• 제목/요약/키워드: neoadjuvant therapy

검색결과 133건 처리시간 0.033초

The Current Evidence on Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Oh, Dongryul;Kim, Jong Hoon
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • 제53권4호
    • /
    • pp.160-167
    • /
    • 2020
  • Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy is recommended to improve survival, based on the results of several randomized trials and meta-analyses. However, controversy remains regarding how to combine surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Moreover, in East Asia, the predominant histological type is esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, which has a different epidemiology and tumor biology from esophageal or gastroesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma. As such, the management of esophageal cancer in East Asia seems to be different from that in Western countries. Thus, this article reviews the current evidence on neoadjuvant therapy and considers the optimal combinations and ongoing strategies of multimodal therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Adjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Sun, Jong-Mu
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • 제53권4호
    • /
    • pp.168-171
    • /
    • 2020
  • Adjuvant therapy for completely resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is less commonly applied in clinical practice than neoadjuvant therapy, but it plays a substantial role in improving survival for esophageal cancer patients. This article presents a concise review of the evidence regarding adjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and future directions, particularly immunotherapy.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Evolving role of neoadjuvant and targeted therapy

  • Michael Ghio;Adarsh Vijay
    • 한국간담췌외과학회지
    • /
    • 제27권2호
    • /
    • pp.123-130
    • /
    • 2023
  • Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive, often fatal, malignancy that arises from the bile ducts. As it often presents with metastatic disease, surgery has limited utility. However, in some cases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has provided the necessary reduction in tumor burden to allow for adequate resection. Consequently, new advances in neoadjuvant chemoradiation and targeted therapy are of interest with numerous case reports and small series published routinely; it is challenging to present a large case series or study given the overall rare frequency with which this malignancy is seen. Herein, we aim to summarize the newest advances in both neoadjuvant chemotherapy and targeted immunotherapy.

Radiological Downstaging with Neoadjuvant Therapy in Unresectable Gall Bladder Cancer Cases

  • Agrawal, Sushma;Mohan, Lalit;Mourya, Chandan;Neyaz, Zafar;Saxena, Rajan
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제17권4호
    • /
    • pp.2137-2140
    • /
    • 2016
  • Background: Gall bladder cancer (GBC) usually presents as unresectable or metastatic disease. We conducted a feasibility study to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) on radiologic downstaging and resectability in unresectable GBC cases. Materials and Methods: Patients with locally advanced disease were treated with chemoradiotherapy [CTRT] ( external radiotherapy (45Gy) along with weekly concurrent cisplatin $35mg/m^2$ and 5-FU 500 mg) and those with positive paraaortic nodes were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [NACT (cisplatin $25mg/m^2$ and gemcitabine $1gm/m^2$ day 1 and 8, 3 weekly for 3 cycles). Radiological assessment was according to RECIST criteria by evaluating downstaging of liver involvement and lymphadenopathy into complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Results: A total of 40 patients were evaluated from January 2012 to December 2014 (CTRT=25, NACT=15). Pretreatment CT scans revealed involvement of hilum (19), liver infiltration (38), duodenum involvement (n=22), colon involvement (n=11), N1 involvement (n=11), N2 disease (n=8), paraaortic LN (n=15), and no lymphadenopathy (n=6). After neoadjuvant therapy, liver involvement showed CR in 11(30%), PR in 4 (10.5%), SD in 15 (39.4%) and lymph node involvement showed CR in 17 (50%), PR in 6 (17.6%), SD in 4 (11.7 %). Six patients (CTRT=2, NACT=4) with 66.6 % and 83% downstaging of liver and lymphnodes respectively underwent extended cholecystectomy. There was 16.6 % and 83.3% rates of histopathological CR of liver and lymph nodes. All resections were R0. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy in unresectable gall bladder cancer results in a 15% resectability rate. This approach has a strong potential in achieving R0 and node negative disease. Radiologic downstaging (CR+PR) of liver involvement is 40.5% and lymphadenopathy is 67.5%. Nodal regression could serve as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant therapy.

Dancing with the Surgeon: Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Immunotherapies from the Medical Oncologist's Perspective

  • Sehhoon Park
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • 제56권2호
    • /
    • pp.67-74
    • /
    • 2023
  • Perioperative treatment with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has proven clinical benefits in terms of achieving a higher overall survival (OS) rate. With its success in the palliative treatment of NSCLC, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has now become an essential component of treatment, even as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy in patients with operable NSCLC. Both pre- and post-surgery ICB applications have proven clinical efficacy in preventing disease recurrence. In addition, neoadjuvant ICB combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy has shown a significantly higher rate of pathologic regression of viable tumors compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy alone. To confirm this, an early signal of OS benefit has been shown in a selected population, with programmed death ligand 1 expression ≥50%. Furthermore, applying ICB both pre- and post-surgery enhances its clinical benefits, as is currently under evaluation in ongoing phase III trials. Simultaneously, as the number of available perioperative treatment options increases, the variables to be considered for making treatment decisions become more complex. Thus, the role of a multidisciplinary team-based treatment approach has not been fully emphasized. This review presents up-to-date pivotal data that lead to practical changes in managing resectable NSCLC. From the medical oncologist's perspective, it is time to dance with surgeons to decide on the sequence of systemic treatment, particularly the ICB-based approach, accompanying surgery for operable NSCLC.

진행성 위암에서의 항암요법에 대하여 (Palliative and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients)

  • 문희석
    • Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
    • /
    • 제2권2호
    • /
    • pp.45-51
    • /
    • 2014
  • Gastric cancer is the second most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Korea. Many cases of gastric cancer are detected in the early stages on standard medical examinations; complete surgical and endoscopic resection is the most recommended treatment for early-stage gastric cancer. Nevertheless, many patients have already progressed to advanced gastric cancer (AGC) upon diagnosis, and the prognosis of such patients is very poor. Combination chemotherapy has been shown to produce a better quality of life (QOL) and to increase overall survival in AGC patients. However, approximately 50% of patients do not respond to the current first-line chemotherapy, while most patients who do respond eventually show disease progression. Accordingly, various second-line regimens have been investigated, and active salvage chemotherapy has been shown to improve the QOL and clinical outcomes in select AGS patients who can tolerate it. There is also an increasing need for neoadjuvant therapy for treating gastric cancer; therefore, various clinical trials have been set up to investigate different regimens. Neoadjuvant therapy is currently established as the standard treatment for locally AGC in Europe; it has contributed to lowering the nodal stages and has reduced overall mortality rates. Despite these benefits, many uncertainties remain. Therefore, further prospective, high quality randomized controlled trials for neoadjuvant therapies are needed to clarify their clinical benefits and to establish the most effective treatment strategies for AGC.

  • PDF

진행된 병기의 비인강암에서의 선행보조 항암화학요법과 방사선치료 (Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Advanced Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma)

  • 홍세미;우홍균;박찬일
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • 제17권4호
    • /
    • pp.275-280
    • /
    • 1999
  • 목 적 :국소적으로 진행된 비인두암환자에서 선행보조 항암화학요법의 실행 용이성과 부작용의 정도를 평가한다. 대상 및 방법 : 77명의 조직학적으로 비인두암으로 확진 되고 이전에 치료를 받은 적이 없는 진행된 병기의 비인두암 환자들이 1984년부터 1996년까지 서울대학교병원에서 선행보조 항암화학요법과 방사선치료를 시행 받았다. 환자군의 병기분포는 다음과 같다. 1992년 AJCC 분류법에 따라 제 3 병기에 속하는 환자가 2명이었고 제 4병기에 속하는 환자가 75명이었다. 방사선치료 시행 전에 선행보조 항암화학요법으로 66명의 환자가 5-FU와 Cisplatin의 정맥 내 투여를 시행 받았고, 11명의 환자가 5-FU와 Carboplatin의 정맥 내 투여를 시행 받았다. 생존환자의 중앙추적기간은 44개월이었다. 결 과 :항암화학요법에의 반응율은 87$\%$였다. 항암화학요법의 부작용은 심하지 않았다. 3명의 환자만이 3도의 부작용을 경험하였다. 1명은 백혈구 감소증을 보였고 2명은 오심과 구토의 부작용을 보였다. 방사선에 의한 점막염도 심하지 않았는데, 10명의 환자에서 2도의 점막염이 발생하였다. 5년 생존율과 5년 무병생존율은 각각 68$\%$와 65$\%$였다. 5년 무원격전이율은 82$\%$였으며 5년 국소 치유율은 75$\%$였다. 결 론 : 선행보조 항암화학요법이 진행된 병기의 비인두암 환자에 있어서 부작용을 크게 증가시키지 않으면서 효과적인 치료방법임을 알 수 있었다.

  • PDF

췌장 선암의 절제 가능성 평가 (Radiologic Evaluation for Resectability of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma)

  • 황신혜;박미숙
    • 대한영상의학회지
    • /
    • 제82권2호
    • /
    • pp.315-334
    • /
    • 2021
  • 췌장 선암의 발견, 진단, 절제 가능성 평가, 병기 설정 및 치료 방침 결정에 영상 검사는 중요한 역할을 담당하고 있다. 최근에는 진단 당시 경계절제성 혹은 국소 진행성 췌장암을 진단 받은 경우 선행 보조 치료 또는 완화 치료 후 가능하면 근치적 절제술을 고려할 것이 권고된다. 이 종설에서는 췌장 선암의 절제 가능성 평가, 원격 전이의 진단 및 선행 보조 치료 또는 완화 치료 후 절제 가능성을 재평가할 때 영상 검사의 해석, 판독 기준 및 고려할 사항에 대하여 설명하고자 한다.

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Three Different Neoadjuvant Approaches (Chemotherapy Combined Vaginal Intracavitary Irradiation, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Alone or Radiotherapy) Combined with Surgery for Patients with Stage Ib2 and IIa2 Cervical Cancer

  • Fu, Jian-Hong;Gao, Zhan;Ren, Chen-Chen;Shi, Yong-Gang
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제14권4호
    • /
    • pp.2377-2381
    • /
    • 2013
  • A total of 285 patients with stage Ib2 and IIa2 cervical cancer were categorized into three groups, and received preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with vaginal intracavitary irradiation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone or radiotherapy, respectively. The effective rate of 70.6 % in group 1 was much higher than 41.4% in group 2 (P=0.000) and 46.9 % in group 3 (P=0.000); The percentage of patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy was 44.1% in group 1, much lower than 67.8% in group 2 (P=0.001) and 64.6% in group 3 (P=0.004); The percentage of patients with no postoperative risk factor in group 1 was 52.0%, much higher than 32.2% in group 2 (P=0.006) and 35.4% in group 3 (P=0.019); The occurrence rate of surgery-related complications in groups 1, 2 and 3 were 29.4%, 28.7%, and 33.3%, respectively, with no statistical differences among the groups (P=0.981). Regarding preoperative neoadjuvant complications, none were obvious in group 3, while occurrence rates of myelosuppression in groups 1 and 2 were 89.1% and 86.6%, of nausea and vomitting were 78.4% and 78.2%, but without significant differences (all P>0.05). Among 166 patients who received postoperative adjuvant therapy in the three groups, the occurrence rates were: 65.4%, 64.3% and 61.1% respectively for myelosuppression; 42.3%, 38.1%, and 38.9% for nausea and vomiting; 9.6%, 9.5% and 9.7% for urocystitis; and 63.5%, 69.0% and 65.3% enteritis and rectitis. There were no statistically significant differences among them (all P>0.05). The five-year disease-free survival rates (DFS) in groups 1, 2, 3 were 78.3%, 75.1%, 80.9%, respectively; the five-year overall survival rates (OS) were 81.4%, 78.2%, and 81.1%, respectively. The five-year OS of 166 patients receiving postoperative in the three groups were 72.4%, 69.5%, and 71.8%, respectively, with no significant variation (all P>0.05). Although there were no differences among three groups in DFS and OS, preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with intracavitary radiotherapy may increase the effective rate and the percentage of patients with no postoperative risk factors and decrease the percentage of patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy, thereby decreasing complications indirectly and increasing quality of life.

Neoadjuvant Treatment for Gastric Cancer

  • Schuhmacher, Christoph;Reim, Daniel;Novotny, Alexander
    • Journal of Gastric Cancer
    • /
    • 제13권2호
    • /
    • pp.73-78
    • /
    • 2013
  • Surgery is still considered to be the mainstay for the treatment of localized gastric cancer with negative margins (R0-resection) and an adequate lymph-node-dissection (D2-lymphadenectomy). Unfortunately, most cases of gastric cancer are only diagnosed at an advanced stage due to frequent recurrences after primary resection in curative intent. In order to improve prognosis after curative resection, in the recent past, patients with locally advanced tumors were subjected to a pre-, peri-, or postoperative treatment. Interestingly, postoperative chemotherapy has significantly improved survival after gastric resection in Asia, adjuvant radiochemotherapy is favored in North America and perioperative chemotherapy is considered as a treatment of choice in Europe indicating region specific approach towards the treatment. Recently there has also been growing evidence of positive outcomes of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy on patient survival. In the present article, we discuss the concepts of neoadjuvant treatment approach and provide recommendations to surgeons based on current evidence.