• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제67권4호
• /
• pp.5-29
• /
• 2015

한국사회의 세대관계는 매우 독특한 특징을 보이고 있다. 정치 영역에서는 격렬한 세대균열 현상이 발생하고 있고, 사회정책 영역에서는 세대간에 높은 수준의 평온한 세대연대가 유지되고 있는 것이 그것이다. 전국 여론조사에 대한 이항 로지스틱 회귀분석의 결과, 정치 영역에서는 이념성향과 대선후보선택 등에 세대균열과 지역균열 등 균열변수가 결정적 영향력을 미치고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 사회정책 영역의 경우, 젊은 세대와 다수 사회경제변수가 사회보장제도에 대한 우호적 태도를 결정하는 데 중요하게 작용하고 있는 것이 확인되었다. 정치 영역의 세대균열과 사회정책 영역의 세대연대가 이중적으로 존재하는 병렬모델은 정부와 정치권이 적극적 노력을 기울이지 않는 한 조만간 갈등모델로 전이될 가능성이 높은 것으로 예상된다. 인구구조가 역피라미드 구조로 급속히 바뀌고 있는 현실도 이런 상황을 악화시키고 있다. 병렬모델을 세대공생 모델로 전환하기 위해서는 정책적 재정적 측면의 세대정의 외에 청년세대의 공직진출을 지원하는 등의 정치적 세대정의도 모색되어야 한다. 저출산 고령화의 인구위기 속에서 세대관계는 궁극적으로 다음 시대를 준비하는 신복지국가 전략의 관점에서 접근되어야 한다.

• 이베로아메리카
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.33-77
• /
• 2021

Starting from the capabilities approach, this work develops the concept of Sustainable Wellbeing, which highlights the importance of incorporating temporal sustainability in the analysis of wellbeing, with intergenerational justice. For its measurement, 12 dimensions are identified and defined, based on the philosophical approach of Central Capabilities of Martha Nussbaum. The measurement is applied to 18 Latin American countries, with 116 indicators and using a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). The results show the viability of operationalizing the capabilities approach and its potential to support the formulation of associated policies.

• 분석과 대안
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.103-132
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study is to observe whether intergenerational differences exist in support among major Korean political parties and, if so, how they exist, based on the results of the survey conducted nationwide. To achieve the purpose of the study, a questionnaire was prepared based on conjoint analysis, and the collected data was analyzed by applying a random parameter logit model. The main results of model analysis are summarized as follows. First, among the policy variables, statistically significant results were observed in the generation of 20s and 30s for the education variable. It was found that both 20s and 30s aimed for equal education at a higher level than other generations. Especially, the highest intensity aim for equal education culture was observed in the 20s. Second, the coefficients of major political parties were observed with a high level of statistical significance. This appears to be a result suggesting that voters decide on their voting behavior through thorough policy comparisons in addition to comprehensive consideration on various current issues. Third, a clear support for conservative parties was observed in the generation of 20s. A clear and intense distribution of preference for political parties classified as conservatives was observed in the 20s generation, which can be said to be mainly college students. This seems to be a profound founding related to the issue of "conservatization of the 20s," which has recently become a hot topic in Korean society. Fourth, a high level of support for progressive parties was observed in the 30s and 40s. The Justice Party can be classified as a minority party in the National Assembly House as of January 2019. Nevertheless, it was maintained at a relatively high level in national recognition, and it is presumed that the background was high level of support from the 30s and 40s. Fifth, a large level of standard deviation was observed in the preference for conservative parties in the 50s. This means that some respondents who are in their 50s or older strongly support the Liberty Korea Party, and some respondents in the same generation strongly disapprove it. Due to this countervailing power, it seems that the average support level for the Liberal Korean Party is low in the generations of 50s and older.?