• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회 2004년도 The 7th korea-japan joint meeting of orthopaedic sports medicine
• /
• pp.39-39
• /
• 2004

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.104-111
• /
• 2020

Purpose: Although exchange nailing is a standard method of treating femoral shaft nonunion, various rates of healing, ranging from 72% to 100%, have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of exchange nailing in femoral shaft nonunion. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 cases of aseptic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing. The mean postsurgical period of nonunion was 66.8 weeks. A nail at least 2 mm larger in diameter was selected to replace the previous nail after reaming. Distal fixation was performed using at least two interlocking screws. The success of the procedure was determined by the finding of union on simple radiographs. Possible reasons for failure were analyzed, including the location of nonunion, the type of nonunion, and the number of screws used for distal fixation. Results: Of the 30 cases, 27 achieved primary healing with the technique of exchange nailing. The average time to achieve union was 23.1 weeks (range, 13.7-36.9 weeks). The three failures involved nonunion at the isthmic level (three of 15 cases), not at the infraisthmic level (zero of 15 cases). Of eight cases of oligotrophic nonunion, two (25%) failed to heal, and of 22 cases of hypertrophic nonunion, one (4.5%) failed to heal. Of 11 cases involving two screws at the distal fixation, two (18.2%) failed to heal, and of 19 cases involving three or more screws, one (5.3%) failed to heal. None of these findings was statistically significant. Conclusions: Exchange nailing may enable successful healing in cases of aseptic nonunion of the femoral shaft. Although nonunion at the isthmic level, oligotrophic nonunion, and weaker distal fixation seemed to be associated with a higher chance of failure, further study is needed to confirm those findings.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.65-69
• /
• 2023

The surgical approach for humeral implant failure can be challenging due to neurovascular anatomy and the possible necessity of osteosynthesis removal. We present a rare case of humeral nail bending after secondary trauma in a patient with preexistent nonunion of the humerus after intramedullary nailing. During revision surgery, the nail was sawed in half and the distal part was removed, followed by plate osteosynthesis with cable fixation to achieve absolute stability. The patient regained a full range of motion 1 year after surgery, and complete healing of the fracture was seen on imaging.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.76-81
• /
• 2016

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the data comprehensively including not only the clinical and radiographic outcomes but some parameters related to operation between the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique and intramedullary nailing (IMN) for treatment of segmental tibia shaft fractures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 31 patients (mean age, 49.3 years, range, 27-74 years), with a mean follow-up of 14.1 months (range, 12-19 months) with acute segmental tibial fractures (AO 42-C2) who underwent either surgical treatment of MIPO or IMN. In accordance with the Gustilo-Anderson classification, 11 were type I, 5 were type II, and 15 were type III. Initial compartment syndrome was confirmed in 2 cases. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in terms of the patient demographic data between the two groups. The time to definitive fixation was longer in the MIPO group (mean $13.7{\pm}10.9days$; range, 2-27) than in the intramedullary group (mean $5.4{\pm}9.6days$; range, 0-35) with statistically significant difference (p=0.002). Bony union was observed in most of cases but except 5 cases of nonunion were diagnosed (3 in the MIPO vs 2 in IMN, p=0.188). The average bone healing time was 27.1 weeks (10 to 56 weeks) in MIPO group and 23.2 weeks (13 to 66 weeks) in IMN group, respectively (p=0.056). Overall complications were 5 cases in MIPO group and 2 cases in the IMN group. Difference in LEFS was not statistically significant between both groups (p=0.824). Conclusion: This study showed that segmental tibia shaft fractures treated with both MIPO and intramadullary nailing was challenging with relatively high complication rate. A well planned sequential strategy with keeping the soft tissue and personality of fracture in mind is utmost significant as much as the choice of surgical modalities.

• 대한족부족관절학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.86-90
• /
• 2015

Purpose: We analyzed and compared the clinical and radiologic results between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and internal fixation using intramedullary (IM) nail in the treatment of distal tibia fractures. Materials and Methods: From March 2005 to June 2013, 65 cases of distal tibia fractures treated with either plate fixation or IM nail fixation were analyzed retrospectively by clinical and radiologic evaluations. The clinical results were compared using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) score at the last follow-up. The radiologic results were compared by time to bone union, complications such as nonunion, delayed union, and malunion. Results: The clinical results (according to OMAS, AOFAS score, and VAS score) were 77.47, 84.76, and 1.75, respectively, in the plating group, and 90.21, 91.00, and 1.25, respectively, in the nailing group, and there was no statistically significant difference. Plating group showed earlier union than the nailing group and the nailing group showed higher frequency of non-union and delayed union than plating group. Conclusion: In treatment of distal tibia fractures, two methods showed appropriate results. Therefore, thorough investigation of the types of fracture, state of soft tissues, and advantages and disadvantages of the two methods should be conducted in the treatment of distal tibia fractures.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.388-399
• /
• 1993

1983년 2월부터 1993년 5월까지 저자들이 interlocking IM nail정을 이용하여 치료한 경골 골절을 평균 14개월 추시하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 총 38례 중 37례에서 골유합을 이루어 97.3%의 골유합율은 보였으며 평균골유합기간은 18.7주였다. 2. 금속정의 사용 범위는 경골 간부 및 근위부나 원위부 골절에서 만족할 만한 결과를 얻었다. 3. interlocking nail은 심한 분쇄성 골절, 개방성 골절, 골소실이 있는 개방성 골절 동에서 견고한 고정을 얻을 수 있었다. 4. 불유합 및 지연유합된 경우 모두 골유합을 이루어 나사못 맞물림을 이용한 금속정 고정법은 경골 간부 골절에서 훌륭한 치료법으로 생각된다. 5. 가장 중요한 합병증은 Valgus 각형성 2례 및 varus 1례와 심부감염 1례 등이었다. 6. 금속정은 고정력이 견고하여 조기 관절운동 및 보행이 가능하여 관절 강직이나 근위축을 방지할 수 있었다.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.107-114
• /
• 2013

목적: 상완골 간부 골절에서 골수강 내 금속정 고정을 시행한 후 잔존한 전위에 대해 임상적, 방사선학적 결과를 분석하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2004년 7월부터 2011년 8월까지 상완골 간부 골절에 대해서 골수강 내 금속정 고정 후 잔존한 전위가 10 mm 이상, 20 mm 미만인 8예를 대상으로 하였다. 평균 연령은 54.1세(43~70세), 남자 3예, 여자 5예였다. 수술 직후 단순 방사선 사진으로 전위와 각형성의 정도를 측정하였으며, 추시 방사선 사진으로 이의 호전 정도와 골유합, 합병증 여부를 확인하였다. 술 후 견관절 및 주관절의 운동 범위와 통증에 대해서 조사하였다. 결과: 모든 예에서 골유합을 얻을 수 있었고, 평균 골유합 기간은 16.1주였다. 최종 추시 견관절 및 주관절의 운동범위는 대부분 정상 범위로 돌아왔다. 1예에서 견관절 강직으로 인하여 관절경적 관절낭 이완술 및 도수 조작술 후 운동범위를 회복하였으며, 일시적인 견관절 통증 1예, 주관절 통증 1예가 있었다. 2예에서 근위 나사못의 빠짐이 있었으나 모두 골유합을 얻었다. 결론: 상완골 간부 골절에서 골수강 내 금속정 고정 후 잔존한 전위에도 불구하고 골유합을 얻을 수 있었으며 우수한 임상적 결과를 보였기 때문에, 관혈적 정복 또는 추가 고정은 필요하지 않았다.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.96-102
• /
• 2018

Ipsilateral fractures of proximal femur with shaft and condylar region are very rare. Current concept of management is based on fixation of each fracture as independent entity using separate fixation modalities for proximal and distal parts of femur. However, we considered that antegrade femoral nailing with cephalomedullary screw fixation is a good option for ipsilateral multi-level femoral fractures. Here, we present an experience of satisfactory treatment for ipsilateral femoral neck fracture, subtrochanteric fracture, comminuted shaft fracture with supracondylar fracture following road traffic accident.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.91-95
• /
• 2015

Background: Our aim was to make a comparative analysis of radiological and clinical outcomes of using either one or two interlocking distal screws on a Polarus intramedullary nail for the internal fixation of humeral shaft fractures. Methods: From January 2008 to March 2014, we enrolled 26 patients with humeral shaft fractures who were operated on using intramedullary nails. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to how many interlocking distal screws were used to lock the Polarus nail: in group 1, a single interlocking distal screw was used in 12 patients; and in group 2, double interlocking distal screws, in 14 patients. We compared the degree of recovery of the displaced fracture fragments between the two groups. To compare the nonunion and shoulder function, we assessed each patient's modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgerns (ASES) score. Results: We found that 10 of 12 fractures achieved union in group 1, and 13 of 14 fractures, in group 2. We did not find a meaningful difference in the time to bone union between the two groups. The percentage of recovery of displaced fracture fragments until union was 66.9% for group 1 and 59.41% for group 2. At the final follow-up, we found that the scores for shoulder joint modified ASES was 78.7 for group 1 and 80.7 for group 2. Conclusions: Our results show that if locked appropriately, even a single screw on a Polarus nail can provide satisfactory radiological union and improved clinical outcome after intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures.

• 대한정형외과학회지
• /
• 제56권4호
• /
• pp.326-333
• /
• 2021

목적: 역행성 골수강 내 금속정은 다발성 외상 환자에서 대퇴골 간부 및 원위 대퇴골 치료에 흔히 사용되고 있다. 저자들은 역행성 골수강 내 금속정을 이용하여 치료한 35명의 환자에 대하여 치료 결과와 골유합 기간에 영향을 미치는 인자에 대한 분석을 하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 역행성 골수강 내 금속정 고정술 후 최소 12개월 이상 추시가 가능하였던 35예를 대상으로 후향적으로 분석하였다. 치료 결과와 환자의 연령과 성별, 분쇄 여부, 개방성 유무, 골절 위치, 동반 골절 유무가 골유합 기간에 미치는 영향을 비교 평가하였다. 결과: 평균 골 유합 기간은 4.5개월이었다. 3예에서 불유합이 발생하여 총 골절 치료 성공율은 91.4%였다. 골유합 기간은 연령, 성별, 골절 위치, 개방성 여부에 따른 차이가 없었으며 분쇄 여부, 동반골절 유무에 따라 차이가 있었다. 결론: 역행성 골수강 내 금속정은 대퇴 간부 및 원위부 골절 치료에 효과적 이었다. 분쇄 여부, 동반골절 유무에 따른 골유합 기간의 차이가 나타났다.