• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.85-104
• /
• 2001

A Scientometric Study SCI Impact Factors of Major Korean Medical Jernals: 1991-1999 본 연구에서는 SCI학술지가 아니라서 Journal Citation Reports(JCR)를 통하여 영향력지표 값을 쉽기 알 수 없는 학술지들의 영향력지표값을 JCR 방식으로 산출함으로서, 한국 의학 학술지들의 구체적인 학술지 평가지표를 제시하고 국제적인 위상을 객관적으로 파악하였다. 1969년부터 1998년까지 10년간 의학분야의 국내학술지 8종에 발표된 7,779편의 논문을 대상 으로 SCI검색을 하여 연도별로 인용빈도를 측정하고 1991년부터 1999년까지의 학술지 영향 력지표를 JCR과 동일한 방식으로 계량하여 분서하였다. 한글학술지 4종의 경우에는 국내학 자들이 SCI논문을 많이 발표하는 분야의 대표적인 학술지임에도 불구하고, SCI 인용을 거 의 찾아볼 수 없었다. 영문학술지 4종에 대한 SCI 인용빈도는 1994년경부터 계속 늘어나고 있으며, 특히 1997,8년경부터는 인용주기가 짧아져서 최근 2,3년간 발표된 논문에 대한 인용 이 급증하고 있고, 따라서 영향력지표값이 높아지고 있는 것은 매우 고무적이다. 한국 의학 학술지들의 10년치 영향력지표값 평균은 0.002에서 0.126까지 분포하였으며, YMJ의 1999년 도 영항력 지표값이 0.331로 가장 높았다. 한글학술지들의 영향력지표값을 같은 분야의 SCI 학술지들과 비교하여 보면, 모두 SCI 등재학술지의 최하위 영향력지표겂보다 낮았고, 영문 학술지는 대개 최하위권이어서 한국학술지의 국제적 위상은 매우 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 한 국 의학학술지 3종은 1990년대 후반 영향력지표값이 0.2 정도가 되었을 때 SCI에 등재되기 시작하였는데, 이들은 모두 영문학술지들이다. 영문으로 발행되는 현재 MEDLINE 학술지인 KJP는 1999년의 영향력지표값이 0.198로서 SCI등재 가능성이 있는 학술지로 판단된다.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.25-51
• /
• 2010

This study compares and contrasts the intellectual development of the MIS field in Korea from 2005 to 2009 to that of international trends by using a keyword co-occurrence network analysis of the two flagship journals: APJIS and MIS Quarterly. From 316 research articles in these two journals, 132 unique and most frequently co-occurred keywords were put into analysis. The results of structural equivalence show a mild correlation between APJIS and MIS Quarterly. The e-commerce, trust, and technology adoption are the high frequency keywords in both journals. In Korea e-learning, purchasing, and recommendation systems turn out to be important keywords while outsourcing, research method, quantitative method, design research, information theory, and empirical research are in average international journals. This connotes that the Korean scholarship tends to focus more on practically oriented topics, but the clustering and relational mapping of research topics in each journal show a mild level of overlap with distinctive orientations due to intrinsic disparities depending on the concerned journals' geographical scopes, namely domestic or global.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제48권1호
• /
• pp.207-225
• /
• 2017

본 연구의 목적은 키워드 특징 면에서 문헌정보 저널에서 나타나는 유사점과 차이점을 조사하여 다양한 문헌 정보학 연구 영역을 발견하는 데 있다. 이 연구를 수행하기 위해 2004 년부터 2016 년까지 네 개의 한국 저널의 키워드가 RISS 데이타베이스에서 수집 되었고(http://www.riss.co.kr) 그리고 여섯 개의 국제저널의 키워드가 SCOPUS 데이타베이스에서 수집 되었다(http://www.scopus.com). 키워드의 특징은 한국 및 국제저널에 관하여서 자주 사용 되었던 키워드와 자주 사용되었던 독특한 키워드를 검증하는 연구이었다. 독특한 키워드란 한 분야에서는 나타나지만 다른 분야에서는 나타나지 않는 키워드를 말한다. 이 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 가) 키워드 빈도 분석 결과는 한국의 문헌정보 학의 연구주제와 연구특색을 보여 주는 것으로 나타났다. 나) 일반적으로 한국 저널에서 사용 된 키워드는 도서관과 관련된 주제의 영역을 나타냈고, 국제 저널에 사용되는 키워드는 서지 측정법과 관련된 주제 영역을 나타냈다. 다) 빈번히 사용되었던 독특한 키워드에서도 이러한 전반적인 연구 테마를 명백히 나타냈다. 라) 어떤 키워드는 쓰이는 범위가 한 국가나 지역으로 한정되어 있는 것으로 나타냈다. 이 연구의 중요한 시사점은 가장 자주 사용되는 키워드와 가장 자주 사용되는 독특한 키워드는 둘 다 문헌정보 학의 주제 영역을 적절하게 반영하고 있는 것으로 보인다는 것이다.

• 연구윤리
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.1-5
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the most common misconducts in publication ethics, to demonstrate KODISA journals' management of the misconducts, and to share the findings with future and potential authors of Journal of Research and Publication Ethics (JRPE). Research design, data and methodology: This is an analytical study that explores and examines research and publication ethics and misconducts. Results: Based on literature review, major publication misconducts that many academic journals had to contend with over the years encompass unethical authorship, including ghost, guest, and gift authorships, data falsification and fabrication, plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, submission and publication fraud (multiple submission and publication), and potential conflicts of interest. Conclusions: KODISA and its journals have strived and done great work in making the journals transparent and in combatting the issues associated with plagiarism, including self-plagiarism. However, it seems there is no mechanism to detect or deter unethical authorship, conflicts of interest, and fabrication and falsification misconducts. The inception of JRPE signifies how KODISA and its journals continuously view research and publication ethics as their foremost important factor in maintaining and improving the academic journals. The future research and scholastic manuscripts of JRPE could provide necessary and updated information about research and publication ethics, practices, and misconducts.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.83-90
• /
• 2018

Purpose - Journals of Korea Distribution Science Association (KODISA) made great efforts in responding to the constant shifts in academic paradigms and in producing synergetic effects among KODISA journals to achieve the goal of maintaining their status in the world's reputable scholarly journals. The aim of this study is to analyze the current practice and performance of KODISA journals and develop strategies that will continuously meet and respond to the changes and success in the future. Research design, data, and methodology - This is a case study, an analytical approach, which focuses on analyzing current and previous strategies, practices, and performances of the four major journals of KODISA and the association. The organizational structure, including election and terms of KODISA officers, new membership, and members of editorial board, is discussed and analyzed. The citation, submission, publication, and rejection rates of all four journals are examined, and the progress, including the status of indexing of each journal, is discussed. Results - The analysis indicates that KODISA has significantly invested its resources into improving its journals and attracting new members. The analysis also shows the strategy of the organizational structure, which includes election and terms of officers and editorial board members that implemented over the years, was successful. Both Journal of Distribution Science (JDS) and Journal of Finance, Economics, and Business (JAFEB) are indexed in SCOPUS, with East Asian Journal of Business Management (EAJBM) in the final stage of the SCOPUS indexing evaluation, and International Journal of Industrial Distribution and Business (IJIDB) will complete and submit their indexing evaluation materials to SCOPUS this summer. Conclusions - The success and progress of KODISA and its journals clearly support the need for continuous development, analysis, revision, and implementation of strategies. Based on the analysis, conducting the annual performance reviews of the association and its journals and planning and strategizing based on the reviews since 2011 have greatly contributed to the overall success. In terms of meeting the short term strategy, KODISA has to continue developing relationships with relevant and appropriate scholarly/academic associations to expand the scope of its business, establishing independence of each journal and its respective procedures and practices and improving the quality of the journals and their publications through KODISA's international conferences.

• International Journal of Contents
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.43-46
• /
• 2014

Subject classification of journals is important because it can be utilized for the improvement of scholarly information services and analysis by research area. The classification by experts in a subject area wastes a lot of time and expense. On the other hand, the simple classification with basic information, such as the journal title has limitations. To solve this problem, this paper suggests the automatic classification of Korean journals using the SCI journals information cited by Korean journals, and an analysis of the classification result. In particular, this study adopted the WoS subject categories for classification to support the base for comparison between the Korean citation database and the global citation database (KSCI vs. SCI).

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.269-287
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 기술경영 연구 분야의 국내외 대표 학술지에 게재된 연구들을 토대로 연구 설계와 연구 방법론의 현황과 새로운 연구 분류체계를 제시하는데 그 목적이 있다. 본 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위하여 기술혁신학회지를 비롯한 기술경영 연구 분야의 국내 대표 학술지 2개와 상위 11개 국제 학술지에 2006년부터 2012년까지 수록된 696편의 연구 논문을 수집한 후 내용분석(contents analysis)을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 정성적 개념 연구, 정성적 실증 연구, 정량적 개념 연구, 정량적 실증 연구 등의 연구 설계 내에 총 8가지의 상세 연구방법론을 분류하였으며, 다음과 같이 국내외 연구자 및 학술지, 국내 대표 학술지 간 특징을 바탕으로 기술경영 연구 분야의 동향을 확인하였다. 첫째, 국내외 기술경영 연구자 및 학술지 간 연구 설계와 연구 방법론의 추세는 실증 연구 설계에 편중된 유사한 동향을 보이고 있는 반면, 해외 연구에서 이론 연구 설계의 비율은 국내 연구보다 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 기술혁신학회지에는 정성적 실증 연구 설계와 기록 연구 방법이 더 많이 발표된 것에 반해, 기술혁신연구에는 정량적 실증 연구 설계와 개념 연구 설계의 비율이 높았다. 본 연구결과는 기술경영 연구 분야에서 연구 설계와 연구 방법론에 대한 동향과 새로운 연구 분류체계를 제시함으로써 구체적이고 체계적인 연구 접근법에 대한 방향성을 제공할 뿐만 아니라 후속 연구자들이 연구 목적에 적합한 연구 설계와 연구 방법론을 선택하는데 도움을 줄 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.7-9
• /
• 2019

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to briefly review the contemporary global environment to suggest and develop appropriate strategies for KODISA and its journals. Research design, data, and methodology - This is an analytical case study that examines KODISA and its journals and the contemporary environment to demonstrate the importance of developing the future goals. Results - The analysis indicates that KODISA and its journals must decide whether to follow same footsteps of many reputable and big academic associations and journals or to start focusing more on the welfare of the public as an academic institution. Researches and scholarly works should be shared with everyone, and practicality and relevancy of researches should be valued and applied for the general welfare. Conclusions - Based on the progress and current success of KODISA and its journals, their goals should not be limited to just becoming a world renown academic association or journals. Promoting the welfare of the public through researches and scholarly activities should be their ultimate goal as an academic institution and journals. Attracting more practitioners and producing more researches that are practical and applicable to the public would be the first step while maintaining the quality and rigor of their academic and scholarly activities, which include publication practices.

• Ocean and Polar Research
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.133-156
• /
• 2009

We have named the sea surrounded by the Korean Peninsula, Primorye of Russia, and Japanese Islands as the East Sea. Historically this region has been variously named the East Sea, Chosun Sea, and, more recently, Japan Sea and Sea of Japan. Since the scientific research papers can play important roles on the naming the sea, the status of naming the East Sea in international scientific journals was investigated. Among 472 papers in 46 international journals that we assessed, Japan Sea (or Sea of Japan) was used in 322 papers (68.2%), East Sea was used in 21 papers (4.4%), and parallel usage of East Sea and Japan Sea accounted for 27.3% (129 papers). In all scientific papers before the early 1980s, East Sea was not used. Since the first parallel usage of East Sea and Japan Sea in 1985, these designations has been increasingly used. After 2004, the parallel usage has replaced the single designation of Japan Sea.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제15권5호
• /
• pp.75-83
• /
• 2017

Purpose - With the rise of the fourth industrial revolution, it has converged with the existing industrial revolution to give shape to increased accessibility of knowledge and information. As a result, it has become easier for scholars to actively persue and compile research in various fields. This current study aims to focus and assess the current standing of KODISA: the Journal of Distribution Science (JDS), International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business(IJIDB), the East Asian Journal of Business Management (EAJBM), the Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB) in a rapidly evolving era. Novel strategies for creating the future vision of KODISA 2020 will also be examined. Research design, data, and methodology - The current research will analyze published journals of KODISA in order to offer a vision for the KODISA 2020 future. In part 1, this paper will observe the current address of the KODISA journal and its overview of past achievements. Next, part 2 will discuss the activities that will be needed for journals of KODISA, JDS, IJIDB, EAJBM, JAFEB to branch out internationally and significant journals will be statistically analyzed in part 3. The last part 4 will offer strategies for the continued growth of KODISA and visions for KODISA 2020. Results - Among the KODISA publications, IJIDB was second, JDS was 23rd (in economic publications of 54 journals), and EAJBM was 22nd (out of 79 publications in management field journals). This shows the high quality of the KODISA publication journals. According to 2016 publication analysis, JDS, IJIDB, etc. each had 157 publications, 15 publications, 16 publications, and 28 publications. In the case of JDS, it showed an increase of 14% compared to last year. Additionally, JAFEB showed a significant increase of 68%. This shows that compared to other journals, it had a higher rate of paper submission. IJIDB and EAJBM did not show any significant increases. In JDS, it showed many studies related to the distribution, management of distribution, and consumer behavior. In order to increase the status of the KODISA journal to a SCI status, many more international conferences will open to increase its international recognition levels. Second, the systematic functions of the journal will be developed further to increase its stability. Third, future graduate schools will open to foster future potential leaders in this field and build a platform for innovators and leaders. Conclusions - In KODISA, JDS was first published in 1999, and has been registered in SCOPUS February 2017. Other sister publications within the KODISA are preparing for SCOPUS registration as well. KODISA journals will prepare to be an innovative journal for 2020 and the future beyond.