• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제33권7호
• /
• pp.469-476
• /
• 2009

Recent collapse of shipping market right after unprecedent surge clearly demonstrates that shipping industry is extremely risky. Due to the volatile movements of the freight rates, investors tend to ask higher rate of return; higher required return reduces the total net present value of the investment project. For several decades, the Discounted Cash Flow(DCF hereafter) analysis has been the most frequently used valuation technique. However, the main problem of the DCF analysis is its assumption that the discount rate would stay the same during the project life. In other words, it usually does not address the decisions that managers have after a project has been accepted. The purpose of this study is investigate a new valuation method of investment: the Real Option Analysis(ROA hereafter) on ship investment. By replacing the existing valuation methods with the new one, the research will present a new perspective on investment with uncertainty. While uncertainty increases risk of investment and consequently discounts the value of it in the traditional feasibility analysis, in the ROA, a new valuation method which will be addressed in the research, uncertainty means some additional value of flexibility so that the tool can help investors produce more accurate decisions. Contrary to the DCF analysis, the ROA takes managerial flexibilities into account. In reality, capital budgeting and project management is typically dynamic, rather than static in nature. The ROA finds and assesses the values of managerial flexibilities or real options in the investments. The main structures of the research will be as follows: (1) overview of the ship investment project, (2) evaluation of the project by the Net Present Value analysis, (3) evaluation of the same project by the Real Option Analysis, (4) comparision of the two techniques.

• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.149-168
• /
• 2007

IT 투자성과의 정량화에 대한 필요성이 높아짐에 따라 학계와 연구단체에서 IT 투자성과의 화폐가치 전환 및 정량적 평가를 위한 다양한 측정방법들을 개발하여 제시하고 있으며, 이들 기법을 활용하여 IT 투자성과를 정량적으로 평가하는 기업들이 점차 늘고 있다. 그러나 이와 같은 IT 투자성과의 정량적 평가 기법을 도입한 기업의 실무자들은 화폐가치로 전환되어 도출된 결과들이 가시적으로 확인될 수 있는 것이 아니기 때문에 IT가 제공하는 실 효과를 제대로 반영하여 평가되었는지에 대하여 확신하지 못하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 IT 투자성과의 정량적 평가 결과를 기존의 많은 연구를 통해 IT 투자성과의 정성적인 평가로 입증된 사용자 만족도로써 설명이 가능한지 파악하여 보기 위하여 기업의 사례 분석을 통해 그 상관관계를 분석하였다. 사례 연구 결과, 다음과 같은 시사점을 도출하였다. 첫째, 정보화 효과금액은 사용자 만족도와 상관관계가 있다. 둘째, 합리적인 정보화 효과금액의 도출을 위해서는 조직 내에서 시스템의 효과를 정량화할 수 있는 지표 개발 및 화폐전환 데이터의 관리가 중요하다. 셋째, IT ROI는 시스템 간의 성과를 비교하는 것에는 부적절하며 개별 시스템의 성과 및 효율성 측정 기준으로 사용하는 것이 적절하다. 넷째, 정량적 평가가 여전히 시스템의 전략적인 부분 등에 대한 평가에는 미흡하기 때문에 이를 보완하기 위한 방법으로 사용자 만족도를 함께 사용하는 것이 바람직하다.

• 대한전기학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한전기학회 2003년도 하계학술대회 논문집 A
• /
• pp.384-386
• /
• 2003

Striking in change that present our country is much by electricity industry reform and the Korea Electric Power Corporation is deciding power distribution system reliability indices every year but power distribution system for reliability evaluation and establishment of investment program are consisting punily. If consider efficient inflection of resources and hereafter power distribution division that is limited for target achievement of schedule level service evaluation and reliability side in operation of the power distribution system, can expect efficient practical use of the power distribution property if gains in electrical side about these change and most suitable investment way consist because there is necessity of electric power plan establishment of area electric power distribution place of business unit. This paper consider proper reliability level and maximum effect through quantitative analysis to gain electrical gains of the power distribution system in reliability side depending on trend DB(Data Base) of data of electric power system composition appliance in this treatise and apply data administration and reliability rate analysis that serve to decide most suitable investment precedence to supply of electric power property to power distribution system present investment algorithm.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.1-24
• /
• 2021

Purpose - We aim to verify whether CSM activities increase investment efficiency, and to verify whether the influence of CSM activities on investment efficiency is discriminatory depending on whether or not they belong to chaebol. Design/methodology/approach - Using 4,701 Korean firm-year observations over the 2011-2017 period, we used multiple regression analysis. CSM is measured by the evaluation score of the Korea Corporate Governance Service (KCGS). Findings - Our study confirms that CSM is a significantly positive relationship with investment efficiency. This shows that, as a result of CSM, the increased earnings quality acts as an incentive to increase investment efficiency. Next, in analysis of a dataset into two groups (a chaebol, non-chaebol), the results show that the relationship between CSM and investment efficiency differs among detailed indicator activities depending on whether or not they belong to chaebol. Research implications or Originality - It is significant that this study focused on and analyzed CSM as a determinant of investment efficiency, and examined the effects of whether or not it belongs to chaebol in the relationship between CSM and investment efficiency. Our results, which suggested that CSM can increase investment efficiency, are expected to provide important implications not only for managers but also for investors and supervisors.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2002년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.438-441
• /
• 2002

국내 건설산업은 지난 10여년 간 정보화에 대한 투자를 지속해 왔지만 투자에 대한 효과 검증이나 평가를 통한 피드백이 이루어지지 않아 정보화에 대한 의사결정을 지원하지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 본 연구는 건설CALS/EC 기반확산을 위한 전략의 일환으로 건설기업의 정보화 평가체계가 객관성과 현실성을 보유하기 위해 건설기업 정보화의 현 주소를 파악하여 건설기업 정보화 평가에 대한 틀을 마련하였다. IMF이전인 95년부터 현재까지의 건설기업 정보화에 대한 조사를 한 결과, 정부가 선도하는 CALS/EC의 성공적 정착을 위해서는 건설산업 구성원의 정보화가 균형 및 발전을 이룩해야 한다는 것이 본 조사의 결과 매우 시급한 현안 과제로 대두되었고, 정보화 평가 시 건설업체 역할에 따른 차별화 된 정보화 평가 지침의 필요성을 제기하였다.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.63-79
• /
• 2002

During the last decade many enterprises spent a huge amount of money for investment on Information Technology (IT) & Information System (IS) to attain competitive advantage and to maximize their business performance by satisfying the various requirements of customers. Under such circumstances, methodologies for evaluating IT impact on business performance are very important issues for strategic decision making on investment. In this study, we propose a performance evaluation model that adopts the concept of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and the Value Chain to analyze the financial impact and non-financial impact of IT & IS at each critical work area. This model combines the 4 evaluation areas from BSC and 6 critical work areas from Value Chain and measures the Key Performance Indicator (HPI) and the effect of KPI. Also, we present a case study of which the evaluation model has been conducted on a major manufacturing company. finally. we address some important notes to improve the IT & IS performances in the real-world.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국컴퓨터정보학회 2014년도 제50차 하계학술대회논문집 22권2호
• /
• pp.95-96
• /
• 2014

These information systems projects have unique characteristics such as technology sensitiveness, network effectiveness, embeddedness, and externality, these investment projects have been not taken care of in the field of administration and evaluation. Furthermore, it is not easy to evaluate the results of projects under the circumstances where the conditions for evaluation of budget, time, and data leave much to be desired. But the efficient monitoring and effective analysis of information systems are surely needed for beneficient results of investment in information systems. We propose an effect evaluation model on the basis of restriction to evaluate information systems.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국컴퓨터정보학회 2014년도 제50차 하계학술대회논문집 22권2호
• /
• pp.97-98
• /
• 2014

Lots of investment projects of new development and redevelopment for information systems have been not taken care of in the field of administration and evaluation, for these information systems projects have unique characteristics such as technology sensitiveness, network effectiveness, embeddedness, and externality. In fact, quantitative and qualitative evaluation of investments in information systems projects are not sufficient. It is critically important to generally evaluate benefits of development or operation cost, urgency, external effects, and so on. In addition, the efficient monitoring and effective analysis of information systems are surely needed for beneficient results of investment in information systems. We propose an economics evaluation model for information systems projects.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 3th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.876-882
• /
• 2009

With overall opening of global construction market by World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements, importance of management efficiency of construction industry which considers both tangible and intangible assets is recently being recognized in our nation. That is, efforts for reinforcement of competitiveness must be placed through maximization of values of internal and external intangible assets of construction industry such as management innovation, information, investment in technology and R&D and intellectual property. Accordingly in this study, evaluation criteria for intangible assets of construction industry were investigated and classified. Using such criteria, evaluation index and model were established based on the degree of importance of each criterion. The purpose of this study is to review importance of intangible assets in terms of competitiveness and management efficiency of construction industry and to provide basic data for establishment of intangible assets and revitalization of investment.

• 한국기술혁신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2000년도 추계 학술대회(The 2000 Autumn Conference of korea Technology Inovation Society)(한국기술혁신학회)
• /
• pp.259-277
• /
• 2000

In this paper, we suggest theoretical grounds on the problem of R&D portfolio with different option premiums utilizing the Real Options Model, which has received intensified attention as the method of assessment of R&D project with high risk. Even though there have been many studies focused on the evaluation of option value of single project from technology valuation's perspective. there are few study on the portfolio of multiple technology investment by option value using. This paper bears practical importance by showing simple examples with the option value of investment alternatives and the valuation of related risk, the construction of optimum portfolio in technology investment alternatives.