• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.3-17
• /
• 2015

For many years commentators have requested more active regulation of attorney ethics in international arbitration. Gradual deterioration of ethical standards in international arbitration will bring disrepute and, once its reputation is lost, it could take decades to rebuild confidence. The first reason for increasing unethical behavior is that there is no ethical code generally applied to all lawyers participating in international arbitration. A second reason might be that nobody is actively regulating attorneys in international arbitration. The first step to solve this problem is that major arbitration institutions should cooperate to enact a uniform code of conduct to be generally applied to all attorneys representing parties in international arbitration. Recently, IBA and LCIA prepared guidelines on party representation in international arbitration, and the guidelines will help attorneys follow uniform standardsof ethics. However, this will not be sufficient. There should be a regulating body to monitor attorney ethics and take sanctions against unethical attorneys accordingly. Arbitrators, who can see unethical behavior by attorneys from the closest distance, are the most appropriate regulating force rather than courts of arbitration seat or an attorney's licensing country. Of course, arbitrators don't have powers to withdraw or suspend an attorney's license, but they have powers to control attorneys'behavior within arbitration proceedings such as an allocation of fees and costs, barring the assertion of claims or defenses, drawing adverse inferences, or precluding the submission of evidence or testimony. Furthermore, arbitrators should be provided with such obligation as active control of attorney ethics. Even arbitration institutions should participate by imposing on an attorney who is a repeat offender a suspension from appearing in future arbitrations. Unethical behavior will decrease through concerted actions among arbitrational institutions to introduce a uniform code of conduct and to empower arbitrators for more efficient regulation of attorney ethics.

• International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.135-148
• /
• 2023

The Code of Ethics for Newspaper Advertising in Korea, first implemented in 1976 and subsequently revised in 1976, 1996, and 2021, is a critical regulatory instrument for the country's advertising sector. However, the specialized domain of "advertising ethics," particularly the "code of advertising ethics," remains under-explored. This research addresses this scholarly gap, providing an empirical analysis of the 2021 amendment's revision trajectory. This study employs a robust methodological approach, integrating expert interviews and small-group AHP-based surveys. This approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of the revision needs, referencing existing ethical codes studies, and comparing similar ethics codes nationally and internationally. The research further investigates key challenges such as personal data protection and copyright issues in the rapidly evolving digital media landscape, while preserving the existing code's inherent value. The findings are expected to significantly contribute to the emerging field of advertising ethics in Korea, offering practical implications for future code revisions.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제37권6호
• /
• pp.185-200
• /
• 2016

Objective: This study examined the code of ethics, which offers guidelines for early childhood teachers' ethical decisions and practices. Results and Conclusion: In the second section of this paper, the meaning of the code of ethics is reviewed. The issues of the code of ethics are also investigated to resolve moral and ethical dilemmas and to maintain high standards of professional conduct in early childhood care and education. In the third section of this paper, a comparison of the ethical codes in South Korea, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States is conducted. Based on the results raised in relation to the code of ethics principles and the results of comparing domestic and international ethics codes, the fourth section of this paper focuses on three topics in the current and future direction of the Korean code of ethics: (a) concreteness and clarity, (b) switching from the viewpoint of least harm to the viewpoint of maximum benefit, and (c) the range of benefits of the code of ethics. Then, including the existence of the last two codes of ethics, we discuss the direction of future difficulties currently associated with the situation in Korea.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.106-117
• /
• 2007

Recently there has arisen an increasing world-wide emphasis on teaching ethics within the engineering curriculum. Much of the teaching has relied on the use of an American model emphasizing autonomy and professional identification. This paper argues that this model is inadequate when engineering is seen in a global perspective, because different cultural values are dominant throughout the world, some of which stand in sharp contrast to traditional Western values based on the primacy of the individual. A new global engineering ethics thus needs to be constructed which takes into account a variety of different cultural values and local circumstances, but which is able to serve as a uniting ethical foundation for engineers throughout the world. The paper suggests that the development of a global code of engineering ethics would be a fruitful way to pursue such a strategy.

• 월간산업보건
• /
• 통권365호
• /
• pp.43-61
• /
• 2018

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.113-132
• /
• 2006

세계 각국의 아키비스트 협회 및 전문가 단체에서는 전문직적 기준과 아키비스트 윤리규정을 발표하고, 그 윤리규정을 통하여 실천적 과정에서 부딪히는 여러 가지 윤리적 문제들에 대해 윤리적 지침을 제공하고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 외국의 아키비스트 협회에서 채택한 윤리규정을 비교하여 아키비스트 윤리규정의 제정에 필요한 필수요소를 추출하고 아키비스트 윤리규정 모델을 제시하는 것이다. 이를 위해 SAA(미국), SA(영국), ACA(캐나다), ASA(호주), ICA(국제기구) 5개 아키비스트 협회를 선정하였다 아키비스트 윤리규 정을 크게 기록정보관리, 기록정보서비스, 전문직 실천과 조직에 관한 내용으로 나누어 분석하였고, 필수요소를 제안하였다. 아울러 필수요소를 중심으로 전자기록환경에서 고려하여야 할 점도 함께 고찰하였다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제78권
• /
• pp.31-51
• /
• 2018

As International arbitration has increased in popularity, there has been an expansion in the pool of arbitrators, and a commensurate diversification of not only the legal backgrounds but cultural backgrounds among themand among parties. As a result, there has been increased attention on the standards used to evaluate arbitrators' conduct and ethics, especially among them, 'Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrator' which is a precondition for an acceptable awards. There is no international treaty or code governing these issues. But the International Bar Association(IBA) seems to be leading the way such as establishing practical guidelines regarding to impartiality and independence of arbitrator. This article will review some theories, cases about impartiality and independence of arbitrator, and practical standards through the IBA guidelines. It is intended to provide specific guidance and criteria to the arbitrators, parties and counsels. And also it is expected to prevent unnecessary delays in arbitration proceedings in advance and filing for the annulment of arbitral awards because of lack of impartiality and independence of arbitrator as well.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.101-118
• /
• 2014

2000년대 중반 '참여, 공유, 개방'을 키워드로 하는 웹 2.0이 등장하여 하나의 사회 전반적인 문화코드로 자리잡아가고 있다. 수동적 참여자에서 능동적 사용자로의 변화를 핵심으로 하는 웹 2.0은 지금까지 진화하며 발전해나가고 있다. 하지만 진화과정에서 웹 2.0과 관련된 현실적 문제점 역시 지속적으로 나타나고 있으며, 본 연구는 이 가운데 사이버윤리성의 문제점에 초점을 두고자 한다. 사이버윤리성의 문제는 기술적 접근이나 법적 접근으로 해결하기에는 한계가 있으므로 본 연구는 사이버윤리성에 영향을 미치는 개인적 특성, 사회적 영향, 문화적 특성 등을 총체적으로 검토하고자 한다. 구체적으로 본 연구의 목적은 (1) 웹 2.0 환경에서 사용자의 개인적 특성(자기효능감, 자기통제)은 사이버윤리성에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가, (2) 웹 2.0의 사회적 영향요인인 주관적 규범이 사이버윤리성에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가, (3) 사용자의 사이버윤리성은 사용자의 웹 2.0 서비스 참여형태(조회, 생산)에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 가이다, 그리고 마지막으로 (4) 국가 간 문화적 차이에 따라 사회적 영향이 사이버윤리성에 미치는 효과는 어떻게 달라지는 가이다. 사용자의 개인적 특성, 사회적 영향요인, 사이버윤리성과 서비스 참여수준의 4가지 구성개념을 기반으로 연구모형이 제시되었으며, 이러한 연구모형은 한국과 미국에서 수집된 설문지를 기반으로 구조방정식 모형을 통해 검증되었다. 검증결과, 개인적 특성인 자기효능감과 자기통제력, 그리고 사회적 영향요인인 주관적 규범은 사이버윤리성에 유의한 영향을 미치며, 이후 생산적 참여활동에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2002년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.335-340
• /
• 2002

FIDIC $(F\acute{e}d\acute{e}ration Internationale des Ing\acute{e}nieurs-Conseils)$ is the worldwide federation of consulting engineering member associations dedicated to developing relationships between the consulting engineering profession and governments, funding agencies, banks, industry, commerce, contractors, suppliers and other construction industry professions. Today FIDIC membership numbers nearly 70 member associations from all parts of the globe. The members of each national association comply with FIDIC's code of ethics which calls for impartial advice, competence and fair competition. FIDIC acts as a forum for the exchange of views and information and actively encourages the discussion of matters of mutual concern among member associations. FIDIC prepared regulations concerning tenders, it is a method of choice of investment contractor, which serves to optimum of utilization of investment funds. FIDIC procedure is the most often used in international tenders.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.235-241
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 최근 이슈가 되고 있는 일간신문의 섹션(특집)광고의 특성을 분석하는데 있다. 2015년부터 2017년까지 신문윤리위원회의 심의 결정집에서 조치를 받은 총 1,927개의 광고를 분석하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻을 수 있었다. 첫째로 유형별 특징은 대부분의 섹션(광고)는 경고보다는 주의 조치를 많이 받았다. 두 번째는 주요 일간신문의 섹션(특집)광고의 양이 점차 증가하고 있고, 주요 경제지에도 섹션광고가 많이 나타나는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 세번째로 신문윤리강령의 실천 요강 중 언론으로써의 책임과 보도준칙에 위반사항이 많았다. 마지막으로 특정기업, 제품의 경우 영리와 홍보를 위해 게재의 원칙을 지키지 않는 경우는 신문의 신뢰성과 공정성이 훼손될 우려가 있기 때문에 이를 지키기 위한 스스로의 노력이 필요할 것이며, 보다 자율적 차원의 가이드라인이 마련되어야 할 것이다.