arbitration tribunal decides it, the procedural provisions executing it must be provided. It is also required that China permit to apply preservation of evidence as well as custody of property before submitting an arbitration. It is also strongly recommended that China permit custody of property or preservation of evidence even in the cases that an arbitration is submitted to the arbitration institute which is located in foreign country, not in China.

• 한국관광식음료학회지:관광식음료경영연구
• /
• 제7권
• /
• pp.7-39
• /
• 1997

Many of legislations related to tourism has been made up to now since the year 1961 when modern tourism studies started. In restropect of the year 1988, the year 2002 is expected to be another chance for tourism. In order to take this chance again, new laws and regulations are necessary. Therefore, the object of this study are decided as follows: 1) to put 'the right to go sightseeing' in statutory form at constitution. 2) to realise the private law of tourism 3) to make the environment law of tourism 4) to make the facility law of tourism 5) to make the transportation law of tourism 6) to make the cultural property law of tourism 7) to make the food law of tourism 8) to make the related law of tourism 9) to make the advertising law of tourism, the tax law of tourism, and the economy law of tourism As tourism laws like above exist, tourism industry would be developed more than now.

• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.99-111
• /
• 1999

The object of this study is to get the superior double hull structure to its crashworthiness against collision comparing absorbed energy capacities of its various types with each other, varying material properties, collision positions and velocities, and structural arrangements such as double hull width, web and stringer spaces, etc. Local absorbed energy capacities, failure behaviors and damage extents of their members are also considered during collision in addition to the estimations of their global ones. This paper describes a series of numerical simulations of collisions between DWT 45,000 oil tanker(struck ship) and DWT 10,500 rigid one(striking ships) using Hydrocode LS/DYNA3D. Collisions are assumed to occur at the middle of struck ship with striking one moving at right angle to its centerline. The following remarks were obtained through this study: More flexible the double hull structure is, much superior its crashworthiness against collision is. The increment of double hull width does not give much influence than other factors do. The exact use of material property such as failure strain is also important on the numerical simulation of collision.