• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between intangible asset items and company value by empirical research in the medical industry, which may enhance usefulness of the results of other empirical research on intangible asset and company value. In order to attain the purpose of this study, the stock price is taken as the independent variable and all of intangible asset items reported to a balance sheet except the development expenditures and other development expenditures, and advertisement expenses, ordinary research & development expenditures reported on the income statement are taken as the dependent variables. In the following, I carried out four meaningful results from the analysis. First, research hypothesis 1; Book value of intangible asset reported in balance sheet bears positive relationship with company value shows that development expenditures 1 variable gives positive association in a significant level while a group of \10,000-above-company shows no relationship with company value, the other group of below-\10,000-company supports a consistently significant association. All this considering, we have to keep in mind that lack of prudence may leads to wrong results when we try to analyze. Second, research hypothesis 2; Intangible asset and other intangible asset expenditures reported on the income statement gives positive effect on company value shows that R&D accounts variables give insignificance in a statistical level to all company, including entire group, \10,000-above and below consistently. These results testify that current accounting system is valid. Third, in the case of other intangible asset, it requires further examination of current KAS because statistical results show negatively significant value or insignificant value in a statistical level. That means the more intangible assets, the less company value or nothing. Last, in the case of advertisement expenditure variables of above-\10,000 and entire company shows insignificances in a statistical level consistently while below-\10,000-company shows significant result coherently. We should regard accounting information on the advertisement expenditures of \10,000-below-company with caution. The results of this study provide controversial points whether intangible asset items reported on B/S, excluding development expenditures, should be regarded as asset. To facilitate the utility of accounting information on intangible asset, it seems necessary to regard advertisement expenditures reported on I/S as asset accounts. There are further arguments on the way of dealing with intangible asset under KAS that might be considered.

• 산학경영연구
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.147-171
• /
• 2007

본 연구는 휴양콘도미니엄의 무형자산이 시장경쟁력 및 재무성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 이를 위하여 콘도미니엄이 가지는 서비스산업의 특성을 고려하여 외부적 무형자산을 브랜드자간, 그리고 고객관계자산으로, 내부적 자산은 인적자산, 서비스운영자산으로 구분하여 총 9개의 변수로 무형자산을 재구성하여 측정하였다. 국내 주요 콘도미니엄을 대상으로 자료수집을 하였으며 측정척도의 신뢰성을 검증하고 요인분석(factor analysis)을 통해서 인적자산, 고객관계자산, 서비스운영자산, 그리고 브랜드자산의 요인구조를 도출하였다. 요인화된 자산변수와 경영성과로서 시장경쟁력과 재무성과와의 영향관계를 분석하였다. 분석결과의 내용을 보면 대체적으로 무형자산이 높을수록 콘도미니엄의 시장경쟁력과 재무성과가 높게 나타난 것을 알 수 있다. 다만 재무성과에 있어서 브랜드자산과 서비스운영자산이 영향을 미치지 알고 있는 것으로 분석되었다.

• 지적과 국토정보
• /
• 제45권1호
• /
• pp.207-224
• /
• 2015

본 연구의 목적은 부동산평가에 있어 소득접근법에 속하는 무형자산의 평가기법을 고찰하는 데 있다. 소득접근법에 의한 무형자산의 가치는 장래 기대되는 경제적 편익을 현재가치로 환원한 값이다. 관계법령의 무형자산의 평가기준으로는 감정평가에 관한 규칙, 지식재산기본법, 국유재산법의 규정을 검토하였다. 경제적 편익의 추계방법으로는 외삽법, 생애주기분석법, 감응도분석법, 시뮬레이션분석법, 판단법, 타불라라사법을, 자본환원율과 할인율의 추계방법으로는 시장추출법, 자본가격결정모형, 조성법, DCF모형, 가중평균자본비용법을 고찰하였다. 대상무형자산의 자본환원방법으로는 사용료절감법, 초과이익환원법, 이윤분할법, 업체가치잔여법, 가상소득환원법 등을 살펴보았다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.341-367
• /
• 2008

This study propose a model relating supplier's use of IOIS(Inter-Organizational Information Systems) to strategic benefits through extension of Subramani's research model. In extended model, collaboration serves as a safeguard for relationship-specific intangible asset. Specifically, we evaluate how two patterns of IOIS use by supplier(exploitation and exploration) relate to two specific types of relationship-specific intangible asset(business process specificity and domain knowledge specificity), which in turn are posited to promote collaboration and strategic benefits. To explore the current study, questionnaire survey was conducted on 72 first-tier supplier firms in the manufacturing industry. Based on the survey results, we posits the following : (1) Each pattern of IOIS use directly promotes a specific type of relationship-specific intangible asset. The path of the relationship between IOIS use for exploitation and domain knowledge specificity is positive but not significant. The other paths are positive and significant. (2) Both types of relationship-specific intangible asset have a positive and significant impact on collaboration. (3) Domain knowledge specificity influences on strategic benefits but business process specificity does not have an effect on them. (4) Collaboration affects supplier's strategic benefits. These findings provide a deeper understanding of the mechanism of how the pattern of IOIS use can result in strategic benefits for supplier firms.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.35-49
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is to examine whether suppliers are able to benefit by means of constructing a relationship-specific intangible asset and participating in collaboration with purchasers to actively maintain value created while mutually using inter-organizational information systems. To achieve the purpose of this study. 82 questionnaires have been analyzed from suppliers which are using electronic transactions through inter-organizational information systems. As a result, business process specificity and domain knowledge specificity, which are relationship-specific intangible assets, affect operational collaboration and strategic collaboration, which are classified by level of decision-making. Although both types of collaboration are needed to achieve both strategic and operational benefits, we find each collaboration to be uniquely promoted by a specific types of relationship-specific intangible asset. Operational collaboration is found to be an antecedent to operational benefit and strategic collaboration is found to be an antecedent to strategic benefits. No crossover between collaboration and supplier's benefits is found. Consequently, the result of this study shows collaboration is needed for domestic suppliers, which have relatively low levels of collaboration, to keep maintain relationship-specific intangible assets and to prevent the relationship termination cost when transactions have been stopped between supplier and purchaser. Also the results imply the supplier can have advantages by participating in collaboration.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.11-22
• /
• 2022

The iron and steel sector is caught between two worlds: "carbon reduction" and "development." The goal of this study is to show that optimizing asset structure to boost intangible assets, particularly brand assets, is a viable strategy to achieve low-carbon development. This study uses panel data from 38 A-share companies in China's iron and steel industry from 2010 to 2020, as well as World Brand Lab data, to create a comprehensive impact index of enterprise value from the standpoint of an asset structure optimization, and to test the impact of intangible assets and brand equity on enterprise value. The findings show that: the asset structure of iron and steel enterprises is closely related to enterprise value, implying that iron and steel industry development necessitates a transformation of quantity control and quality improvement; the proportion of intangible assets in the asset structure of iron and steel enterprises plays a positive and critical role in enterprise value under surplus conditions. The iron and steel industry begins to shift from tangible to intangible assets; there is heterogeneity in the iron and steel industry transformation. Given certain technological levels, the share of brand assets contributes significantly to the increase in enterprise value.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.757-769
• /
• 2013

건설엔지니어링 기업은 대표적인 지식기반산업으로서 무형자산의 평가 및 관리가 더욱 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 기업 특성을 고려하여 무형자산 분류체계를 작성하고, 설문과 인과지도구축을 통해 주요요소를 추출하여 건설엔지니어링 기업의 무형자산 측정을 위한 요소분류체계를 제시하였다. 기업가치 상승을 위한 무형자산 관리는 각 무형자산 세부요소 간 인과관계에 대한 이해가 뒷받침돼야 하므로, System Dynamics 분석을 통하여 인과관계를 파악하고 제시된 방법론을 검증하였다. 제시된 방법론을 통하여 건설 엔지니어링 기업의 특성이 고려된 무형자산을 인식하게 되어 건설엔지니어링 기업의 무형자산을 합리적으로 평가하는데 기여함으로써 건설엔지니어링 산업의 발전을 도모할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제3권3호
• /
• pp.94-102
• /
• 2002

"측정할 수 없는 것은 관리할 수 없다"는 말은 성과측정 시스템의 중요성을 잘 나타내 주는 말이다. 또한 이처럼 어려움을 나타내는 표현도 없다. 기업의 유형자산은 재무제표나 손익계산서 등의 구체적인 금액으로 측정이 가능하나 기업의 무형자산에 대한 가치측정은 많은 방법들이 도입되어 왔지만 어느 하나도 객관적인 틀을 제시하지 못하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 LG경제연구원에서 제시한 지식자산 축적모형(XYZ모형)을 통하여 건설기업의 무형자산(지적자산)의 크기를 객관적으로 정량화 시키었다. 이를 통하여 현 건설기업의 내재가치 수준을 추정할 수 있다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 3th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.876-882
• /
• 2009

With overall opening of global construction market by World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements, importance of management efficiency of construction industry which considers both tangible and intangible assets is recently being recognized in our nation. That is, efforts for reinforcement of competitiveness must be placed through maximization of values of internal and external intangible assets of construction industry such as management innovation, information, investment in technology and R&D and intellectual property. Accordingly in this study, evaluation criteria for intangible assets of construction industry were investigated and classified. Using such criteria, evaluation index and model were established based on the degree of importance of each criterion. The purpose of this study is to review importance of intangible assets in terms of competitiveness and management efficiency of construction industry and to provide basic data for establishment of intangible assets and revitalization of investment.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.79-86
• /
• 2020

The effects of R&D investment on innovation such as patents and intangible assets, and the effect on the corporate performance such as revenue and profit growth, were analyzed using path analysis. In particular, this study compared and analyzed the performances of non-cooperative R&D and cooperative R&D. The results of this study are summarized as follows. First, R&D investment has a significant impact on innovation performance. This supports the existing research results. Second, patents have a significant impact on intangible asset growth. Third, in the case of corporate groups carrying out cooperative R&D, intangible asset growth forms a significant causal relationship with revenue growth. Fourth, in case of cooperative R&D, intangible asset growth has a significant mediating effect between patent and revenue growth. Like the existing research, the results of this research support the innovation performance of R&D investment. It also supports the existing argument that the results of cooperative R&D are more favorable to increase corporate value. However, unlike the existing research, we found a path leading to increased revenue through patents and intangible assets, and confirmed that such a path is likely to be achieved through cooperative R & D rather than internal R&D.