DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exchange Nailing for Aseptic Nonunion of the Femoral Shaft after Intramedullary Nailing

  • Ha, Sung-Soo (Regional Trauma Center, Kyungpook National University Hospital) ;
  • Oh, Chang-Wug (Regional Trauma Center, Kyungpook National University Hospital) ;
  • Jung, Jae-Wook (Regional Trauma Center, Kyungpook National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Joon-Woo (Regional Trauma Center, Kyungpook National University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Kyeong-Hyeon (Regional Trauma Center, Kyungpook National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Min (Regional Trauma Center, Kyungpook National University Hospital)
  • Received : 2020.03.16
  • Accepted : 2020.06.04
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: Although exchange nailing is a standard method of treating femoral shaft nonunion, various rates of healing, ranging from 72% to 100%, have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of exchange nailing in femoral shaft nonunion. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 cases of aseptic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing. The mean postsurgical period of nonunion was 66.8 weeks. A nail at least 2 mm larger in diameter was selected to replace the previous nail after reaming. Distal fixation was performed using at least two interlocking screws. The success of the procedure was determined by the finding of union on simple radiographs. Possible reasons for failure were analyzed, including the location of nonunion, the type of nonunion, and the number of screws used for distal fixation. Results: Of the 30 cases, 27 achieved primary healing with the technique of exchange nailing. The average time to achieve union was 23.1 weeks (range, 13.7-36.9 weeks). The three failures involved nonunion at the isthmic level (three of 15 cases), not at the infraisthmic level (zero of 15 cases). Of eight cases of oligotrophic nonunion, two (25%) failed to heal, and of 22 cases of hypertrophic nonunion, one (4.5%) failed to heal. Of 11 cases involving two screws at the distal fixation, two (18.2%) failed to heal, and of 19 cases involving three or more screws, one (5.3%) failed to heal. None of these findings was statistically significant. Conclusions: Exchange nailing may enable successful healing in cases of aseptic nonunion of the femoral shaft. Although nonunion at the isthmic level, oligotrophic nonunion, and weaker distal fixation seemed to be associated with a higher chance of failure, further study is needed to confirm those findings.

Keywords

References

  1. Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Evanoff B, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R. Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:161-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200103000-00003
  2. Taitsman LA, Lynch JR, Agel J, Barei DP, Nork SE. Risk factors for femoral nonunion after femoral shaft fracture. J Trauma 2009;67:1389-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318182afd0
  3. Oh JK, Bae JH, Oh CW, Biswal S, Hur CR. Treatment of femoral and tibial diaphyseal nonunions using reamed intramedullary nailing without bone graft. Injury 2008;39:952-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.02.024
  4. Park KC, Oh CW, Kim JW, Park KH, Oh JK, Park IH, et al. Minimally invasive plate augmentation in the treatment of longbone non-unions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2017;137:1523-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2773-0
  5. Brinker MR, O'Connor DP. Exchange nailing of ununited fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:177-88. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200701000-00025
  6. Pihlajamaki HK, Salminen ST, Bostman OM. The treatment of nonunions following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:394-402. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200207000-00005
  7. Yang KH, Kim JR, Park J. Nonisthmal femoral shaft nonunion as a risk factor for exchange nailing failure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;72:E60-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e318239caca
  8. Shroeder JE, Mosheiff R, Khoury A, Liebergall M, Weil YA. The outcome of closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion in the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions. J Orthop Trauma 2009;23:653-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a2a337
  9. Weber BG, Brunner C. The treatment of nonunions without electrical stimulation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;161:24-32.
  10. Swanson EA, Garrard EC, Bernstein DT, O'Connor DP, Brinker MR. Results of a systematic approach to exchange nailing for the treatment of aseptic femoral nonunions. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29:21-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000166
  11. Banaszkiewicz PA, Sabboubeh A, McLeod I, Maffulli N. Femoral exchange nailing for aseptic non-union: not the end to all problems. Injury 2003;34:349-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00191-2
  12. Watanabe Y, Takenaka N, Kobayashi M, Matsushita T. Infra-isthmal fracture is a risk factor for nonunion after femoral nailing: a case-control study. J Orthop Sci 2013;18:76-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0316-7
  13. Gabarre S, Albareda J, Gracia L, Puertolas S, Ibarz E, Herrera A. Influence of screw combination and nail materials in the stability of anterograde reamed intramedullary nail in distal femoral fractures. Injury 2017;48(Suppl 6):S47-53.
  14. Kim JW, Yoon YC, Oh CW, Han SB, Sim JA, Oh JK. Exchange nailing with enhanced distal fixation is effective for the treatment of infraisthmal femoral nonunions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2018;138:27-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2802-z
  15. Millar MJ, Wilkinson A, Navarre P, Steiner J, Vohora A, Hardidge A, et al. Nail fit: does nail diameter to canal ratio predict the need for exchange nailing in the setting of aseptic, hypertrophic femoral nonunions? J Orthop Trauma 2018;32:245-250. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001110
  16. Tsang ST, Mills LA, Frantzias J, Baren JP, Keating JF, Simpson AH. Exchange nailing for nonunion of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia: our results and an analysis of the risk factors for failure. Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:534-41.
  17. Gelalis ID, Politis AN, Arnaoutoglou CM, Korompilias AV, Pakos EE, Vekris MD, et al. Diagnostic and treatment modalities in nonunions of the femoral shaft: a review. Injury 2012;43:980-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.030