Analyses & Alternatives (분석과 대안)

Korea Consensus Institute(KCI) (사단법인 코리아컨센서스연구원)
권호 표지

An Empirical Study on Difference of Approval Rate for the Political Parties among Generations

정당 지지에 대한 세대별 차이 고찰

  • Received : 2020.08.16
  • Accepted : 2020.09.17
  • Published : 2020.09.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to observe whether intergenerational differences exist in support among major Korean political parties and, if so, how they exist, based on the results of the survey conducted nationwide. To achieve the purpose of the study, a questionnaire was prepared based on conjoint analysis, and the collected data was analyzed by applying a random parameter logit model. The main results of model analysis are summarized as follows. First, among the policy variables, statistically significant results were observed in the generation of 20s and 30s for the education variable. It was found that both 20s and 30s aimed for equal education at a higher level than other generations. Especially, the highest intensity aim for equal education culture was observed in the 20s. Second, the coefficients of major political parties were observed with a high level of statistical significance. This appears to be a result suggesting that voters decide on their voting behavior through thorough policy comparisons in addition to comprehensive consideration on various current issues. Third, a clear support for conservative parties was observed in the generation of 20s. A clear and intense distribution of preference for political parties classified as conservatives was observed in the 20s generation, which can be said to be mainly college students. This seems to be a profound founding related to the issue of "conservatization of the 20s," which has recently become a hot topic in Korean society. Fourth, a high level of support for progressive parties was observed in the 30s and 40s. The Justice Party can be classified as a minority party in the National Assembly House as of January 2019. Nevertheless, it was maintained at a relatively high level in national recognition, and it is presumed that the background was high level of support from the 30s and 40s. Fifth, a large level of standard deviation was observed in the preference for conservative parties in the 50s. This means that some respondents who are in their 50s or older strongly support the Liberty Korea Party, and some respondents in the same generation strongly disapprove it. Due to this countervailing power, it seems that the average support level for the Liberal Korean Party is low in the generations of 50s and older.?

Keywords

References

  1. 강원택. (2013). 한국 선거에서의 계급배반투표와 사회계층, 한국정당학회보, 12(3), 5~28.
  2. 강원택.성예진. (2018). 2017년 대통령 선거에서 이념과 세대: 보수 성향 유권자를 중심으로, 한국정치연구, 27(1), 205~240.
  3. 데이비드 컬렌더 외 지음. 박만섭 옮김. (2011). 경제학, 최전방의 동향, 지식을 만드는 지식.
  4. 서환주. (2019). 경제와 정치의 상호작용에 대한 새로운 탐색: 조절 이론 및 제도주의 정치경제학을 중심으로, 현장성과 다양성 강화를 위한 논쟁과 소통의 장, 한국사회경제학회 2019 가을학술대회 자료집.
  5. 우경봉. (2010). Nested logit 모델 추정을 이용한 신차-중고자동차 선택 분석, 산업조직연구, 18(3), 37~58.
  6. 우경봉. (2012). 정보의 비대칭성 해소에 대한 지불의사액 측정에 관한 연구 - 소비자선호 분석을 통한 접근-, 한일경상논집, 57(3), 209 ~ 225.
  7. 우경봉. (2020). 경제 주체의 정책선호 방향과 진보, 보수 선택, 산업연구, 44(2), 87~116.
  8. 이내영.정한울. (2013). 세대균열의 구성요소: 코호트 효과와 연령효과, 의정연구, 19(3), 39~83.
  9. 임종원.박형진.강명수. (2001). 마케팅조사방법론, 법문사.
  10. 임홍택. (2019). 90년생이 온다, whale books.
  11. 전은하.이성우. (2007). 수도권 통근자의 통행수단 선택 분석: 1995-2000, 서울도시연구, 8(4), 107~125.
  12. 조너선 하이트 지음, 왕수민 옮김. (2014). 바른 마음, 웅진지식하우스.
  13. 천관율.정한울. (2019). 20대 남자, 시사인북.
  14. 최슬기.이윤석.김석호. (2019). 세대별로 투표하는 정당이나 후보는 달라지는가?, 한국사회, 20(2), 103~130. https://doi.org/10.22862/KJSR.2019.20.2.004
  15. 최용문.진영근. (1999). 유럽 배낭여행 상품 선호구조에 따른 최적상품 개발에 관한 연구 - 컨조인트 분석을 중심으로-, 관광정책학연구, 5(2), 185~211.
  16. Greene, H. G. (2016). NLOGIT VERSION6 Reference Guide, Econometric Software, Inc.
  17. Hensher, D. A. and Greene, W. G. (2003). The mixed logit model: the state of practice, Transportation, 30(2), 133-176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022558715350
  18. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A. and Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Revelt, D. and Train, K. (1998). Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 647-657. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557735
  20. Train, K. (2003). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press.