• 한국신뢰성학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국신뢰성학회 2001년도 정기학술대회
• /
• pp.277-278
• /
• 2001

The successful operation of a product In service depends upon the effective provision of logistic support in order to achieve and maintain the required levels of performance and customer satisfaction. Logistic support encompasses the activities and facilities required to maintain a product (hardware and software) in service. Logistic support covers maintenance, manpower and personnel, training, spares, technical documentation and packaging handling, storage and transportation and support facilities.The cost of logistic support is often a major contributor to the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) of a product and increasingly customers are making purchase decisions based on lifecycle cost rather than initial purchase price alone. Logistic support considerations can therefore have a major impact on product sales by ensuring that the product can be easily maintained at a reasonable cost and that all the necessary facilities have been provided to fully support the product in the field so that it meets the required availability. Quantification of support costs allows the manufacturer to estimate the support cost elements and evaluate possible warranty costs. This reduces risk and allows support costs to be set at competitive rates.Integrated Logistic Support (ILS) is a management method by which all the logistic support services required by a customer can be brought together in a structured way and In harmony with a product. In essence the application of ILS:- causes logistic support considerations to be integrated into product design;- develops logistic support arrangements that are consistently related to the design and to each other;- provides the necessary logistic support at the beginning and during customer use at optimum cost.The method by which ILS achieves much of the above is through the application of Logistic Support Analysis (LSA). This is a series of support analysis tasks that are performed throughout the design process in order to ensure that the product can be supported efficiently In accordance with the requirements of the customer.The successful application of ILS will result in a number of customer and supplier benefits. These should include some or all of the following:- greater product uptime;- fewer product modifications due to supportability deficiencies and hence less supplier rework;- better adherence to production schedules in process plants through reduced maintenance, better support;- lower supplier product costs;- Bower customer support costs;- better visibility of support costs;- reduced product LCC;- a better and more saleable product;- Improved safety;- increased overall customer satisfaction;- increased product purchases;- potential for purchase or upgrade of the product sooner through customer savings on support of current product.ILS should be an integral part of the total management process with an on-going improvement activity using monitoring of achieved performance to tailor existing support and influence future design activities. For many years, ILS was predominantly applied to military procurement, primarily using standards generated by the US Government Department of Defense (DoD). The military standards refer to specialized government infrastructures and are too complex for commercial application. The methods and benefits of ILS, however, have potential for much wider application in commercial and civilian use. The concept of ILS is simple and depends on a structured procedure that assures that logistic aspects are fully considered throughout the design and development phases of a product, in close cooperation with the designers. The ability to effectively support the product is given equal weight to performance and is fully considered in relation to its cost.The application of ILS provides improvements in availability, maintenance support and longterm 3ogistic cost savings. Logistic costs are significant through the life of a system and can often amount to many times the initial purchase cost of the system.This study provides guidance on the minimum activities necessary to Implement effective ILS for a wide range of commercial suppliers. The guide supplements IEC60106-4, Guide on maintainability of equipment Part 4: Section Eight maintenance and maintenance support planning, which emphasizes the maintenance aspects of the support requirements and refers to other existing standards where appropriate. The use of Reliability and Maintainability studies is also mentioned in this study, as R&M is an important interface area to ILS.

• 한국산업정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국산업정보학회 2000년도 춘계학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.135-143
• /
• 2000

COCOMO II 모델은 비순차적이며, 빠른 개발방법 과정 등의 새로운 소프트웨어 생명주기에 적합한 비용 모델이다. COCOMO II 모델에서 조율 방법으로 널리 사용된 최소자승 회귀분석 방법은 소프트웨어공학 데이터 셀과 가정이 위배되는 점이 있다 즉, 원시자료는 특히 서로 다른 개발조직으로부터 비용인자 등급, 노력, 크기가 수집되며 부정확하고 이상치가 존재한다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 한계를 극복하기 위하여 우리는 COCOMO II 모델을 가지고 상대오차를 최소화하는 모델 조율에 대한 새로운 방법을 제안한다. 제안된 방법의 특징은 이상치를 갖는 원시 데이터에 덜 민감한 특성을 갖고 있다. 실험결과, 제안된 새로운 조율방법 MRE가 조정된 결정계수(adj-$R^2$), 표준편차(^$\sigma$), 예측 정도( PRED(L))에서 기존의 전통적 회귀분석 방법보다 우수하게 나타났다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제46권
• /
• pp.29-60
• /
• 2010

The incentive and reasons to publish FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Design, Build and Operate Projects(DBO Form) are manifold. It is partly a response to the increasing need for sophisticated project delivery methods in both the public and private sectors and the already widespread use of the FIDIC Yellow Book with operation and maintenance obligations and partly a response to the challenge to decrease maintenance cost to a minimum by means of a new procurement route. As a result, FIDIC has developed a new model form to meet this market place requirement. On the other hand, FIDIC did not simply adapt the Yellow Book but has developed a new form from it, whilst preserving the style of the already known FIDIC Forms and maintaining the wording where it was not necessary to change it for the purposes of a DBO Form. Moreover DBO Form fills up supposed gaps in other FIDIC Forms and ameliorates the claim management and dispute management framework. FIDIC DBO approach may be shortly summarized as follows. First, DBO Form provides for single project responsibility. Second, DBO Form has the clear objective of ensuring the use of a most reliable and efficient technology at the lowest life-cycle cost. Third, DBO Form is intended to operate as an effective quality increase in the design and construction of projects. Fourth, DBO Form is intended to provide significant benefits with regard to system integration and reduction of risks. Fifth, DBO Form accelerates and enhances completion schedule compliance. Sixth, DBO takes care of all three supporting pillars of sustainability(including economical, environmental and social elements). DBO Form is obviously a good starting point for negotiations and the preparation of calls for tenders, thus saving the parties time and money. However, existing cultural and legal differences, particular local conditions and the particular needs of some branches of the industry may require the form to be adapted according to the particular needs of a project. And Civil law practitioners are strongly recommended to verify carefully the underlying legal concepts and background of each clause of the General Conditions in order to avoid unnecessary and sometimes unnatural changes and amendments being made. Note that when preparing the Particular Conditions ensure that terminology is consistent and that existing inherent concepts should not be ignored.

• 자원리싸이클링
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2023

폐플라스틱에 대한 국가 간 수출입 제한에 따라, 폐플라스틱의 국내 처리 및 재활용 방안을 모색할 필요성이 커지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 국내 A 기업의 폐필름 발생 현황 및 운영 정보를 참고하여 가구 표면 마감용 sheet 및 edge 제조시 발생하는 PET·OPP 합성 폐필름의 재활용사업에 대한 비용 편익을 분석하였다. 폐플라스틱 처리는 그간 영세업체에 맡겨져 현황 파악이 어렵고 수익성 담보가 되지 않아, 재활용 기술이 있더라도 활용되기에 어려움이 따랐다. 본 연구에서는 폐플라스틱 물질 재활용 방안의 하나로써, 폐필름 발생 사업장에서 PET·OPP 합성 폐필름을 박리하여 폐PET 재활용이 이루어지는 것으로 가정하되, 재활용 비율은 정부가 「전주기 탈 플라스틱 대책」에서 제시한 수치를 활용하여 2%, 10%, 20%, 30% 재활용할 경우 비용편익을 분석하였다. 본 연구에서는 폐PET 재활용 방안으로 물리적 박리 기술이 도입되는 것으로 가정하여 폐PET 재활용 비율에 따른 비용편익분석을 수행하였다. 그 결과 폐PET의 재활용 비율이 30% 이상일 경우에만, 비용 편익비율(Benefit-cost ration, BCR)이 BCR ≥1 에 해당하여 최소비용 편익비율을 충족하는 것으로 나타났으며 이 때, BCR 값은 1.32였다. 향후 정부의 지원금 할당비율과 단가가 상향될 것으로 예상됨에 따라 비용 편익비율은 더욱 높아질 것으로 사료된다. 해당 사례는 유사 업종의 사업장에 폐PET 재활용 및 수익 창출을 위한 시범 Case가 될 것으로 기대된다.