• 중국학논총
• /
• no.71
• /
• pp.61-81
• /
• 2021

作爲使用頻率較高的副詞, "皆"和"都"分別代表了古代漢語和現代漢語中的兩類總括範圍副詞. 這兩類總括範圍副詞之間, 不是簡單的詞彙替代, 而是一種系統的變化. 通過語義指向, 焦點, 與否定副詞的連用情況的考察, 我們發現"皆", "盡", "都"存在一定的差異, 而且得出了"都"對"皆", "盡"的功能進行了基本結論. 這個演變從深層結構上說, 是各自的語義焦點的差異. "都"之所以能夠取代"皆", "盡", 成爲現代漢語主要的總括範圍副詞, 是因爲它在語義上不僅像"皆"那樣統括的範圍之內的個體在動作行爲或者性狀上的一致性, 也不僅像"盡"那樣強調指向對象的無例外, 而是這兩者的綜合.

• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.52
• /
• pp.393-416
• /
• 2018

Negative Stripping Construction in English involves the disjunction but, the adverb not, and a constituent NP. This construction is an incomplete sentence although it delivers a complete sentential meaning. Interpretation of this construction may be ambiguous in that the constituent NP can either be construed as the subject, or as the complements including the object. To generate such sentences and resolve the issue of ambiguity, we propose a construction-based analysis under direct interpretation approach, rejecting previous analyses based on deletion approaches. In so doing, we suggest a negative stripping construction rule that can account for ambiguous meaning. This rule further can enable us to explain syntactic structures and readings of Negative Stripping Construction.