• Title/Summary/Keyword: multi bounded discrete choice

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

Measuring Consumers' Value of the Functional Processing Diet Rice Using the CVM and Marketing Strategy (기능성 다이어트 쌀의 소비자 가치평가와 마케팅 전략)

  • 이순석;오상헌;조성주;조재규;정호근
    • Food Science and Preservation
    • /
    • v.10 no.2
    • /
    • pp.169-174
    • /
    • 2003
  • This study is to estimate consumers' value of the functional processing diet rice using the multi bounded discrete choice CVM. The results is shown that householders are willing to pay 2,637won/kg, 2,983won/kg and 3,428won/kg(definitely, sure, not sure) for buying the the functional processing diet rice. Results also show that the estimate of the aggregated buying value of the functional processing diet rice is approximately 2,239 billion won in the definitely scenario in Seoul province. The marketing strategy of the functional processing diet rice is divided by the on line and off line marketing.

Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation under Alternative Approaches for Incorporating Respondent Uncertainty (지불의사 유도방식에 따른 온실가스 배출 감축의 편익 비교 분석)

  • Kim, Chung-Sil;Lee, Sang-Ho
    • Journal of Environmental Policy
    • /
    • v.8 no.3
    • /
    • pp.163-180
    • /
    • 2009
  • This study attempts to investigate the preference uncertainty of respondents involved in stating their Willingness to Pay (WTP). For the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) survey, we employed two approaches using two split samples. The respondents of one sample were given the opportunity to express intensity of preference through Multi-bounded Discrete Choice (MBDC) WTP questions, while those in the other sample were given Dichotomous Choice (DC) WTP questions. By incorporating the two elicited degrees of preference uncertainty into examining the WTP responses, we compared the two approaches. In comparing the DC model with the MBDC model, the mean WTP for the DC model was similar to PRYES in the MBDC Model. We concluded that the MBDC model estimates the various mean WTP while considering the preference uncertainty.

  • PDF