• 지능정보연구
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.207-235
• /
• 2022

지식과 정보산업이 경제의 주축인 지식기반 사회에 있어 지식의 공유와 확산 및 체계적인 관리는 국가 경쟁력 향상뿐만 아니라 지속 가능한 사회 발전의 필수 전략으로 인식되고 있다. 정보기술과 경영의 융합이 다양한 방식으로 일어나고 있는 정보시스템(Information Systems: IS) 연구분야에서, 연구자들이 서로 협력하여 오래된 지식을 과학적 지식네트워크의 관점에서 새로운 지식으로 만들어 낼 때 비로소 지식의 진화가 일어난다. 특히, 인용과 공저, 키워드와 같은 네트워크 기반의 학제적 접목을 통해 해당 연구분야의 관심 주제와 적용된 방법론, 연구동향 등을 파악함으로써 새로운 통찰을 이끌어낼 수 있다. 선행연구에서는 연구주제와 방법론, 공동저자 등의 관계를 밝혀 해당 커뮤니티의 지식체계 구조와 연구동향을 파악하려는 다양한 시도가 있어 왔으나, 두 개 이상의 저널을 일부 기간으로 한정해서 비교한 연구가 대부분을 차지하였으며, IS 연구의 전 역사를 아우르면서 연구동향을 살펴본 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 IS 연구분야에서 관련 지식을 넓히는 데 주도적인 역할을 수행하고 있는 MIS Quarterly (MISQ) 저널을 중심으로 창간호(1977년)부터 최근(2022년 1분기)까지 게재된 모든 논문으로부터 (1) 키워드를 추출하고, (2) 추출된 키워드를 연구주제와 방법론, 이론 등으로 각각 구분한 후, (3) 토픽모델링과 키워드 네트워크 분석을 활용하여 IS 연구분야의 태동부터 현재까지의 변화 양상을 연대기적으로 파악하였다. 본 연구를 통해 MISQ에 게재된 IS 연구의 변화 양상을 살펴봄으로써, IS 연구분야의 발전 방향을 예측하고, IS 분야의 연구자들에게 새로운 연구방향을 제시하여 미래 지향적인 연구를 진행하는 데 실질적인 도움을 줄 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 대한기관윤리심의기구협의회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.23-31
• /
• 2020

Purpose: To obtain opinions from Korean Institutional Review Board (IRB) members' self-evaluation on ability to conduct fairness review of clinical trial protocol with presence of conflict of interest and from investigators and IRB members on financial conflict of interest through surveying. Methods: IRB members and researchers in 9 different hospitals were asked to answer survey questions via email. Results: Responders were 115 personnel (IRB Chair/vice 18, medical member 30, non-medical member 28, and researcher 39) from 9 centers. Compared to IRB medical members, IRB chair/vice respondents scored higher with statistically significance on 10 point scale (8.44±1.381 vs. 7.30±1.685, p=0.005) when asked to self-evaluate fairness reviewing a protocol proposed by an investigator from the same department and a protocol from the company that supports the scientific committee of responders. When reviewing a protocol proposed by a hospital director, non-medical members scored statistically significantly higher than medical-members (7.47±1.76 vs. 8.07±2.70, p=0.034). When asked about the limitation of labor fee for principal investigator on phase 3 Human clinical trials of the Investigational new drug, while the responses range was wide, 60% answered that labor cost of principal investigator should be less than 30% of total budget for clinical trials with a budget of 100 million won. 51.3% answered that there is no need to disclose the labor cost of the principal investigator in the consent form. Since every investigator can be influenced unconsciously by conflict of interest, the answer that 'responder agrees that there is need for management' was the most chosen answer (IRB member 61.8%, investigator 64.1%, multiple answers allowed). Conclusion: Considering scores on questions of fairness by IRB members were between 7.23-8.56 on scale of 0 to 10 point when IRB members were asked about reviewing a clinical trial protocol, it cannot be said with absolute certainty that there is no issue regarding fairness in the review process. Therefore, there should be more ways to safeguard fairness for these issues. There is a need that the disclosure amount of honorarium from sponsor should be lower than 100 million Korean won. Considering the results of the survey in which respondents expressed their thoughts, it is likely that more education on the concept of conflict of interest is needed.

• 대한한의학회지
• /
• 제45권1호
• /
• pp.182-201
• /
• 2024

Objectives: This study was conducted to develop a standard acupotomy consent form that takes into account the unique characteristics of Korean Medicine. The study was motivated by the increasing importance of patient autonomy and the growing number of legal disputes related to medical malpractice in the clinical field of Korean Medicine. Methods: The analysis phase of the study involved a survey of the current status of acupotomy consent forms in Korean Medicine hospitals nationwide. The items of each form were analyzed based on the contents of the Medical law and the standard contract for medical procedures of the Fair Trade Commission (FTC). In the development and evaluation phase, the items and contents of the acupotomy consent form were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale and content validity was assessed through two rounds of Delphi surveys. In the improvement phase, the contents of the consent form were revised based on the results of a survey of inpatient and outpatient patients in the Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion at Pusan National University Korean Medicine Hospital, and real-time online meeting. The final version of the standard acupotomy consent form was completed after undergoing proofreading and corrections by a linguistics expert. Results: Only 30% of Korean Medicine hospitals have implemented acupotomy consent forms. The items of the consent forms did not fully include the items presented in the Medical act and the standard contract for medical procedures of the FTC. To address this issue, two rounds of Delphi surveys and a real-time discussion were conducted with a panel of 12 experts on 27 preliminary items of consent forms. The items and contents that met the criteria for content validity ratio, convergence, and consensus were derived. Based on the derived items and content, a standard acupotomy consent form was developed. Conclusions: The standard consent form for acupotomy is anticipated to ensure patient autonomy and enhance transparency and liability in acupotomy. Furthermore, it is expected to serve as evidence in case of medical disputes related to acupotomy and contribute as a reference document for the development of standard consents forms for various procedures of Korean Medicine. However, the limitations of the study include that the survey of consent forms was limited to only training hospitals of Korean Medicine, and the standard consent form is only applicable to adults in Korea. Future studies are needed to address these limitations.